Design Phase | My Assignment Tutor

Assessment item 3 – Design Phase Due Date: 20-May-2021 Length: 2000 words TASK In this phase of the project, you need to perform the following design activities in continuation of the analysis activities from assignment 2. Design the system architecture, describing the important hardware and software components (servers, clients etc.) and their role. Justify your design decisions that involve a choice of technology or choice of software components. It is strongly recommended to draw one or more architecture diagrams to better illustrate your designs.Choose two distinct use cases and draw their user interface mockups in the form of storyboards. You should confirm the principles of good UI design as taught in the subject. Storyboard diagrams should have sufficient details and annotations to give a clear idea of the proposed design.Perform use case realization for two most important use cases from the case study. Choose two important use cases for the system (from assignment 2) and elaborate on them using sequence diagrams. Maximum word count is 2000, excluding the diagrams. RATIONALE This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s: be able to create analysis and design diagrams with UML notation.be able to compare the syntax, semantics and pragmatics of UML to determine the best diagrams for the problem domain.be able to model various aspects of systems to construct quality diagrams for use in a system development project. MARKING CRITERIA AND STANDARDS CriteriaHDDICRPSFLSystem Architecture20 marksDetailed design is proposed containing network components, software components and their interaction.The design takes into account all FRUPS requirements.Justifies choices with sound arguments.Detailed contains information on network components, software components and their interaction, but some parts are ambiguous.The design considers some FRUPS requirements.Justifies choices with sound arguments.Design only explains one of the two: network components and software component interaction.Some justifications are provided but they are not convincing.A rudimentary design is proposed that lacks insight.Little justification is provided for design choices.Does not meet PS criteria.Storyboards20 marksStoryboards demonstrate consideration of four or more UI design principles.Storyboards demonstrate consideration of at most three UI-design principles.Two detailed storyboards are provided.Principles of good UI design ignored in storyboards.Storyboards are brief and lack detail.ORThe storyboard is drawn for a single-use case.Does not meet PS criteria.Sequence Diagrams 30 marksDetailed sequence diagrams include exact messages, parameters, returned data and their sequencing.Diagrams also model loops and conditional branching.Detailed sequence diagrams include exact messages, parameters, returned data and their sequencing.Sequence diagrams are brief but show the logical flow of the system activities and messages using accurate notations.Sequence diagrams lack detail or use many incorrect notations.ORDetailed sequence diagrams are drawn for only one use case.Sequence diagrams are not drawn or use completely wrong UML notationsWriting, Presentation and Referencing10 marksAccurate grammar and spelling. Word limit is maintained.Diagrams are neatly presented and properly labelled.Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA style. All references are cited in the text.Accurate grammar and spelling. Word limit is maintained.Diagrams are neat but not properly labelled..Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA style. Most of the references are cited in the text.Mostly accurate grammar and spelling. Word limit is exceeded or falls short by more than 10%.Diagrams contain tiny harder to read the text.Some attempt at referencing and according to the APA style. Few references are cited in the text.Several grammar and spelling errors. Word limit is exceeded or falls short by more than 20%.Diagrams are messy and poorly organized.The attempt at referencing but not exactly according to APA standard and only a few references are cited in the text.The writing style is not fluent.The report is not well-organised and contains many grammatical and spelling mistakes. Word limit is ignored completely.Hand-drawn diagrams are submitted.Referencing is absent/ unsystematic. PRESENTATION Assignment should be submitted as a single Word document. Diagrams can be created using any UML and general drawing tools. All diagrams need to be included in the report, with a caption and figure number. If needed, use landscape pages for large diagrams. Hand-drawn diagrams will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS Correct referencing is important for your assignment. A guide to the APA style of referencing is available at: http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *