Detailed Task Outline | My Assignment Tutor

1PHIL 201 Final TestDetailed Task OutlineDate of test: 07/06/19Length: No set word lengthTime allowed: 2 hrs (access from 9am to 9pm)Weight: 35%OverviewAll students are expected to complete an online test at the end of the semester. The finaltest assesses students’ understanding of key readings, concepts, topics and arguments fromeach section of the unit as well as their ability to explain relevant ideas and argumentsclearly and succinctly.InstructionsYou must answer FIVE of the twelve questions. The test has three sections, A, B, and C. Youmust answer at least ONE question from EACH section. Each question is worth 7 marks.Note: As is standard with final exams, grades will be given without comments. Studentsshould contact the convenor if they would like feedback on their test performance.Preparation• Review the marking rubric for this assessment task.• The test will include questions similar to those discussed each week in the seminarsand online and the questions set for the two quiz assignments.• The questions may be on any of the topics covered in the unit.• Review the lecture notes, essential readings and seminar discussion questions.Answering the questions• This is an online quiz. You will be able to access it via the PHIL 201 iLearn homepage.• There will be a period of twelve hours (9am – 9pm) on the due date during whichstudents can access the quiz questions. Once you have begun the quiz, you will have2 hrs in which to complete five questions.• Remember that you must select at least one question from each of the threesections, A, B, and C.• You must answer five of the twelve questions.• This is a short answer assignment. Do not answer the questions in the form of anessay. Write in short paragraphs and full sentences (not dot points).• There is no set word limit for this assignment. Students will be assessed on how wellthey answer the questions in the given time and not on the length of their answers.• Keep in mind, however, that very brief and superficial answers are unlikely to dowell. Your answers should demonstrate critical engagement with the ideas, conceptsand issues relevant to the question.• Make sure you answer every part of each question.2• Remember to explain points and arguments in your own words, limit directquotations and avoid close paraphrasing of the source material. Students will losemarks if they merely reproduce lecture notes or closely paraphrase source material.• You do not need to include formal citations or references for this assessment task.Do mention relevant authors where appropriate. E.g. “Williams argues that…”;“According to Kant…”Assessment CriteriaThis task will be assessed by the following criteria:1. Question• Does the student show a clear and precise understanding of the questions?• How well are the questions answered?Note: Very often in philosophy there is more than one plausible response to a question.A plausible and well-argued response to a question that demonstrates familiarity withthe relevant readings, lectures, concepts and arguments will do well even if your markerdisagrees with your particular interpretation of the issues.2. Explanation, Understanding and Analysis• Does the student identify and explain key issues, concepts and arguments in a clearand precise manner?• Are answers adequately supported with reference to relevant readings and lectures?• Does the student demonstrate a deep and critical understanding of relevantarguments, concepts and issues?• Does the student demonstrate a high level of originality and creativity?3. Ethical Analysis• Are answers, where appropriate, supported by relevant ethical principles, values andreasons?• Is the use of ethical principles, values and reasons consistent with the student’sparticular moral judgements and moral conclusions?4. Written Expression and Presentation• Is written expression clear and concise?• Is the physical presentation of the assignment adequate (in relation to legibility,spelling, grammar)?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.