UO Construction 1 – Assessment 1 Rubric | My Assignment Tutor

UO Construction 1 – Assessment 1 Rubric: House Study Report CriteriaOutstanding performanceHD/DExceeds requirementsCMeets core requirementsP1/P2Fails to meet requirementsF1/F2Part A: House Study (40% of course grade)Selects and describes activities thatdemonstrate an understanding ofsubstructure elements and how theyare sequenced and coordinated inresidential buildings.CO2. CO3. CO5.(Weight 25%)Completely explains the sequence andcoordination of ‘substructure’ activitiesand best practices of domestic houseconstruction.Routinely explains the sequence andcoordination of ‘substructure’ activitiesand best practices of domestic houseconstruction.Adequately explains the sequence of‘substructure’ activities and attempts toexplain best practices of domestichouse construction.Unclear explanation of sequenced‘substructure’ activities and bestpractices of domestic houseconstruction.ObservationsCO2. CO3. CO5.(Weight 20%)Insightful connections to observedexamples on the building site (and/orcomparable sites) and/or documentationand plans to comprehensively identifythe substructure components.Excellent connections to observedexamples on the building site (and/orcomparable sites) and/or documentationand plans identify the substructurecomponents.Makes connections to the observedbuilding site (and/or comparable sites)and/or documentation and plans toadequately identify the substructurecomponents.Minimal identification the substructurecomponents of the building site and veryfew links to observed examples and/ordocumentation and plans.Quality/Relevant InformationalSourcesCO2. CO3. CO5.(Weight 15%)CO1. CO2, CO3, CO4, CO5.Extensive research demonstrating widereading of quality and importantsources, including standards andregulations, plans, specifications,reports, council documents etc.Research demonstrates wide reading ofimportant sources, including standardsand regulations, plans, specifications,reports, council documents etc.Research demonstrates reading ofsome key sources but not all.Research demonstrates minimal readingof key sources.Technical TerminologyCO2. CO3. CO5.(Weight 10%)Outstanding use of technicalterminology.Competent use of technical terminology.Appropriate use of technical terminologyin most instances.Lacks use of technical terminology.Written Communication (GQ 3)(Weight 10%)Clearly expressed using academiclanguage (grammar, spelling andpunctuation).Expressed with clarity using academiclanguage (grammar, spelling andpunctuation).Expression are unclear with minimalacademic language (grammar, spellingand punctuation).Expression are unclear with limitedacademic language (grammar, spellingand punctuation).UniSA Harvard Referencing (GQ 6)(Weight 10%)Referencing is faultless in in-text citationand reference list UniSA Harvard style.Referencing is almost faultless in in-textcitation and reference list with few errorsUniSA Harvard style.Referencing has some errors in in-textcitation and reference list with few errorsUniSA Harvard style.Limited or no adherence to UniSAHarvard style in in-text citation andreference list.Formatting (GQ 6)(Weight 5%)Professionally formatted, covering allrequired elementsLegibly formatted covering requiredelements.Appropriately formatted coveringelements.Poorly formatted covering elements. UO Construction 1 – Assessment 1 Rubric: House Study Report Presentation (GQ 6)(Weight 5%)Professionally presented with excellentlinks to labelled photographs, diagrams,documentation and/or plans.Legibly formatted and presented withgood links to labelled photographs,diagrams, documentation and/or plans.Appropriately formatted and presentedwith some links to labelled photographs,diagrams, documentation and/or plans.Poorly formatted and presented with nolinks to labelled photographs, diagrams,documentation and/or plans.Feedback CommentsGradeNotationNotational %Grade DescriptionAssessment Mark/GradeHigh distinctionHD85–100An exceptional submission in every regardDistinctionD75–84A good submission exhibiting high quality work in most areasCreditC65–74A sound submission exhibiting high quality work in some areasPass level 1P155–64A sound submissionPass level 2P250–54Just passableFail level 1F140–49Not passable – some areas requiring significant improvementFail level 2F2Below 40Not passable – most areas requiring significant improvement

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *