Discussion: AnalysisTo generate analysis, scholarly writers ask themselves questions about the evidence, such as What does this piece of evidence mean? How does it bolster my argument? How does this piece of evidence connect to another piece? What do I want my readers to understand or get from this evidence? In this Discussion, you practice answering these questions by analyzing the evidence from Week 3. To prepare for this Discussion: Review the Week 3 Discussion for your paraphrased evidence as well as any feedback received.Review the Learning Resources on analysis.Recall the argument you are making.By Day 4Post your initial 1- to 2-paragraph response that addresses the following: Using the evidence you identified and paraphrased in Week 3, analyze that evidence in the context of the argument you are making.Additionally, reflect on the process of analyzing the evidence. Pose any questions and/or explain challenges that came up during the process.By Day 6Respond to at least two colleagues by doing one of the following: Give feedback on their analysisShare insights on analyzing evidenceAddress one of the questions or challenges your colleague posed, based on your experience or knowledgeNote: Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your colleagues made. Submission and Grading InformationGrading CriteriaTo access your rubric: Week 4 Discussion Rubric The post Week 4 Discussion Thread appeared first on Template.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS