PUBH6004: Leadership and Effecting Change | My Assignment Tutor

PUBH6004 Assessment Brief 3.2 Page 1 of 4 ASSESSMENT BRIEFSubject Code and TitlePUBH6004: Leadership and Effecting Change in Public HealthAssessmentAssessment 3.2: Group Assessment Reflection – AppliedLeadershipIndividual/GroupIndividualLength1,000 wordsLearning OutcomesThis assessment addresses the following learning outcomes:4. Apply strategies to effectively lead change andfacilitate collaboration and the empowerment ofothers5. Analyse the relationship among leadership, power,ethics, values and different forms of accountability6. Apply strategies for effective change managementwith individuals, teams andorganisationsSubmissionReflection submission due on Sunday (Week 11) by11:55pm AEST/AEDT*Weighting20%Total Marks100 marks *Please Note: This time is Sydney time (AEST or AEDT). Please convert to your own timezone (e.g. Adelaide = 11:25pm).Instructions:Part 3.1 of the assessment required you to apply leadership skills and strategies explored in thesubject as a team and deliver a group presentation (see dedicated brief for instructions).Part 3.2 is an Individual Reflection task (20%).PUBH6004 Assessment Brief 3.2 Page 2 of 4Part 3.2: Reflection task (1000 words, 20%)Part 3.2.1: Self- Assessment: Development of teamwork skillsReflect on your experience of working with the other group members to prepare your presentation.Focus on answering these questions in your own words:• How did you prepare/contribute to the team presentation?• What did you learn about yourself being a member of the team? Briefly discuss how yourcommunication, leadership, and collaboration skills were developed in the team. Provide concreteexamples.Part 3.2.2: Self-Assessment: Leadership StyleReflect on the leadership lessons you have learned from our PUBH6004 class about your personalleadership style or the kind of leader you want to be.• Apply principles covered in class discussions and readings toward the development of yourpersonal leadership style.• Utilise the results from leadership and/or personality assessments to support your reflection.Please choose one from the options below:o How ready are you to assume a leadership role?o Northouse Leadership Skills Inventoryo Implicit Association Testo Gallup Strengthso Bolman Deal Wizard InventoryAssessment Criteria:Your assessment will be assessed against the following criteria:1. Demonstrates learning and growth from self-reflection on experiences, learnings, and leadershippractices using appropriate tool. Shows ability to interpret leadership theories, models and toolswhere applicable. Provides an action plan and a conclusion based on reflection outcome (45%)2. Demonstrates ability to reflect on the process of working with the group focusing oncommunication, collaboration, and leadership skills that were developed (35%)3. General assessment criteria (20%)• Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidencePUBH6004_Assessment Brief 3.2 Page 3 of 4 AssessmentAttributes0-34(Fail 1 – F1)Unacceptable35-49(Fail 2 – F2)Poor50-64(Pass -P)Functional65-74(Credit – CR)Proficient75-84(Distinction – DN)Advanced85-100(High Distinction – HD)ExceptionalGrade Description (GradingEvidence of unsatisfactoryEvidence of satisfactoryEvidence of a good level ofEvidence of a high levelEvidence of an exceptionalScheme)achievement of one or moreachievement of courseunderstanding, knowledgeof achievement of thelevel of achievement ofof the learning objectives oflearning objectives, theand skill development inlearning objectives oflearning objectives acrossthe course, insufficientdevelopment of relevantrelation to the content ofthe coursethe entire content of theunderstanding of the courseskills to a competent level,the course or work of ademonstrated in suchcourse demonstrated incontent and/or unsatisfactoryand adequatesuperior quality on theareas as interpretationsuch areas aslevel of skill development.interpretation and criticalmajority of the learningand critical analysis,analysis, logical argument,analysis skills.objectives of the course.logical argument, and useof methodology, theoriesand frameworkcreativity, originality, and useand use of methodology,theories and frameworkDemonstrates learning and growthfrom self-reflection on experiences,learnings, and leadership practicesusing appropriate tool.Shows ability to interpret leadershiptheories and where applicable.Provides an action plan and aconclusion based on reflectionoutcome (45%)Does not meet minimumstandardDemonstrates noawareness of contextand/or purpose of theassignment.Limited understanding ofrequired concepts andknowledgeKey components of arenot addressed.No use of leadershiptheories and model. Doesnot provide an action plan.Meets minimum standardDemonstrates limitedawareness of contextand/or purpose of theassignmentDemonstrates acapacity to explainand apply relevantconceptsVery Limited ability touse leadership theories,models and tools. Doesnot provide an actionplan.Moves beyond minimumstandardDemonstrates consistentawareness of contextand/or purpose of theassignment.Demonstrates a capacityto explain and applyrelevant concepts.Functional ability to useleadership theories,models and tools.Provides an action plan.Exceeds minimumstandardDemonstrates anadvanced andintegratedunderstanding ofcontext and/or purposeof the assignment. Welldemonstrated capacityto explain and applyrelevant concepts.Demonstrate creativeability to use leadershiptheories, models andtools. Provides an actionplan.Exceeds minimumstandard and exhibits highlevels of independenceConsistentlydemonstrates asystematic and criticalunderstanding of contextand purpose of theassignment. Asophisticatedunderstanding of the fieldor discipline/s.Mastery of concepts andapplication to newsituations/furtherlearning. PUBH6004_Assessment Brief 3.2 Page 3 of 4 Demonstrates ability to reflect onthe process of working with thegroup focusing oncommunication, collaboration,and leadership skills that weredeveloped (35%)Limited synthesis andanalysis.Limitedapplication/recommendations based uponanalysis.Demonstrated analysisand synthesis of newknowledge withapplication.Shows the abilityto interpretrelevantinformation andliterature.Well-developedanalysis andsynthesis withapplication ofrecommendationslinked toanalysis/synthesis.Thoroughlydeveloped andcreative analysisand synthesiswith applicationofrecommendations linked toanalysis/synthesis.Highly sophisticated andcreative analysis, synthesisof new with existingknowledge.Recommendations areclearly justified based onthe analysis/synthesis.Applying knowledge tonew situations/othercases.4General assessment criteria (20%)• Use of academic anddisciplineconventions andsources of evidence(Written according to academicgenre (e.g. introduction,conclusion, and has accuratespelling, grammar, sentence andparagraph construction)Poorly written with errors inspelling, grammar.Demonstrates inconsistentuse of good quality, credibleand relevant researchsources to support anddevelop ideas.There are mistakes in usingthe APA style.Written according toacademic genreDemonstrates consistentuse ofcredible and relevantresearch sources tosupport and developideas, but these are notalways explicit or welldeveloped.There are nomistakes in usingthe APA style..Well-written and adheresto the academic genreDemonstrates consistentuse of high quality, credibleand relevant researchsources to support anddevelop ideas.There are no mistakes inusing the APA style.Very well-written andadheres to the academicgenre.Demonstrates efficientuse of high-quality,credible and relevantresearch sources tosupport and developarguments and positionstatements.There are no mistakes inusing the APA style.Expertly written andadheres to the academicgenre.Demonstrates expert useof high-quality, credibleand relevant researchsources to support anddevelop arguments andposition statements.There are no mistakes inusing the APA style. Demonstrate creativeability to use and applyleadership theories,models and tools.Provides an action plan.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *