PRESENTATION & STYLE | My Assignment Tutor

CRITERION80-100 Excellent70-79 Very good60-69 Good50-59 Sound40-49 Satisfactory20-39 Fail0-19 FailPRESENTATION & STYLECoherence and organisation of assignmentStrong organisation and coherence clearly enhances the work.Demonstrates logical organisation and coherence which enhances fulfilment of the assignment objectives.Demonstrates logical organisation and coherence.Demonstrates sound, conventional organisation.Shows limited organisation.Poorly presented and structured but partially understandable.Disorganised and/or incoherent.Clarity of expression (incl. accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuationWell-developed writing style, appropriate to assignment, which enhances the argument. Grammar and spelling accurate.Fluent writing style appropriate to the assignment. Grammar and spelling accurate.Language fluent. Grammar and spelling mainly accurateMeaning clear, but language not always fluent. Grammar and/or spelling contain errors.Generally understandable, but language contains errors which detract from the argument.Meaning often unclear and/or frequent errors in grammar and/or spelling.Meaning unclear. Poor spelling, grammar and punctuation.CONFORMING TO INSTRUCTIONSAttention to purposeAddresses the purpose of the assignment comprehensively and with some creativity.Addresses the full purpose of the assignment effectively.Addresses the main purpose of the assignment effectively.Addresses the main purpose of the assignment.Some of the work is focused on the aims and themes of the assignment.Mostly fails to address the task set.Fails to address the task set.ReferencingSources used are acknowledged in the text and reference list and used fluently to support discussion. Referencing follows a systematic approach, appropriate to the discipline. All elements of individual references are present.Sources used are acknowledged in the text and reference list and used effectively to support discussion. Referencing follows a systematic approach, appropriate to the discipline. All elements of individual references are present.Sources used are acknowledged in the text and reference list and used to support discussion. Referencing follows a systematic approach, appropriate to the discipline. All elements of individual references are present.Sources used are acknowledged in the text and reference list. Referencing follows a systematic approach, appropriate to the discipline. Most elements of individual references are present.Sources of information acknowledged but integration between text and reference list is inconsistent. Attempts to follow systematic approach, appropriate to the discipline. Some elements of individual references may be incomplete and/or absent.Some sources of information acknowledged but links between text and reference list unclear. Referencing does not follow a systematic approach. Elements of individual references incomplete and/or absent.Little or no acknowledgement of sources of information in text and/or reference list.CONTENT AND KNOWLEDGEUse of literature/evidence of readingDemonstrates broad and / or in-depth independent reading from appropriate sources. Choice of sources enhances fulfilment of the assignment objectives. Clear, accurate, systematic application of material with developed / integrated critical appraisal.Evidence of broad and / or in-depth independent reading from appropriate sources. Rationale for choice of sources clear. Clear, accurate, coherent application of material, with developing critical appraisal.Evidence of independent reading from a wide range of appropriate sources. Clear, accurate application of material. Shows some ability to appraise material critically.Evidence of independent reading from an appropriate range of sources. Sound application of literature.Limited evidence of independent reading. Literature is presented in a descriptive way.Very limited evidence of independent reading / inappropriate sources used / engagement with the literature very superficial.Little or no evidence of engagement with relevant literature.THINKING / ANALYSIS / CONCLUSION`Critical reasoningWell-developed, critical evaluation of theories / concepts / assumptions / data which informs the overall approach taken to the assignment. Arguments are clear, coherent, tenable, and demonstrate some originality.Developed, theoretically / conceptually informed critical thinking is integrated into the work. Arguments demonstrate the ability to evaluate theories / concepts / assumptions / data.Demonstrates good critical insight and ability to contrast alternative positions through the use of theory.Demonstrates conventional critical insight and ability to contrast alternative positions.Demonstrates limited critical insight. Recognises alternative positions.Critical thought / analysis very limited and / or incoherent.No evidence of critical thought.PRACTICAL/ INTERPERSONAL SKILLSReflective practiceAnalyses practice by critically reflecting on personal contributions and that of others and the rationale behind these. Utilises imaginative thinking about potential alternatives and their implications for further practice in a range of contexts.Analyses personal contribution and that of others to practice through reflection and considers possibilities and their consequences to develop appropriate actions.Evaluates personal contribution and that of others to practice and develops plans of action for practice.Able to evaluate own practice and that of others using a number of frames of reference. Considers future actionsAble to interpret own practice and that of others based on specific frames of reference. Identifies some further actions.Limited interpretation of own practice and that of others restricting further action.Incomplete interpretation of practice leading to insufficient action

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *