Read the original posts by your classmates in Workshop 1.3.(Attached documents)Choose two of your classmates’ original posts, selecting at least one student that presents an opposite or differing approach to the ethics of the Borland case than your thread.Each response must:Clearly identify similarities or differences in your posts.Support and defend your position.Identify and discuss, from the Chapter 1 reading, which shadow(s) Kahn exhibited and how do those shadows affect one of the stakeholders identified by the student whose thread you are replying to.Incorporate at least one scholarly source in addition to the textbook to support your conclusions and ideas, as well as the possible biblical application.Be at least 300 words in length or more.State reasons that support your conclusions, adding additional ideas/thoughts, or providing alternative ideas/thoughts.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS