UO Construction 1 – Assessment 2 | My Assignment Tutor

UO Construction 1 – Assessment 2: Project – Part A and B CriteriaOutstanding performanceHD/DExceeds requirementsCMeets core requirementsP1/P2Fails to meet requirementsF1/F2Part A: Construction of Wall and Roof Model (30% of course grade)Constructs a model of a typicaldomestic roof construction.(Weight 30%)CO 3, 5.Constructs a sophisticated model that isconsistent to the plan and depicts allcomponents of a typical domestic roofconstruction and their accurate placement.Constructs a comprehensive model thatis consistent to the plan and depicts allrelevant components of a typicaldomestic roof construction and theiraccurate placement.Constructs an acceptable model that isrelatively consistent to the plan anddepicts most components of a typicaldomestic roof construction and theirappropriate placement.Model lacks consistency to the plan anddepicts very few components of a typicaldomestic roof construction which are notalways accurately placed.Constructs a model of a typicaldomestic wall frame.(Weight 20%)CO 3, 5.Constructs a sophisticated model that isconsistent to the plan and depicts allcomponents of a typical domestic wallframe and their accurate placement.Constructs a comprehensive model thatis consistent to the plan and depicts allrelevant components of a typicaldomestic wall frame and their accurateplacement.Constructs an acceptable model that isrelatively consistent to the plan anddepicts most components of a typicaldomestic roof construction and theirappropriate placement.Model lacks consistency to the plan anddepicts very few components of a typicaldomestic roof construction which are notalways accurately placed.Method of assembly.(Weight 15%)CO 3, 5.Insightful application of mathematicalmethods and accurate calculations indesign and scaleApplies mathematical methodsappropriately and accurate calculationsin design and scale.Mostly applies mathematical methodsappropriately and most calculations indesign and scale are accurate.Mathematical methods and calculationsare not well developed in design andscale.Presentation.(Weight 5%)GQ 6.Outstanding attention to detail andneatness in the presentation of the model.Attention to detail and neatness in thepresentation of the model exceedsexpectations.Acceptable attention to detail andneatness in the presentation of themodel.Little or no attention to detail,presentation is not neat.Identification.(Weight 5%)CO 3, 5.Clearly identifies all components andmembers with annotated labelling in allinstances.Identifies all relevant components andmembers with annotated labelling.Identifies most components andremembers with annotated labelling inmost instances.Neglects to identify very fewcomponents and members withannotated labelling.Part B: Works Schedule (10% of course grade)Creates a works schedule toexplain the tasks involved.CO 3, 5.(Weight 15%)Clearly identifies and succinctly explains(using appropriate terminology in allinstances) the many tasks involved toeffectively carry out the project.Identifies and explains (usingappropriate terminology) the many tasksinvolved to effectively carry out theproject.Identifies and explains (usingappropriate terminology in mostinstances) most of the tasks involved toeffectively carry out the project.Minimal identification of the tasksinvolved to effectively carry out theproject, thus scheduling is difficult tocomprehensively document.Creates a works schedule tosequence and coordinate thetasks involved.Insightfully schedules all tasks in a timelyand well-coordinated sequence.Comprehensively schedules all tasks ina timely and coordinated sequence.Schedules tasks with few errors injudgement regarding time andcoordination.Neglects to log all the critical facets ofthe project processes. UO Construction 1 – Assessment 2: Project – Part A and B CO 3, 5.(Weight 10%)Feedback CommentsGradeNotationNotational %Grade DescriptionAssessment Mark/GradeHigh distinctionHD85–100An exceptional submission in every regardDistinctionD75–84A good submission exhibiting high quality work in most areasCreditC65–74A sound submission exhibiting high quality work in some areasPass level 1P155–64A sound submissionPass level 2P250–54Just passableFail level 1F140–49Not passable – some areas requiring significant improvementFail level 2F2Below 40Not passable – most areas requiring significant improvement

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *