QUAL11020 Managing Quality marking guide | My Assignment Tutor

QUAL11020 Managing Quality marking guide CriteriaGrade A1Grade A2Grade A3Grade B1 60-69%Grade B2 50-59%Grade C 40-49%Grade D 30-39%  Research title is clear Research question is formulated to state the problem attempted to be addressed by the work to be undertaken Evidence of original thinking Literature Review is underpinning the question and aims and objectives  Demonstrates an exceptional degree of formulating a research question, stating clear and feasible aims and objectives underpinned by strong literature reviewDemonstrates an excellent degree of formulating a research question, stating clear and feasible aims and objectives underpinned by strong literature reviewDemonstrates a high degree of formulating a research question, stating clear and feasible aims and objectives underpinned by strong literature review.Demonstrates a good degree of formulating a research question, stating clear and feasible aims and objectives underpinned by good level of literature reviewDemonstrates some degree of formulating a research question, stating clear and feasible aims and objectives underpinned by adequate literature reviewLimited evidence of  formulating a research question, stating clear and feasible aims and objectives underpinned by little literature review.Little evidence of capability of formulating a research question, stating clear and feasible aims and objectives underpinned by weak literature review.  Methodology is justified and has a clear structure Analysis and discussion of the findings have a connection to the research question and supported by the body of knowledge and critical thinking        Exceptional degree of methodology development. Analysis of the data has a clear strategy and link to the theory. Critical thinking is evident and bridges findings and literature review and brings new perspectiveExcellent degree of methodology development. Analysis of the data has a clear strategy and link to the theory. Critical thinking is evident and bridges findings and literature review and brings new perspectiveVery good degree of methodology development. Analysis of the data has a clear strategy and link to the theory. Critical thinking is evident and bridges findings and literature review and brings new perspectiveGood degree of methodology development. Analysis of the data has a clear strategy and link to the theory. Critical thinking is evident and bridges findings and literature review and brings new perspectiveSome degree of methodology development. Analysis of the data has quite clear strategy and link to the theory. Critical thinking is evident and bridges findings and literature review and brings some new perspectiveLimited degree of methodology development. Analysis of the data has not a very clear strategy and link to the theory. Critical thinking is limited and bridges few findings and literature review and brings  limited new perspectiveLittle or no critical evidence  of methodology development. Analysis of the data has not a clear strategy and weak link to the theory. Critical thinking is not evident and findings do not bridge to literature review nor bring new perspectiveThe structure of the proposal and justification clear Limitations and further research are mentioned Conclusions have a clear connection to the aims and objectives         References, research and presentation.      Very thorough, with breadth and depth, highly relevant, up to date and consistent. Very clear, well-structured and presented piece of work. Accurate use of grammar, syntax and spelling. Sections fully Integrated.Very thorough, with breadth and depth, highly relevant, up to date and consistent. Very clear, well-structured and presented piece of work. Accurate use of grammar, syntax and spelling. Sections fully Integrated.Thorough, with breadth and depth, relevant, up to date and mainly accurate. Clear, well-organised and clearly presented piece of work. Accurate grammar , syntax and spelling but with minor errors Sections Integrated.There is robust referencing/research but tends to focus on either breadth or depth. Inaccuracies. Structure apparent. Grammar, syntax and spelling mainly accurate. Sections relevant if not integrated.Referencing/research provided, lacks breadth or depth, inaccuracies and inconsistencies. Some attempt at appropriate structure. Grammar, syntax and spelling poor. Lacks full integration.Limited referencing/research with considerable number of errors. Some structure present.   Grammar, syntax and spelling poor. Poor integration of sections.Referencing/ research entirely inaccurate or absent. Very poor structure.   Grammar, syntax and spelling very poor. Very poor relevance and integration of sections.

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *