choose an organisation or business | My Assignment Tutor

Individual essay (80%): this is an individual assignment as an essay in 2000 words. You must choose an organisation or business like an automotive company (in manufacturing industry) or a hospital (in service sector). You are not supposed to choose any company which we are dealing with in seminars like Arnold Palmer hospital or Frito Lay. You need to produce an essay elaborating on the key operation, logistics and supply chain management issues faced by the operations and supply chain manager(s) in this particular organisation / business.  You can collect data from resources like websites, books, journal articles and grey reports. Some case studies are available to help you collect required data.  By focusing on the operational and supply chain issues, you should seek to identify and clarify how the operation functions and supports the market that it serves. What service delivery system (s) or manufacturing process (es) does it use? What infrastructure does it use to manage these delivery systems? And how, together, do these support the market (s) that it serves? A critical, detailed and relevant analysis should be made of the various components.  Based on your analysis, you are expected to make recommendations about how the business can improve its performance. Consider triple bottom line – described as the incorporation of economic, environmental and social factors as the three dimensions of sustainability in business practice – in your analysis.  As it might be impossible to analyse all the areas of operations, logistics and supply chain management, you should also decide which area (s) to cover in your discussion. Therefore, choose two of the following list in managing operations, logistics and supply chain.  New product/ service development and process Managing qualityLocation and LayoutManaging people in operation and supply chainsLogistics mix: Channels, networks, transportation, managing inventory and capacityManaging business relationships in supply chainsJIT and Lean  To conduct writing the essay, students need to read and refer to core text books and academic journals as well as source of their data collection (mentioned before).   The essay will be assessed according to the following criteria: Introduction (10%)Review of relevant Operation, Logistics and Supply Chain Management theories (30%)        Critical analytic discussion with relevant and similar example(s) and applying appropriate solutions of Operations Management (30%)Conclusion and recommendation (20%)Clarity of writing, essay structure, correct referencing (10%)  Formative Assessment You should write down an essay plan (500 words) to introduce  selected business/ organisationtwo selected areas of Operations and Supply Chain Management theories and techniques that should be appliedpotential areas of improvement which need to be reviewed critically You should email the essay plan to your seminar tutor in week 4. You can book an appointment with your seminar tutor in week 5 (reading week) to receive individual feedback and discuss your essay plan. How will we support you with your assessment? Two dedicated seminars in week three and tenFormative feedback on case studies in seminarFormative assessment: writing an essay plan in week 4Links to the assessment throughout your seminars and team-building session specificallyCoursework tutorials with your seminar tutor during reading week and revision weekCoursework tutorial at week 11 FAQs on Moodle  How will your work be assessed? Your work will be assessed by a subject expert who will use the marking grid provided in this assessment brief.  When you access your marked coursework it is important that you reflect on the feedback so that you can use it to improve future assignments. Referencing You MUST use the Harvard System.  The Harvard system is very easy to use once you become familiar with it. Assignment submissions The Business School requires a digital version of all assignment submissions.  These must be submitted via Turnitin on the module’s Moodle site.  They must be submitted as a Word file (not as a pdf) and must not include scanned in text or text boxes.  They must be submitted by 2pm on the given date.  For further general details on coursework preparation refer to the online information via StudentZone http://studentzone.roehampton.ac.uk/howtostudy/index.html.  Resit on-line test date: TBC The instruction for the resit online test will be as same as the original online test. Please check the Moodle for more information. Resit submission date: TBC  For students who are offered a resit you are required to improve and resubmit your original work as well as adding a further reflective commentary discussing what you have learned from the process.  You must resubmit your work using the specific resit Turnitin link on Moodle. You should: Review your previously submitted work and read carefully the feedback given by the marker.Use this feedback to help you revisit and rewrite your work, improving it in the areas identified as weak in the original marking processInclude with your resubmission an additional reflective piece (up to 300/500 words#) on what you understand was weak, how you set about addressing this and what you have learned from this that may help you with further assignments. You should address the following specifically: i) Identify tutor feedback points on your original work and identify where/how the resit work has changed (give page number) in response to feedback ii) Identify the lessons you have learnt from doing the resit iii) Reflect on how your feedback and this process will help you improve future assignments If you did not submit work at the first opportunity you cannot reflect on your feedback. However, you are still required to submit a reflective piece in which you identify your reasons for non-submission, the implications of non-submission for your future success and how you propose to address this in the future. If you have issues with confidentiality of your reasons for non-submission then you could reflect on how you have met the learning outcomes for the module, how you can use what you have done on the module to support your future career and what skills/employability attributes you feel the module has helped you to develop. If you were deferred at the first assessment opportunity you do not need to include the reflective piece as this is a first submission at a later date, not a resit. The original marking criteria will still apply (see marking grid provided above*) except that the 10% weighting for presentation will be awarded instead to your reflective piece Mitigating circumstances/what to do if you cannot submit a piece of work or attend your presentation The University Mitigating Circumstances Policy can be found on the University website –  Mitigating  Circumstances Policy Marking and feedback process Between you handing in your work and then receiving your feedback and marks within 20 working days, there are a number of quality assurance processes that we go through to ensure that students receive marks which reflects their work. A brief summary is provided below. Step One – The module and marking team meet to agree standards, expectations and how feedback will be provided.Step Two – A subject expert will mark your work using the criteria provided in the assessment brief.Step Three – A moderation meeting takes place where all members of the teaching and marking team will review the marking of others to confirm whether they agree with the mark and feedback Step Four – Work at Levels 5 and 6 then goes to an external examiner who will review a sample of work to confirm that the marking between different staff is consistent and fair Step Five – Your mark and feedback is processed by the Office and made available to you. Rubric for understanding operations, logistics and supply chain management assessment  100(80-89) 85(70-79) 75(60-69) 65(50-59) 55(40-49) 45(30 – 39) 35(20 – 29) 250Introduction – 10%          Introduction: Outstandingly clear introduction encompassing key points which will be discussed as well as motivation of selecting the business.  Introduction: Excellent introduction encompassing key points which will be discussed.Introduction: very good introduction encompassing almost all raised points of the essayIntroduction: Good introduction encompassing key raised points of the essay.Introduction: Limited but satisfactory introducing the work.Introduction: Some basic Introduction drawn from the work but some part are missed.Introduction: Limited Introduction drawn, and often reader has to find these within the work.Introduction: very limited information in Introduction drawn.Introduction: None providedReview & Research – 30%Breadth and relevance of research:    Research includes Operations Management journals, core and essential text books from the reading list and web sources and grey reports. BibliographyBreadth and relevance of research:    Research includes Operations Management journals, core and essential text books from the reading list and web sources and grey reports.Breadth and relevance of research:    Research includes Operations Management journals, core and essential text books from the reading list and web sources.Breadth and relevance of research:    Research includes some academic journals and text books from the reading list. Scope for more breadth thoughBreadth and relevance of research:    Research includes competent attempt at one or two academic journals, text books and online sources. More breadth needed.Breadth and relevance of research:    Limited research often not including academic journals or text books.Breadth and relevance of research:    Little attempt made at researching the topic. A few websites or a couple of books cited.Breadth and relevance of research:    Little attempt made at researching the topic. For example, just a website or a text book citedBreadth and relevance of research:    No attempt made at researching the topic using texts, academic journals and online sources  and citation are very strong.        Critical Analysis – 30%Level of analysis/ application of theory:    Outstanding analysis relating to the question. Analysis is always supported by academic theory. Some good examples support the importance of mentionedLevel of analysis/ application of theory:    Excellent analysis relating to the question. Analysis is always supported by academic theory.Level of analysis/ application of theory:    Very good analysis relating to the question. Analysis is supported by academic theory well.Level of analysis/ application of theory:    Good analysis relating to the question. Most analysis is supported by academic theory.Level of analysis/ application of theory:    A general analysis sometimes related to the question. Key issues are loosely mentioned and the correct application of academic theory is limited.Level of analysis/ application of theory:    A weak analysis occasionally related to the question. Application of academic theory is extremely limited.Level of analysis/ application of theory:    Assignment covers some answers to the questions set but lacks focus. Application to academic theory is limited.Level of analysis/ application of theory:    Assignment struggles to answer the actual question set. It is barely on topic and lacks application to academic theory to support points.Level of analysis/ application of theory:    No attempt to answer the question.  theory.        Conclusions – 20%                        Conclusions: Outstandingly clear concluding comments encompassing key points made as well as some good practical suggestions.Conclusions: Excellent clear concluding comments encompassing key points made. A few suggestions are made.Conclusions: Very good concluding comments encompassing key points made. Two suggestions are made.Conclusions: Good concluding comments encompassing key points made. One suggestion is made. Conclusions: Limited but satisfactory concluding comments offered which attempt to close the essay.Conclusions: Some basic conclusions drawn from the work but no real summary offered.Conclusions: Limited conclusions drawn, and often reader has to find these within the work.Conclusions:  conclusion is some repetitive sentences.Conclusions: None providedStructure – 10%Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:    Writing style is clear and concise.  Assignment is written with an academic tone and wellstructured. Grammar and punctuation are Excellent. Harvard referencing system and citation style are correct. There is no room for improvement! Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:    Writing style is clear and concise.  Assignment is written with an academic tone and wellstructured. Grammar and punctuation are Excellent. Harvard referencing system and citation style is correct.Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:    Writing style is clear. Assignment is written with an academic tone and wellstructured. Grammar and punctuation are generally very good. Harvard referencing system and citation style are mostly correctClarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:    Writing style is clear and points are fairly well made. Assignment has attempted to use an academic tone. Grammar and punctuation are good. Harvard referencing system and citation style is mostly correct. Some structural issues may be apparent.Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:    Writing style is competent but more work needed on ensuring the structure is suitable and that points are well communicated. Harvard referencing needs improvement.Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:    Writing style is quite difficult to follow and structural issues apparent. More effort needed on writing with an academic tone and grammar and punctuation could be improved. Harvard referencing needs improvement.Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:    Writing style is difficult to read and understand. Poor attempt at correctly referencing using the Harvard style. Haphazard structure of assignment.Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:    Writing style is difficult to read and understand. No attempt at correctly referencing using the Harvard style. Haphazard structure of assignment.Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:    None evident

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *