excellent and comprehensive description | My Assignment Tutor

Demonstrated an understanding of the topic and addressing the topic 1. Description of the health issue and pathophysiology2. Explanation of major concepts based on findings from contemporary literature3. Presentation of a management plan from the literature20 to >17.0 pts HD An excellent and comprehensive description of the health issue, pathophysiology very clearly covered, explanation of major concepts based on current literature were meticulously presented. A management plan was excellently presented. 17 to >14.0 pts D A very good description of the health issue, pathophysiology clearly covered, explanation of major concepts based on current literature were very well presented. A very clear management plan was found. 14 to >11.0 pts C A good description of the health issue, pathophysiology covered, explanation of major concepts based on current literature were well presented. A fair management plan was found. 11 to >10.0 pts P A poor description of the health issue, pathophysiology not well covered, explanation of major concepts based on current literature were not well presented. A poor management plan was found. 10 to >5.0 pts N1 A very poor description of the health issue, pathophysiology not covered, explanation of major concepts based on current literature were poorly presented. A very poor management plan was found. 5 to >0 pts N2 Minimal description of the health issue, pathophysiology not covered, explanation of major concepts based on current literature were not presented. No management plans were found.20 ptsCritical analysis and synthesis supported by relevant and credible literature 1. Critical analysis of the issues2. Evidence of original ideas3. Relevant and credible literature were integrated into the arguments.10 to >8.0 pts HD Excellent evaluation of the management plans presented in the literature. Provided a very clear discussion on how the knowledge will assist in advancing the role of a nurse in work practice, with evidence of original ideas. The student provided and integrated a minimum of 10 references including a minimum of 8 peer-reviewed journals. 8 to >7.0 pts D Very Good evaluation of the management plans presented in the literature. Provided a discussion on how the knowledge will assist in advancing the role of a nurse in work practice, with evidence of original ideas. The student provided and integrated a minimum of 10 references including a minimum of 8 peer-reviewed journals. 7 to >6.0 pts C A good evaluation of the management plans presented in the literature. Provided a brief discussion on how the knowledge will assist in advancing the role of a nurse in work practice. Some evidence of original ideas. Some ideas were expressed at a descriptive level. The student provided and integrated a minimum of 10 references including a minimum of 8 peer-reviewed journals. 6 to >5.0 pts P A fair evaluation of the management plans presented in the literature. Attempts to present a discussion on how the knowledge will assist in advancing the role of a nurse in work practice. Many ideas were expressed at a descriptive level. The student provided and integrated 10/ less than 10 literature. 5 to >2.0 pts N1 Poor evaluation of the management plans presented in the literature. Failed to provide a discussion on how the knowledge will assist in advancing the role of a nurse in work practice. Ideas were expressed at a descriptive level. The student provided 10/ less than 10 references. Failed to integrate literature. 2 to >0 pts N2 No evaluation of the management plans presented in the literature. Failed to provide a discussion on how the knowledge will assist in advancing the role of a nurse in work practice. Ideas were expressed at a descriptive level. The student provided 10/ less than 10 references. Failed to integrate literature.10 ptsSequencing and Structure 1. A logical flow of ideas2. Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation3. An appropriate essay structure5 to >4.0 pts HD A high level of skill was demonstrated in developing the assignment topic in an integrated, logical and coherent presentation with no/ minimal grammar, spelling and punctuation errors; the assignment structure included an introduction, body and conclusion. 4 to >3.0 pts D A high level of skill was demonstrated in developing the assignment topic in an integrated, logical and coherent presentation with no/ minimal grammar, spelling and punctuation errors; the assignment structure included an introduction, body and conclusion. 3 to >2.5 pts C A good level of skill was demonstrated in developing the assignment topic in a logical and coherent presentation with some grammar, spelling and punctuation errors; the assignment structure included an introduction, body and conclusion. 2.5 to >2.0 pts P A reasonable level of skill was demonstrated in developing the assignment topic with multiple grammar, spelling and punctuation errors but the meaning was discernible; the assignment structure included an introduction, body and conclusion. 2 to >1.0 pts N1 A limited skill was demonstrated in developing the assignment topic with substantial grammar, spelling and punctuation errors and the meaning was not discernible; the assignment structure is incomplete. 1 to >0 pts N2 A very limited or no skill was demonstrated in developing the assignment topic with substantial grammar, spelling and punctuation errors and the meaning was not discernible; the assignment has a very poor structure.5 ptsSource and Referencing 1. Accurate APA referencing style2. Relevant and updated literature5 to >4.0 pts HD Proper and extensive referencing. Accurate use of APA referencing style in all instances. Most important and most recent resources were used. 4 to >3.0 pts D Referencing done in a proper manner. APA referencing adhered to acceptable conventions with minimal errors. Important and recent resources were used 3 to >2.5 pts C APA referencing largely in-line with acceptable conventions with some errors. Relevant resources were used. 2.5 to >2.0 pts P APA referencing done in a poor manner and did not always adhere to acceptable conventions with few irrelevant and outdated resources. 2 to >1.0 pts N1 Referencing done in a poor manner and did not adhere to acceptable conventions with some irrelevant and outdated resources. 1 to >0 pts N2 A very poor concept in APA referencing. Substantial errors in APA citation methods. Most of the resources included were irrelevant and outdated.5 ptsTotal Points: 40

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *