ACHIEVEMENT DESCRIPTORS | My Assignment Tutor

1 ACHIEVEMENT DESCRIPTORSAs Marking Guide for Legal Institutions and ProcessesAssessment 4: EssayCRITERIA(and value as% of overallmark)OutstandingHighDistinctionDistinctionCreditPassBasicPassFailMajorFailNull95 – 100%85 – 94%75 – 84%65 – 74%60 – 64%50 – 59%40 – 49%20 – 39%0 – 19%LegalproblemAppliesrelevant law(both caselaw andlegislation) tomaterial factsto suggestlikelyoutcome of alegalproblem.20%Application ofrelevant law tomaterial facts iscomplete in itscoverage andachieved to anoutstandinglevel.Application ofrelevant law tomaterial facts iscomplete in itscoverage andachieved to anexcellent level.Application ofrelevant law tomaterial facts isalmost completein its coverageand achieved toan advancedlevel.Application ofrelevant law tomaterial facts ispartiallycomplete in itscoverage and isachieved to alevel of solidcompetence.Application ofrelevant law tomaterial facts ispartiallycomplete in itscoverage and isachieved to alevel of basiccompetence.Application ofrelevant law tomaterial facts isbasic in itscoverage and isachieved withbaselineproficiency.Application ofrelevant law tomaterial facts issomehowbasicallyincluded and issomehowbasicallyachieved, butthis inclusionandachievement isunclear.Application ofrelevant law tomaterial facts isnot evenbasicallyincluded and isnot evenbasicallyachieved, or thatinclusion andachievement isvery unclear.The paper doesnot demonstrateany applicationof law tomaterial factsand/or suggestany legaloutcome.LegalInstitutionsandProcessesDemonstratesfamiliaritywith theformal andinformalinstitutionsand processeswhich createand shape thedevelopmentof Aust’nlaw.20%Familiarity withtheseinstitutions andprocesses iscomplete in tisbreadth and isachieved to anoutstandinglevel.Familiarity withtheseinstitutions andprocesses iscomplete in itsbreadth and isachieved to anexcellent level.Familiarity withtheseinstitutions andprocesses isalmost completein its breadthand is achievedto an advancedlevel.Familiarity withtheseinstitutions andprocesses ispartiallycomplete in itsbreadth and isachieved to alevel of solidcompetence.Familiarity withtheseinstitutions andprocesses ispartiallycomplete in itsbreadth and isachieved to alevel of basiccompetence.Familiarity withtheseinstitutions andprocesses isbasic in itsbreadth and isachieved withbaselineproficiency.Familiarity withtheseinstitutions andprocesses issomehowbasicallyincluded and issomehowbasicallyachieved, butthis inclusionandachievement isunclear.Familiarity withtheseinstitutions andprocesses is noteven basicallyincluded and isnot evenbasicallyachieved, or thatinclusion andachievement isvery unclear.The paper doesnot demonstrateany familiaritywith theseinstitutions andprocesses. 2 Analysis ofoperationUsinghistorical andtheoreticalperspectives,analyses andcritiques ofthe efficacyof theoperation ofAustralianlaw and legalinstitutions.25%Using bothperspectives, thepaper achievesan outstandinglevel of analysisand critique ofthe efficacy ofthe operation ofAustralian lawand legalinstitutions.Using bothperspectives, thepaper achievesan excellentlevel of analysisand critique ofthe efficacy ofthe operation ofAustralian lawand legalinstitutions.Using bothperspectives, thepaper achievesan advancedlevel of analysisand critique ofthe efficacy ofthe operation ofAustralian lawand legalinstitutions.Using either orbothperspectives, thepaper achieves alevel of solidcompetence inits analysis andcritique of theefficacy of theoperation ofAustralian lawand legalinstitutions.Using either orbothperspectives, thepaper achieves alevel of basiccompetence inits analysis andcritique of theefficacy of theoperation ofAustralian lawand legalinstitutions.Using either orbothperspectives, thepaper achievesbaselineproficiency inits analysis andcritique of theefficacy of theoperation ofAustralian lawand legalinstitutions.The papersomehowincludesbaselineanalysis andcritique of theefficacy of theoperation ofAustralian lawand legalinstitutions, butthis inclusion isunclear.The paper doesnot include evenbaselineanalysis andcritique of theefficacy of theoperation ofAustralian lawand legalinstitutions, orthat inclusion isvery unclear.The paper doesnot demonstrateany analysis orcritique of theefficacy of theoperation ofAustralian lawand legalinstitutions.ArgumentAnalysis andcritique isused todevelop andto support aclear andlogicalargument.15%The paperapplies itsanalysis andcritique todevelop and tosupport a clearand logicalargument to anoutstandinglevel.The paperapplies itsanalysis andcritique todevelop and tosupport a clearand logicalargument to anexcellent level.The paperapplies itsanalysis andcritique todevelop and tosupport a clearand logicalargument to anadvanced level.The paperapplies itsanalysis andcritique todevelop and tosupport a clearand logicalargument to alevel of solidcompetence.The paperapplies itsanalysis andcritique todevelop and tosupport a clearand logicalargument to alevel of solidcompetence.The paperapplies itsanalysis andcritique todevelop and anargument to alevel of basiccompetence.The papersomehowbasically appliesits analysis andcritiquesomehow todevelop a basicargument, butthat applicationand argumentare unclear.The paper doesnot developeven a basicargument, orthat argument isvery unclear.The paper doesnot suggest anyargument.Structure,Writing,GrammarThe paperdemonstratesa clear andlogicalstructure,appropriateacademicwriting style,and is free ofgrammaticaland spellingmistakes.10%The paper isorganised andstructuredclearly andlogically. Thepaper is writtenwith anacademic voiceand anoutstandinglevel of clarity.The grammarand spelling areflawless.The paper isorganised andstructuredclearly andlogically. Thepaper is writtenwith anacademic voiceand an excellentlevel of clarity.Only very fewminorgrammatical andspelling errorsare present.The paper isorganised andstructuredclearly andlogically. Thepaper is writtenwith anacademic voiceand an advancedlevel of clarity.Only few minorgrammatical andspelling errorsare present.The paper isorganised andstructuredclearly andlogically,although moreconsistencywould improveit. It is wellwritten, with agood level ofacademic voice,and readilyfollowed. Somegrammatical/spelling errorsare present.Organisationand structure arepresent,although moretransparencyand consistencyof logical flowwould improveit. The clarity ofthe writing isuneven and/orcould beimproved. Anumber ofgrammatical/spelling errorsare present.Organisationand structure arepresent in thepaper, althoughmarked byinconsistencyand a lack oflogical flow.There is a lackclarity in thewriting and/or itis inconsistent.A good numberofgrammatical/spelling errors arepresent.Organisationand structure arenot present inthe paper, or arenot clear. Thewriting lacksclarity and/or itis inconsistent.A significantnumber ofgrammatical andspelling errorsare present.Organisationand structure arenot present inthe paper, or areextremelyunclear, or areconfusing. Thewriting isunclear and isinconsistent.The paper isreplete withgrammatical andspelling errors.Organisationand structure arenot present inthe paper.The writing isunclear andcannot befollowed.The paper isreplete withgrammatical andspelling errorsto the point thatit is effectivelyunreadable. 3 Formatting,Citation,Referencing10%All formattingrequirements aremet.The citation andreferencing areflawless.Only very fewminor errors arepresent in theformattingrequirements.The citation andreferencingcontain onlyvery few minorerrors.Only a fewerrors arepresent in theformattingrequirements.The citation andreferencingcontain only afew errors.Some errors arepresent in theformattingrequirements.The citation andreferencingcontain someerrors.A number oferrors arepresent in theformattingrequirements.The citation andreferencingcontain anumber oferrors.A good numberof errors arepresent in theformattingrequirements.The citation andreferencingcontain a goodnumber oferrors.A significantnumber oferrors arepresent in theformattingrequirements.The citation andreferencingcontain asignificantnumber oferrors.The paper isreplete withformattingerrors.The citation andreferencing arereplete witherrors.The paper doesnot comply withthe formattingrequirements.The paper doesnot comply withcitation andreferencingrequirements.

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *