Evidence required and unit learning Outcomes | My Assignment Tutor

Assessment Task 1 Individual Assignment Assessment instructionsDue Date: Week 7, Friday 25th April 2021, 11:59pm. Weighting: 50% Submission: Moodle online Format: One file in .doc or .docx (MSWord) format. Submissions in any other file format (e.g. .zip) will be treated as a non-submission. Font type: Arial or Times New Roman Font size: 12 points Line space: No line spacing (0 point) Page margin: No indent (0 cm) Word limit: 3000 words total (10% +/- is acceptable) Referencing style – see Ozford policy Style – Questions/Answer format Late submission:. Email to the unit coordinator an extension request – see Moodle for more detailsEvidence required and unit learning OutcomesSubmission of a written assignment online based on the following unit learning outcomes: Explain and appraise the sources of taxation law within Australia (Q2) Analyse and research complex problems relating to Australian Taxation Law demonstrating high level research skills (Q1 & Q2) Critically assess issues relating to Australian Taxation Law and generate appropriate responses (Q1 & Q2) Demonstrate an ability to work independently (Q1 & Q2) and to participate in group discussions.Assessment conditionsReview the law, analyse questions and case studies, and write your answer. If you are unsure of what is expected of you or the standards to which work must be completed, you may discuss this with your lecturer.Materials and resources requiredTo be deemed knowledgeable in this unit, you will require access to a range of information as listed below: gather, convey and receive information and ideas use legislation and case law analyse questions and hypothetical case studiesReasonable adjustmentsIn the event that you have difficulty understanding the assessment tasks due to language or other difficulties, your lecturer will attempt to make reasonable adjustments to the assessment paper in order to afford you every opportunity to achieve proficiency.Decision making rulesConsider: Research – Source material Content/Analysis – Arguments and conclusions Structure – Format Language/Presentation – Grammar Referencing – Evidence QUESTION 1 Advise your client on how the following items will be treated for tax purposes under Australian tax law and state the reason for your advice: Qantas frequent flyer points received by a business analyst employed by a large business consultancy firm in relation to work related travel paid for by the firm. amounts received by a computer hire company from its customers for a damaged computer. free overseas holiday received by a licensed cafe manager from an alcohol supplier. the return to its members of excess funds raised by a cricket club for the purchase of additional cricket bats. a payment made by a radio station to an Australian tennis player for being named the Australian sports person of the year 2020. Expenses relating to an accounting qualification for a receptionist working at an accounting firm. Expenses relating to a short course in hotel management in the hope of becoming a hotel manager. Expenses relating to work suits and work dresses. Expenses relating to travel between work and home. Expenses relating to travel between one employer and another employer. QUESTION 2 Bibash is an international student studying an accounting degree at Ozford College. He commenced his studies in term 1, 2019. In the 2019/2020 financial year he worked part time as an office assistant at an Accountant’s office to gain work experience in his chosen career and made $40,000 from that job. Bibash also received $15,000 from his parents to assist him with his living expenses, and a $7,000 distribution from a trust account set up in India by his grandfather of which he paid $1,000 in foreign tax. He spent $8,500 on his studies, $1,000 on a computer and printer for educational purposes, and $500 on a new mobile which was required for work purposes. Calculate Bibash’s net tax payable for the 2019/2020 financial year, making reference to the taxation formula, the reasons for including or excluding specific items, your calculations, and the applicable tax law (sections of legislation and/or case law). LAW3100: Taxation Law / Trimester 1, 2021 Individual Assignment Rubric Marking CriteriaHigh Distinction (17-20)Distinction (15-16.5)Credit (13-14.5)Pass (10-12.5)Fail (0-9.5)Research / 20Comprehensive research is indicated. Professional use of sources to support ideas, well-integrated, sources are credible. Very minor, if any, weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/application.Thorough research is indicated. Very good use of sources to support ideas, well-integrated, sources are credible. May be minor weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/application.Research is generally thorough. Good use of sources to support ideas, mostly well integrated, sources are credible. May be weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/application.Basic and sound research. Basic use of sources to support ideas, generally well-integrated, most sources are credible. May be weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/application.Little evidence of research. Sources are missing, inappropriate, poorly integrated or lacking credibility. Lacks clear link of sources to arguments.High Distinction (27-30)Distinction (23-26.5)Credit (19-22.5)Pass (15-18.5)Fail (0-14.5)Content/ Analysis / 30Professional standard. Arguments and conclusions are very coherent and flows well; topic is addressed thoroughly. External research on concepts relevant to the case material is of outstanding quality; the concepts are analysed in great depth. Very minor, if any, inconsistencies and weaknesses with flow.Is very coherent and flows well; topic is addressed quite well. External research on concepts relevant to the case material is obvious; the concepts are analysed in depth. There may be minor inconsistencies and weaknesses with flow.Is coherent and flows well; topic is addressed quite well. External research on concepts relevant to the case material is obvious; the concepts are analysed quite well. There may be some inconsistencies/weaknesses with flow.Is generally coherent; topic is addressed to a reasonable depth with some description. External research on concepts relevant to the case material is somehow obvious; the concepts are analysed to a reasonable depth. There are some inconsistencies / weaknesses with the flow.Lacks coherence; topic is poorly addressed; little analysis. No evidence from external research to support the case material. The discussion is descriptive and poorly sequenced.High Distinction (17-20)Distinction (15-16.5)Credit (13-14.5)Pass (10-12.5)Fail (0-9.5)Structure / 20Correct academic format; all sections are included; the information under the sections corresponds to the requirements. Recommendations do suggest specific actions and derive from the discussion.The report format is correct; all sections are included; the information under the sections corresponds to the requirements. Recommendations do not suggest specific actions and do not derive from the discussion. Recommendations are missing.The report format is almost correct; the information under the sections correspond to almost all the requirements. Recommendations are missing or do not suggest specific actions.The report format is generally correct; the information under the sections does not completely correspond to the requirements.The report is not appropriately formatted; more than two of the required sections are missing.High Distinction (13.5-15)Distinction (11.5-13)Credit (9.5-11)Pass (7.5-9)Fail (0-7)Language/ Presentation / 15Academic standard; no errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling.Very good standard of writing; very few or minor errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling.Good standard of writing; few errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling.Basic and sound standard of writing; some errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling.Poor standard of writing. Word limit may not be adhered to.High Distinction (13.5-15)Distinction (11.5-13)Credit (9.5-11)Pass (7.5-9)Fail (0-7)Referencing / 15Academic level of referencing and acknowledgment; no errors of style evident. Thorough and consistent reference list and all reference listed.Very good attempt to reference sources; very minor inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Thorough and consistent reference list and all references listed.Good attempt to reference sources; inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Few inaccuracies in reference list and all references listed.Basic and sound attempt to reference resources; may be some inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Reference list is generally complete with 1 or 2 references missing.No referencing is evident or, if done, is inconsistent and technically incorrect. No or minimal reference list, mixed styles.Total /100Percentage /50Comments:

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.