ASSESSMENT TASK 3: KM STRATEGY | My Assignment Tutor

Hi.. The deadline will be decided after gettingthe feedback from the lecturer about theproposal.ASSESSMENT TASK 3: KM STRATEGYLength: 3000 words.RATIONALEThe aim of Assessment Task 3 is to enable you to demonstrate that you have a broad understanding ofthe theory and practice of knowledge management (KM). By completing the assessment task, you willhave an opportunity to take the theoretical concepts covered during the course and consider how thesemight be applied in an organisational setting. Specifically, Assessment Task 3 requires you to develop aKM strategy for an organisation.The course learning outcomes (CLO) addressed in this assessment task are:• CLO1: Analyse and explain the developments in the ‘new economy’ and in particular the place andnature of knowledge in such developments• CLO2: Demonstrate a broad, critical and practical understanding of KM theories and practices in thereal world.• CLO3: Investigate the linkages between management and KM and in particular of those between KMand strategic and human resources management• CLO4: Examine the various human, organisational and technological components that together combineto produce KM• CLO5: Explore the role and place of information and communications technologies in the practice of KM• CLO6: Develop a KM strategy for an organisation.GENERAL GUIDELINESIt is envisaged that this assessment task will result in the development of a professional KM strategy. Thestrategy should draw upon the material studied in each of the ten topics covered across the semester–of course depending on the organisation selected, the emphasis on each topic is likely to vary.The word limit for this assessment task is 3000 words (including in-text references, tables, figures, andappendices but excluding the reference list).You should ensure that you are able to acquire sufficient information on your chosen organisation inorder to enable a meaningful KM strategy to be developed. Such information might be sought fromsecondary sources such as case studies in textbooks, or insights provided by corporate websites. With thepermission of appropriate personnel at the selected organisation, you may also elect to conductinterviews or surveys with key employees– a process which one would expect to occur in developing sucha strategy in a “real-world” setting.Assessment Task 3 should be based on the KM strategy proposal you submitted for Assessment Task 1.Suggested Structure for the KM StrategyThe following is designed to provide general guidance as to the structure of the KM strategy. However,this is a suggestion only and by no means should limit your creativity when constructing your own KMstrategy:• Introduction and background to the organisation• Overview of approach and methods used in developing the KM strategy• Strategic and Knowledge Gap Analysis (i.e. current vs. desired state)o Operational infrastructureo Technological infrastructureo Cultural infrastructure• KM Recommendations and/or KM Roadmapo Operational infrastructureo Technological infrastructureo Cultural infrastructure• Closing statement• References• AppendicesRUBRIC/MARKING GUIDELINESThe marking criteria will consider your understanding of the relevant KM theories, concepts and issuescovered in the weekly topics throughout the semester, and your ability to think about the practicalimplications of these theories and issues in organisational settings. Specific marking criteria for the KMStrategy will emphasise (i) the quality of the analysis conducted on the current state of the caseorganisation and its current KM initiatives and; (ii) the quality of the recommendations you make for thecase organisation’s future KM initiatives.Learning to communicate comprehensive information in a concise manner is an important skill andtherefore penalties will be applied for exceeding the word limit. Such penalties might include either areduction in the marks awarded, or alternatively, that only the first 3000 words will be marked.GRADE CRITERIAHigh Distinction 80 – 100%Exceptionally clear understanding of subject matter and appreciation of issues; well organised,formulated, and sustained arguments; well thought out and structured diagrams; relevant literaturereferenced. Evidence of creative insight and originality in terms of comprehension, application, andanalysis with at least some synthesis and evaluation.Hi..Please send me the name of the organization (or list of organizations) for which you intendto develop a knowledge management strategy before you starting to write the proposal toobtain approval from the lecturer.The organization is not necessarily to be large (if it is large, you can choose a department orteam within this organization).You can choose a medium or small organization that you are familiar with, and preferablyyou have access to it.The most important thing is to be able to effectively and well develop its knowledgemanagement strategy for the chosen organization.You can chat with me in the chat box or by email. KM StrategyLevels of AchievementCriteriaMarks80-100%Introduction and OrganisationalContext10.0Excellent introduction andorganisational context provided (industry, objectives, structure etc.)Approach andMethods5.0Excellent explanation of approach(methods, data sources etc.)Gap Analysis: Operational Infrastructure12.5Analysis demonstrates an excellent level of breadth and depth to reveal all ofthe KM issuesfaced by the organisation.Completely supported by suitablereferences/empirical evidence.Gap Analysis: Technological Infrastructure12.5Analysis demonstrates an excellent level of breadth and depth to reveal all ofthe KM issuesfaced by the organisation.Completely supported by suitablereferences/empirical evidence.Gap Analysis: Cultural Infrastructure12.5Analysis demonstrates an excellent level of breadth and depth to reveal all ofthe KM issuesfaced by the organisation.Completely supported by suitablereferences/empirical evidence.Recommendations: Operational Infrastructure12.5Solutions address all of the issuesidentified in the gap analysis and comprisean excellent level of detail. Completely supported bysuitable references/empiricalevidenceRecommendations: Technological Infrastructure12.5Solutions address all of the issuesidentified in the gap analysis and comprisean excellent level of detail. Completely supported bysuitable references/empiricalevidenceRecommendations: Cultural Infrastructure12.5Solutions address all of the issuesidentified in the gap analysis and comprisean excellent level of detail. Completely supported bysuitable references/empiricalevidenceStructure, presentation and alignment10.0Excellent logical structure, presentation and alignment

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *