ROYAL DOCKS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND LAW ASSESSMENT GUIDE HR7004 MENTAL WEALTH: PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE AND APPLIED RESEARCH Level 7 Term 2 Academic Year 2020/21 Module Leader: Mr Sujay Sinha Email: [email protected] Tel: 020 8223 6623 Room Number:Online ASSESSMENT TASKS There are three individual assessments for this module that must be submitted as one piece of coursework with the following characteristics: NoAssessment TaskWeightingExtentModalityDeadlineTo submit on:1Professional Learning Badges40%4 coursesIndividual10/5/21Turnitin2Enrichment activities30%Enrichment portfolio (600 words)Individual8/04/21Turnitin3Reflective Account30%1500 wordsindividual10/5/21Turnitin See below the specifications for the above assessments. Assessment 1: Professional Learning Badges (40 %) – SPECIFICATIONS This assessment is based on a learning badge. The learning badge validates the accomplishment of a learning activity through your involvement in lecture, seminar, workshop, conferences or any educational strategy with a focus on online learning at your time of choosing. The badges to be learned and earned are in alignment with engagement, mental wealth competencies and employability parameters. Currently, in the middle of the social, economic and cultural transformations, it is very important for any individual to participate and demonstrate the knowledge, skills and behaviours required for to be aligned with a new mindset, good physical conditions and innovative competences. The Badges would be earned from the AWS educate and LinkedIn Learning platforms. The details would be covered in the assessment guide. The details are following: AWS Educate Cloud Computing will be introduced you to process of cloud computing and its relevance in the new digital economy.Taking Charge of your career is LinkedIn learning course on employability and career orientation.Customer service leadership develop your skills in establishing your career in customer service focused industry.Social media marketing in small business provides an individual to consult SMEs or to do self-marketing of their SMEs using the digital platforms. Marking criteria for the; NoCRITERIAWEIGHTING (%)1AWS Educate on Cloud Computing102Taking Charge of your Career103Customer Service leadership104Social media Marketing for Small Business1040% . Assessment 2: Enrichment Activities – SPECIFICATIONS You must complete all sections of this Enrichment Activity by simply following the instructions on the subsequent pages of this template document. The sections that you will need to complete before your final submission can be checked off one-by-one for your records using this checklist: WeightingComponents of this Enrichment Activity10%Part 1: Engagement with MH In-sessional20%Part 2: Enrichment portfolio The First part of the enrichment activity: The Malvern House in sessional would provide the evidence of your current general MBA skills. Based on the results of the initial diagnostic test you will be informed about the further need to attend in sessional classes to improve your general MBA skills. The marks awarded is based on your submission of diagnostic test and (if recommended) attendance and engagement in the in-sessional classes. Students exempted from further participation with the In sessional classes would be evaluated only on the basis of their Enrichment portfolio wherein they have reflect on all five traits which is second part of the enrichment activity. The Second Part of Enrichment activity: This assessment is based on a multiple test based on big five personality traits. There are five components to this part of the Enrichment Activity: Complete the self-assessment (predicted score)Complete the Cultural Intelligence TestComplete the Big Five Personality Test The Big Personality Traits. You can access the test for free online here: 123Test The Big Five Personality TestComplete the self-assessment table (post-test) Here, input the predicted scores (completed earlier) and actual scores (received after completing the Big Five Personality Test).Write FOUR short reflections. Each reflection should be on ONE trait from the Big Five Personality Test linked to some of the eight Mental Wealth competencies, the learnings as a result of attending this module, completing the Cultural Intelligence test and completing the self-assessments and how it can potentially affect your own employability.Students exempted from further participation with the In sessional classes would be evaluated only on the basis of their Enrichment portfolio wherein they have reflect on all five traits which is second part of the enrichment activity. Marking criteria for the: NoCRITERIAWEIGHTING (%)1Engagement with MH in sessional102Enrichment Portfolio of Reflective writing on Personality Traits2030% Assessment 3: Reflective Account – SPECIFICATIONS The reflective account is an opportunity to evaluate your actions throughout the learning process reflecting on the knowledge, skills and Mental wealth competencies required by professional set up. An example could be the use of the CIPD professions map for HR professionals. You will need to include your: knowledge of the connected digital, social and economic space and your use of ICTrole in creating organizational culture through your researchactions integrating research practices into your professional context Aim of the reflective account: To write a reflective account that describes, interprets and presents the experience gained by the student during the development of the module HR7004 related to your profession and mapping it to your individual personality and relevant mental wealth competencies. Links recommended to write a reflective account: The following links are just references to understand more about the content and format of a reflective account. Feel free to find more information from accredited website or sources that allow you to know and present a good reflective account, always keeping in mind the marking criteria. Reflective writing guide (Clickhere) Marking criteria for the reflective account: Your reflection will be related to your awarding body’s requirements in these areas, will refer to relevant academic sources and theories, and will identify future learning outcomes based on your reflection. The criteria to evaluate in a reflective writer are: (1) Reflection; (2) Evidence/theory; (3) Clarity; and (4) Personal learning outcomes. See below the marking: NoCRITERIAWEIGHTING (%)1Depth and breadth of relevant reflection102Supporting academic evidence103Clear and professional writing054Personal learning outcomes0530% More details about the above criteria have been stated on the below table. Ensure to read detailed this information which will give you a clear landscape of the whole assessment. Format, referencing and use of quotations. Your work should be word processed in accordance with the following: Font size 11, using a sans serif font such as Arial or similar.1.5 line spacingThe page orientation should be ‘portrait’ (large diagrams and tables can be in landscape orientation if that enables them to fit on fewer pages)Margins on both sides of the page should be no less than 2 cm.Pages should be numbered.Your name should not appear on the script.Your student number should be included on every page.Harvard Style referencing shown in Pierce and Shields (2010) Cite Them Right must be followed. ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION We strongly suggest that you try to submit all coursework by the deadline set as meeting deadlines will be expected in employment. However, in our regulations, UEL has permitted students to be able to submit their coursework up to 24 hours after the deadline. The deadline is published in this module guide. Coursework which is submitted late, but within 24 hours of the deadline, will be assessed but subjected to a fixed penalty of 5% of the total marks available (as opposed to marks obtained). If you submit twice, once before the deadline and once during the 24 hour late period, then the second submission will be marked and 5% deducted. If you miss the deadline for a genuine reason, you will need to apply for extenuating circumstances. Further information is available in the Assessment & Feedback Policy at Policies (click on other policies) Use of Turnitin Your assessment should be submitted on Turnitin. If you fail to submit, in accordance with the guidance provided you will be awarded a mark of 0. There are two main reasons we want you to use Turnitin: Turnitin can help you avoid academic breaches and plagiarism. When you use Turnitin before a submission deadline, you can use the Originality Report feature to compare your work to thousands of other sources (like websites, Wikipedia, and even other student papers). Anything in your work that identically matches another source is highlighted for you to see. When you use this feature before the deadline, you will have time to revise your work to avoid an instance of academic breach/plagiarism.Turnitin saves paper. In using Turnitin to electronically submit your leadership assessment, you will not have to submit a paper copy. Late Submissions Using Turnitin UEL allows students to submit their coursework up to 24 hours after the deadline. Assessments that are submitted up to 24 hours late are still marked, but with a 5% deduction. However, you have to be very careful when you are submitting your assessment. If you submit your work twice, once using the original deadline link and then again using the late submission link on Turnitin, your assignment will be graded as late with the 5% deduction. Turnitin System Failure Best advice: Don’t wait until the last minute to submit your assessment electronically. If you experience a problem submitting your work with Turnitin, you should notify your lecturer/tutor by email immediately. However, deadlines are not extended unless there is a significant systems problem with Turnitin. UEL has specific plans in place to address these issues. If UEL finds that the issue with the system was significant, you will receive an email notifying you that you have been given a 24 hour extension. If you don’t receive an email the original deadline will NOT have been extended. Guidance on Referencing Cite them Right is the standard Harvard referencing style at UEL This book will teach you all you need to know about Harvard referencing, plagiarism and collusion. The electronic version of “Cite Them Right: the essential referencing guide” 9th edition, can be accessed whilst on or off campus, via UEL Direct. The book can only be read online and no part of it can be printed nor downloaded. Further information is available at: J. STUDENT FEEDBACK UEL values student feedback and there are lots of channels for gathering your views. Module evaluation is your opportunity to provide feedback on your learning and teaching experience of studying on your modules. All undergraduate and taught postgraduate students are provided with the opportunity to contribute feedback on their experience for each module that they study. Opportunities for student feedback on the module including end of module evaluation. If you consider you have feedback to give that points to something you feel you are needing to assist in your studies, please also discuss it with your module leader or seminar tutor. Do not wait until you are provided with a formal opportunity. FEEDBACK – This aims to answer a few questions you may have about feedback. What is FEEDBACK?Why is FEEDBACK important to students?What forms does FEEDBACK come in?The FEEDBACK Loop What is FEEDBACK? Feedback is crucial for your learning and it is an important part of the academic cycle. It tells you what the strengths are of your work, what its weaknesses are and how it can be improved. Why is FEEDBACK important to students? Its purpose is to help you: understand how questions, essays or problems should be answered. This will help you produce better work for the future. It might suggest alternative sources of assistance such as support available from the Centre for Student Success in order to help you produce work which is better expressed or structured. It may also signpost you to online resources which provide assistance in this area. It might tell you that you need to change the content of your work e.g. in law you do not provide sufficient cases or analysis. In all disciplines within the School you might be told that you need to reference correctly, use more source materials or ensure that you answer the question set. If you pay attention to feedback, particularly where the same comment is made in several modules you can use the information to improve. 3. What forms does FEEDBACK come in? When a tutor comments on your answers in seminars/lectures/workshopsGeneral comment on assesment performance in lectures and seminarsGeneral comment on questions prepared for seminarsWhen another student makes comments on your presentationWhen you produce practice questions for a tutor who gives commentsWhen you receive written comments on your work submitted either as coursework or examWhen you look at general feedback on module performance on UEL Direct.When you see your Academic Adviser with all your assessment feedback for general advice. You should


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *