Assessment Brief: SBM1203 Venture, Project Economics and FinanceTrimester 1, 2021Assessment Overview Assessment TaskTypeWeightLengthDueULOs AssessedAssessment 1: Online QuizzesWeekly online quizzes evaluating conceptual and practicalaspects of the studies.Individual40%30 MinuteseachWeek 2 toWeek 10ULO 1Assessment 2: Group Pecha Kucha Case study presentationWorking in groups, students require to present their analysis ofproject and venture appraisal business case studyGroup30%20 slides400 secondpresentationWeek 8ULO2ULO3ULO4Assessment 3: Business Case studyA case study related to Individual assignment on analysing real-world(simulated) financial data and information and interpreting theoutcomes using the concept and principles of finance you have learntin this unit.Individual30%2500 – 3000wordsWeek 11ULO1ULO2ULO3ULO4 Assessment 1: Weekly Online Quizzes Due date:Week 2 to Week 10Group/individual:IndividualWord count/Time provided:30 Minutes eachWeighting:40%Unit Learning Outcomes:ULO 1 Assessment 1 DetailOn-line quizzes will be conducted in weeks 2 to 9 inclusive. Some will be conducted in class time whileothers will be out of class time. Whether the quiz is in class or out of class time will be announced inclass each week along with the duration of the quiz. Students should therefore be prepared tocomplete the quiz in class each week. Each quiz will be worth 5% of the final mark with only the best8 results contributing to the final mark. The maximum mark for this assessment is 40% .Marking Information: The maximum mark for this assess assessment is 40% .Assessment 2: Pecha Kucha Case Study Presentation Due date:Week 8Group/individual:GroupWord count/Time provided:20 Slides, 20 seconds per slide – presentation in classWeighting:30%Unit Learning Outcomes:ULO 2; ULO 3; ULO 4 Assessment 2 DetailPecha kucha is loosely translated from Japanese as ‘chit-chat’. Groups of 3 or 4 will be formed inweek 2 and will be assigned a case study or provide their own. In the later case, the UnitCoordinators approval will be required before proceeding. The assessment is designed to assessyour technical, financial, economical and analytical skills in planning , evaluating and implementinga project effectively and efficiently. Your team will complete a project viability presentation on thecase.No written report is required. Rather, teams will present their report in a Pecha kucha format ie:exactly 20 slides (not including the title slide) delived in a time of 6 minutes 20 seconds for thepresentation (average of 20 seconds per slide). Marks will be deducted for reports that do notmeet these criteria.The presentation should cover (as a minimum) a description of the project, alternative approaches ifany, assumptions, risks, financial analysis, sensitivity analysis and recommended action.Assessments 2 Marking Criteria and RubricThe assessment will be marked out of 100% and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark. Themarking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.Assessment 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric Marking CriteriaNot Satisfactory(0-49% of the criterionmark)Satisfactory(50-64% of the criterionmark)Good(65-74% of the criterionmark)Very Good(75-84% of the criterionmark)Excellent(85-100% of the criterionmark)Personal ProfessionalPresentation10%Late, unprepared, untidyOn time, prepared, nervous,eye contact, dress code: ok.On time, prepared, confident,eye contact, dress code:smart.On time, prepared, confident,eye contact, dress code: verysmart.Early, prepared, confident, eyecontact, dress code:impeccable.Delivery30%Looks disinterested, noeye contact, reads fromnotes.Inaudible.Holds little eye contactwith audience, as entirereport is read fromnotes. Speaks in lowvolume and/ormonotonous tone,which causes audienceto disengageDisplays some eyecontact with audience,while reading occasionallyfrom the notes.Speaks with satisfactoryvariation of volume andinflectionConsistent use of direct eyecontact with audience, withlittle or no use of notes.Speaks with higher thansatisfactory variation ofvolume and inflectionHolds attention of entireaudience with the use of directeye contact, seldom looking atnotesSpeaks with fluctuation involume and inflection tomaintain audience interest andemphasize key pointsContent, Organisationand Understanding ofResearch35%Presentation shows noknowledge of topicPerson is not preparedHas little grasp ofinformation and is able toanswer only rudimentaryquestions. Does notclearly define subjectand purpose; providesweak support of subject;gives insufficient supportfor ideas or conclusionsIs comfortable withinformation and is ableto answer questionsAttempts to define purposeand subject; providesexamples, facts, and/orstatistics, at an abovesatisfactory level.Is at ease with expectedanswers to all questions,without elaborationHas clear purpose andsubject; examples, facts,and/or statistics that supportthe subject; includes data orevidence that supportsconclusions.Demonstrates full knowledgeby answering all classquestions with explanations &elaboration.Provides clear purpose andsubject; pertinent examples,facts, and/or statistics; supportsconclusions/ ideas withevidence.AudienceEngagement15%Disinterested in topic.Distracts audience whileother team memberspresent.Shows little interest intopic presentedRaises audienceunderstanding andknowledge of some points.Shows mixed feelingsabout the topic beingpresentedRaises audienceunderstanding & knowledgeof the subject area.Shows enthusiastic feelingsabout topicRaises audienceunderstanding & awarenessof most points.Demonstrates strongenthusiasm about topic duringentire presentationSignificantly increasesaudience understanding &knowledge of topic.Compliance withspecifications10%Little complianceSome compliance20 slides 400 seconds ± 50%Reasonably compliant20 slides 400 seconds ± 25%Largely compliant20 slides 400 seconds ± 15%Full compliance20 slides 400 seconds ± 5% Assessment 3: Business Case Study Due date:Week 11Group/individual:IndividualWord count/Time provided:2500 to 3000 wordsWeighting:30%Unit Learning Outcomes:ULO1; ULO2; ULO3; ULO4 Assessment 3 DetailContextAs an project manager you will need funding to complete your project/venture. A corporate decisionhas been made that all funding is internal. You may, however, argue that alternate sources may beappropriate (i.e. banks, angel investors, micro-finance organisations, crowd funding, etc.).You will need to present your ideas in a succinct, coherent and persuasive report, to assess the viabilityof your project.This assessment simulates this professional practice, where you present the key analysis to persuadeyour potential key stakeholders to invest in your project in a safe environment.You should consider the following:• Identify the stakeholders you are presenting to in this assessment. In this case assumethat the lecturer is the manager of the company.• Introduce the project idea. Include what the idea is and why it matters to the business.You are free to make any assumptions about the business as needed – provided they arelogical.• Provide details of your financial analysis and assessment of the project viability. Ensurethat you consider the key risks and the results of sensitivity analyses.• Close the deal. Why should the manager approve the project. Be persuasive.Assessments 3 Marking Criteria and RubricThe assessment will be marked out of 100% and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark. Themarking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.Assessment 3 Marking Criteria and Rubric Marking CriteriaNot Satisfactory(0-49% of the criterionmark)Satisfactory(50-64% of the criterionmark)Good(65-74% of the criterionmark)Very Good(75-84% of the criterionmark)Excellent(85-100% of the criterionmark)Evaluation andexplanation of financialviability and funds.40%No/limitedevidence ofevaluation.Explanation resembles arecall or summary of keyideas but not supported byevidence.A basic attempt toevaluate the financialviability and fundsrequired.Explanation resembles arecall or summary of keyideas.An adequate attempt toevaluate the financialviability and fundsrequired.Demonstrates a capacity toexplain and apply relevantconcepts.Clear and accurateevaluation of the financialviability and fundsrequiredWell demonstrated capacityto explain and applyrelevant concepts.Critical and thoroughevaluation of the financialviability and funds required.Mastery of concepts andapplication to newsituations/further learning.Audience (keystakeholders) needs.15%No awareness of audienceneeds.Limited awareness ofaudience needs.Awareness of audienceneeds.Advanced and integratedunderstanding of audienceneeds.Systematic and criticalunderstanding of audienceand their needs.PersuasiveCommunication25%Difficult to understand, nological/clear structure,poor flow of ideas,argument lacks supportingevidence.Cannot follow the line ofreasoning.Information, arguments andevidence are not alwaysclear and logical.Line of reasoning is oftendifficult to follow.Well presented and mostlylogical. Presentationsupported by evidence.Well presented and logical.Well supported by evidence.Presentation is logical,persuasive, and wellsupported by evidence,demonstrating a clear flowof ideas and arguments.Understanding of thepractical application andimplications of keyconcepts and principles20%Uses a limited range ofinformation as the basis ofrecommended practice.Accesses relevantinformation. Adequatelyutilizes information frompeer feedback and a varietyof sources.Understands the viabilityof the business.Correctly utilizesinformation from peerfeedback and a variety ofsources.Understands the businessand its risks.Can prepare andpresents businesscases/proposals.Correctly utilizesinformation from peerfeedback and a variety ofsources.Holistic understanding ofbusiness and its risks.Assesses the impact ofinformation andcommunication systems onthe operations of thebusiness.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS