Computer Organisation and Architecture Assessment | My Assignment Tutor

ICT201: Assessment 2 Compiled by: Ali Noori T1 2021T1 2021: ICT201 Computer Organisation and ArchitectureAssessment 2Assessment type: Report (2,000 words) – individual assignmentPurpose: This assessment will allow students to demonstrate that they can identify and understandsynchronisation and deadlocks. This assessment contributes to Learning Outcomes b and c.Value: 30% (Report 20%; Presentation 10%)Due Date: Report Submission via Moodle (Week 9 Sunday 23:59); Presentation (Week 10 – 11)Submission: Upload the completed report via Moodle.Assessment Topic: Analysis of an Operating System scenario, Computer Organisation andArchitecture ReportTask Details: The report will require analysis of an operating system scenario and a report on thesystems and logical issues involved, as well as options for resolving the problem and subsequentimplications.Referencing: Please remember that all sources used in assessment tasks must be suitablyreferenced.Harvard referencing is the required method. A Referencing Guide, “Harvard Referencing”, and aReferencing Tutorial can be found on the right-hand menu strip in Moodle on all subject pages.Assignment Details:Assess the significance of locality and its applicability across a broad range of memory hierarchies.Write a report and expand on the justifications given in chapter one and chapter eight of the book(Stallings, W. (2017). Operating System: internals and design principles. 9th ed. Essex: PearsonEducation Limited.) for why the locality principle is valid.You should use internet resources and other books as well.Your report should be clearly structured.Prepare a brief presentation of your report, and present it to the rest of the class.You must provide references and cite the resources that you consulted for this assignment.Harvard referencing is the required method.ICT201: Assessment 2 Compiled by: Ali Noori T1 2021Assessment 2 Marking Rubrics – Report: CriteriaUnsatisfactorySatisfactoryEffectiveExcellentExceptional30 %ContentFail(0 – 49%)Pass(50 – 64%)Credit(65 – 74%)Distinction(75 – 84%)High Distinction(85 – 100%)Depth ofContentThe explanationis sufficientlyinaccurate,incomplete, orconfusing thatthe reader gainslittle informationfrom the report. Itappears that littleattempt has beenmade to help thereaderunderstand thematerial.Some difficultyin reading,structurelacking insome partsWell written,structure nottotally clearWell writtenand structured.An accurate andcomplete explanationof key concepts andtheories is made,drawing on relevantliterature. Enoughdetail is presented toallow the reader tounderstand thecontent and makejudgments about it. Inaddition, applicationsof theory areincluded to illuminateissues.Readers gaininsights.6Accuracy ofContentDoes not directlyanswer questionDirectlyanswers mostof the questionDirectlyanswers thequestionDirectlyanswers thequestion givingadditionalinsightsInformation (names,facts, etc.) includedin the report isconsistentlyaccurate.6Clarity ofPurposeNo support forthe project’sobjectives takenin the answer.Provides somesupport for theproject’sobjectivestaken.The project’sobjectives arepresented. Themotivation forpursuing theproject and itsrelevance areaddressed.Thediscussion isreasonablyclear but notcompelling.Providesexcellent levelof support forproject’sobjectivestaken.The project’sobjectives are clearlystated. Themotivation forpursuing the projectand itsrelevance are clearlyandpersuasivelyestablished byrelating the project tocurrent engineeringproblems.6Depth ofAnalysisNo analysispresentedAnalysis basedon someargumentAnalysis basedon soundargumentAnalysis basedon anextensiveargumentResults are carefullyandobjectively analysed.Interpretations aremade usingappropriateequations, models,or theories.6Use ofLanguage:WordChoice,Grammar,andSentenceStructureVery littleknowledge ofsubject matterdemonstrated.Adequateknowledge ofsubject matterdemonstrated.Soundknowledge ofsubject matterdemonstrated.High level ofknowledge ofsubject matterdemonstrated.High level ofknowledge of subjectmatter and synthesiswith theorydemonstrated6

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *