PUBH6001: Health Policy & Advocacy | My Assignment Tutor

PUBH6001 Supplementary Assessment ASSESSMENT BRIEFSubject Code and TitlePUBH6001: Health Policy & AdvocacyAssessmentSupplementary AssessmentIndividual/GroupIndividualLength1000 wordsLearning OutcomesThis assessment addresses the following learning outcomes: Analyse different theories and approaches to policy agenda setting Apply knowledge of policy development to a public health policy issue Analyse issues in contemporary Australian health care policy Analyse evidence-based policy and knowledge translation issues Develop processes for the evaluation of and accountability forpolicy Critique the role of networks and coalitions in the policy agenda settingprocess Analyse advocacy and empowerment strategies used to address publichealth policy issuesSubmission Due DateSunday January 17th, 11:50pm (NSW time)Total MarksPass/Fail PUBH6001 Supplementary AssessmentTaskThis assessment consists of two parts and can be written in a report style.Part A (500 words): you will apply health policy theories to analyse Australia’s Fourth nationalmental health planPart B (500 words): you will analyse advocacy strategies best suited to mental health awareness andprovide examples.Resources to assist with this task can be found at these links Fourth national mental health plan: an agenda for collaborative government action in mentalhealth 2009-2014 Mental health organisations and advocacy groups InstructionsPART AUtilising Walt and Gilson’s Policy Analysis Triangle (1994), analyse the Fourth national mental healthpolicy. When discussing the context of this policy, include the agenda-setting phase that supportedthe development of the policy.PART BSearch the literature to identify effective advocacy strategies suitable to support mental healthawareness. Analyse these strategies to determine which method will lead to the outcomes that themental health policy is trying to achieve. Provide examples.Referencing:It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. You may useinformation from the readings and your own research to address this assessment; however, it isessential that you use appropriate APA style for citing. Please see more information on referencinghere Supplementary AssessmentMarking Rubric: Assessment AttributesFail (Unacceptable)0-49%Pass (Functional)50-64%Credit (Proficient)65-74%Distinction (Advanced)75-84%High Distinction(Exceptional)85-100%Knowledge &Understanding 45%Limited understandingof the topic. Key areashave not beenaddressed.Demonstratesknowledge of theassigned topic, and isable to summariseinformation, whichhighlights a basicunderstanding of thecontent.Thoroughunderstanding of thetopic, and demonstratesa capacity to explain andapply relevant concepts.All key areas have beenaddressedHighly developedunderstanding of thetopic. Has addressed allkey areas of theassessment in detail anddemonstrated a capacityto clearly explain allrelevant concepts.A sophisticatedunderstanding of thetopic. Has addressed allof the key concepts indetail and demonstrateda capacity to add insightand furtherunderstanding to theconcepts explored.Content & Reasoning45%Ideas are limited, and itisdifficult to distinguishmain ideas fromsupporting detail.Others ideas areaccepted without muchthought. Opinions maybe stated as facts.Is generally able todistinguish fact fromopinion, comments maybe repetitive, and ispositional with limitedsupporting evidence orexplanation.Student can distinguishfact from opinion and isable to contribute todiscussion with ideasand evidence whichcontinues themomentum ofdiscussion forum.Position is clear andmostly supported withevidence.Student understandsthe significant ideasrelevant to the issuebeing discussed, and isable to distinguish factfrom opinion,elaborating onstatements withspecific evidence tosupport explanations.Position is clear andcan use analogyeffectively.Student can distinguishfact from opinion andelaborates onstatements withaccurate, specificexplanations andevidence. The studentcan recognisecontradictions andirrelevant comments.Position is purposefuland without bias.Referencing & Citation10%Has not used referencesor uses poor qualityreferences to supportideas.APA referencing hasmultiple errors or hasnot been usedconsistently.Demonstrates use ofresearch sources tosupport and developideas, although theseare not consistentlyexplicit or welldeveloped.There are somemistakes using APAreferencing style.Demonstratesconsistent use of goodquality, credible andrelevant researchsources to support anddevelop ideas There areminor mistakes usingAPA referencing style.Consistentlydemonstrates expertuse of high quality,credible and relevantsources to supportwriting. Demonstratesevidence of readingbeyond the key texts.There are no mistakesor very minor mistakesusing APA referencingstyle.Demonstrates expertuse of diverse, highquality, credible andrelevant sources,which develop andsupport ideas in asophisticated manner.Extensive evidence ofreading beyond keytexts. There are nomistakes using APAreferencing style.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.