particular cause of mortality or morbidity | My Assignment Tutor

What am I required to do in this assignment?For writing a report on the epidemiology of a particular cause of mortality or morbidity, you need to identify a suitable topic of a particularcause of mortality or morbidity of the disease or condition (e.g. malaria, tuberculosis). Most importantly, you should identify and use atleast one well-known data source such as Demographic Health Survey (DHS) or WHO data source related to mortality or morbidity statisticsfor your data. You will perform appropriate analysis of your chosen secondary data set to identify risk factors for the particular cause ofmortality or morbidity that is the focus of your assignment. Thirdly, you are also expected to refer to other relevant literature, asappropriate, to complement the data you are using – so doing a quick database search might help to locate some relevant resources.Fourthly, you need to provide a critical discussion of the strengths and limitations of the SECONDARY data sources you have used e.g. howthe data was collected, whom by, sampling frame, sample size, inclusion/exclusion criteria, population size, missing data, data manipulation,bias, generalisability. Finally, propose evidence-based recommendations to strengthen and/or improve the current prevention and controlstrategies to reduce its impact on public health in the future. Submit assignment Submission DeadlineMarks and FeedbackBefore 10am on:15/01/202120 working days after deadline (L4, 5 and 7)15 working days after deadline (L6)10 working days after deadline (block delivery) Unit title & codePublic Health Intelligence PUB015-6Assignment number and title2: Epidemiological reportAssignment typeReportWeighting of assignment60%Size or length of assessment2500 wordsUnit learning outcomes1. Demonstrate the following knowledge and understanding:Demonstrate a critical understanding of the principles, analytical techniques, tool kits and methods inhealth intelligence, and their application to improving public health practice.2. Demonstrate the following skills and abilities:Critically assess and synthesise the role of public health intelligence in terms of translating evidenceinto public health policy through synthesising, appraising, interpreting and communicating intelligencethat measures the health status, risks, needs and health outcomes of defined populations. Marks and feedbackCompleting Your Assignment2 What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF)1. Select a topic related to the epidemiology of a particular cause of mortality or morbidity of the disease or condition (e.g. malaria,tuberculosis).2. Identify a well-known secondary dataset/data sources such as Demographic Health Survey (DHS) or WHO dataset(s) that relates toyour chosen topic.3. Demonstrate the understanding of the strengths, limitations and weaknesses of the SECONDARY dataset/data sources you haveused, e.g., how the data was collected, by whom, sampling frame, sample size, inclusion / exclusion criteria, population size,missing data, data manipulation, bias, and generalisability, including problems and challenges in healthcare.4. Perform an appropriate analysis of the chosen dataset to identify risk factors for the cause of mortality or morbidity of the diseaseor conditionHow do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade?How does this assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions?Each week the public health intelligence lecture(s) will emphasise the importance of data/data sources. In this assignment, you will use yourknowledge and understanding of the strengths, limitations and weaknesses of the SECONDARY dataset/data sources e.g. how the data wascollected, by whom, sampling frame, sample size, inclusion / exclusion criteria, population size, missing data, data manipulation, bias, andgeneralizability, which would ultimately help to assess the effectiveness and quality of data as well as propose evidence-informedrecommendations in public health practice. The sessions will include training on the analysis of secondary data sets using samples provided. How will my assignment be marked?Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page.You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit. Marks and Feedback3 Pass – 40-49%Pass – 50-59%Commendation – 60-69%Distinction– 70%+1 Writtenexpression andstructureOverall presentation ofthe epidemiological reportis satisfactory but lacksinformative figures and/ortables.Most points are explainedcoherently, but thestructure and organizationof the report are veryweak.Satisfactory use of keyterminology, butexplanations are vagueand over-simplistic.The assessment questionis addressed superficially;report includes interestingbut irrelevant datasetsused throughout.Many spelling andgrammatical errorsthroughout the report.Good, well presentedepidemiological report butfigures and/or tables lackinformative titles or arepoorly presented.Report has a good,appropriate secondarydataset/data sources used,well-organized structure andpoints are explainedcoherentlyGood, correct use of keyterminology, butexplanations are relativelybasic.Attempts to address theassessment question well,but report includes someirrelevant information.Some spelling andgrammatical errors.Presentation of theepidemiological report,including figures andtables is very good.Report has a clearstructure and informationis well organized andrelevant secondarydataset/data sourcesused. Very good, detailedand coherent discussion.Demonstrates very goodunderstanding and use keyterminology.Focuses on addressingassessment question andavoids the inclusion ofirrelevant secondarydataset/data sources.Minimal spelling andgrammatical errorsExcellent or outstandingpresentation of publicationstandard.Written expression isconcise, accurate andarticulate.Excellent, coherent in-depthdiscussion.Report appropriatelyutilized SECONDARYdataset/data sources andtightly focuses on andsuccessfully addresses theassessment question.Minor spelling andgrammatical errors2 Use of literatureand referencingHas identified essentialliterature but a minimalrange of literature is cited.References and citationsare included but UoBHarvard style is not usedconsistently.Good range of evidencecited including current peerreviewed primary literature.Most references andcitations are formatted inthe UoB Harvard style, butsome inaccuracies remain.Very good range ofevidence cited includingcurrent peer-reviewedprimary literature.References and citationsare consistentlyformatted, with most inthe UoB Harvard style.An excellent,comprehensive range ofcurrent primary literature isused effectively to supportdiscussion.References and citations areconsistently formatted inthe UoB Harvard style.3 Application ofknowledge andunderstandingReport identifies the keytopic related to theepidemiology of aparticular cause ofmortality or morbidity ofthe disease or conditionusing suitable SECONDARYdataset/data sources (e.g.malaria, tuberculosis) andhighlights limitedstrategies implemented toimprove quality of datawithin a specified area.Report identifies the keytopic related to theepidemiology of a particularcause of mortality ormorbidity of the disease orcondition using suitableSECONDARY dataset/datasources (e.g. malaria,tuberculosis), and includesgood detailed description ofkey strategies implementedto improve quality of datawithin a specified area.Report highlights the keytopic related to theepidemiology of aparticular cause ofmortality or morbidity ofthe disease or conditionusing appropriate suitableSECONDARY dataset/datasources (e.g. malaria,tuberculosis), highlight abroad range of strategiesto improve quality of datawithin a specified area.Report highlights a broadrange of strategies andpresents an excellentdetailed description of theepidemiological report anddiscuss and analyse a broadrange of strategiesimplemented to improvequality of data within aspecified area. 4 4 Criticalevaluation ofSECONDARYdataset/datasources you haveusedA limited attempt toidentify and understandthe strengths, limitationsand weaknesses of theSECONDARY dataset/datasources you have usedDemonstrates a goodunderstanding of strengthsand weaknesses ofSECONDARY dataset/datasources you have used.Demonstrates a very goodunderstanding ofstrengths and weaknessesof SECONDARYdataset/data sources youhave used. Very good,detailed critical analysis ofeffectiveness of theinterventions based onevidence synthesized frommultiple data sources ofgood quality information.Presents excellent, in-depthand insightful report.Demonstrates excellentunderstanding of thestrengths and weaknessesof SECONDARY dataset/datasources you have used.5 Evidence-basedrecommendationsto improve publichealth.Recommendationsproposed are sensible butlack clear links withspecific findings of thereport.Recommendations areevidence-based but arenot novel for the specifiedarea having already beenproposed in publisheddatasets/data sources.Recommendationsproposed are sensible andcould feasibly strengthenstrategies identified as beingsub-optimal.Recommendations aredescribed clearly andsupported by sounddatasets/data sources.Recommendationsproposed are wellthought-out and are likelyto strengthen strategiesidentified as being suboptimal within thespecified location.Recommendations areexplained in detail and aresupported by strongdatasets/data sources.Recommendationsproposed are insightful andsupported by sounddatasets/data sources.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.