HS2031 Human Computer Interaction | My Assignment Tutor

HOLMESINSTITUTEFACULTYOF HIGHEREDUCATIONUNDERGRADUATEPROGRAM Assessment Details and Submission GuidelinesTrimesterT1 2021Unit CodeHS2031Unit TitleHuman Computer Interaction (HCI)Assessment TypeIndividual AssignmentAssessment Title HCI in-depth evaluation for websitesPurpose of the Students will be able to:assessment (withULO Mapping)a.Understand basic concepts and theories relating to Human-Computerinteraction (HCI) and user interfacesb. Demonstrate an understanding and appreciation of user interface design,evaluation and technologiesc.Demonstrate skills in designing and evaluating interactive systems and webbased applicationsWeight15% of the total assessmentsTotal Marks100% scaled to 15%Word limit1000-1500 wordsDue DateWeek 07Submission• All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completedGuidelinesAssignment Cover Page. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body)font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate sectionheadings.• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listedappropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style. Assignment 1 SpecificationThe purpose of the report is to provide a critical evaluation of the nominated websites and to supportyour observations and recommendation convincingly. By performing an in-depth evaluation of thefollowing websites:Website 1: https://www.priceline.com.au/Website 2: https://truelinkswear.com/Upon the completion of the task, you are to provide a formal report documenting your criticalevaluation of the two websites. The report should draw particular attention to the interactive aspectsand user interface design of the website. Support your critique with appropriate HCI design andevaluation principles as described in Chapter text book. 1, 2, and 4 of your textbook (Shneiderman &Plaisant, 2010).REPORT STRUCTURE:1. Introduction – State the purpose and objectives of the report.2. Discussion – Build your arguments into a cohesive thread, presenting your observations andfindings that you have collated from section (1) to (3) from ‘WHAT TO INCLUDE’ section.3. Recommendation – This is the section where you present your recommendations —Item (4)from the ‘What to include’ section.4. Conclusion – Summarise your findings, consolidating and drawing attention to the mainpoints of the report.5. References. (a minimum of 4 references)WHAT TO INCLUDE:1. Provide an overview and description of the nominated websites.2. Identify and elaborate the main features of the websites, drawing on your first impression ofthe websites, accessibility, navigation, homepage, etc. (Refer to lecture slides and textbook)3. Compare and contrast the two websites against the:• HCI design principles (Eight Golden Rules of Interface Design)• Usability principles (5 human factors of usability measures)4. Based on your critique and analysis in items (1) to (3) above, provide arecommendation on how the websites should be improved. Conversely, if furtherimprovement is not required, then provide the reasons why that this is the case.PLEASE NOTE:• Except for item (4) of the above, all assertions relating to user interface designprinciples (e.g. statements like ‘blue text on red background is a poor colourcombination’) must be supported by references or critical observation. You can citeadditional scholarly references other than the textbook. (Note: Do not use Wikipediaas a source of reference).• You can also snapshot the parts you evaluate from the site and show it in your reportfor more clarity evidence. And Figures Tables and or diagrams can be added asneeded.• All assignments must be submitted electronically ONLY, uploaded to Blackboard andSubmission of SafeAssign. Submission deadlines are strictly enforced and a latesubmission incurs penalties.• DO NOT SHARE YOUR ASSIGNMENT WITH OTHER STUDENTS under nocircumstances even after the deadline and after you submitted it in the Blackboard. Ifthere will be any similarity detected by SafeAssign or the marker, it is an academicmisconduct case and BOTH of the students will get ZERO and will be reported to theDean academic.Marking criteria MarkingWeightingcriteriaPresentation (Report structure, Layout, Grammar and spelling, Written style10%and expression)Referencing10%Relevance to HCI principles30%Quality of evaluation30%Recommendations and justification20%TOTAL Weight for this assignment marking: 100 (Total of 100 marks to be100%scaled to 15% of actual marks for this unit) Marking Rubrics GradesExcellentVery GoodGoodSatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryIntroductionDemonstratedDemonstratedDemonstrateDemonstratedDid not/20excellentvery goodd goodsatisfactorydemonstrateability to thinkability to thinkability to thinkability to thinkability to thinkcritically andcritically but didcritically andcritically andcritically and didsourcednot sourcesourceddid not sourcenot sourcereferencereferencereferencereferencereference materialmaterialmaterialmaterialmaterialappropriatelyappropriatelyappropriatelyappropriatelyappropriatelyDiscussionDemonstratedDemonstratedDemonstrateDemonstratedDid not/40excellentexcellentd ability toability to thinkdemonstrateability to thinkability to thinkthink criticallycritically andability to thinkcritically andcritically butand sourceddid not sourcecritically and didsourceddid not sourcereferencereferencenot sourcereferencereferencematerialmaterialreference materialmaterialmaterialappropriatelyappropriatelyappropriatelyappropriatelyappropriatelyRecommendationLogic is clearConsistencyMostlyAdequateArgument is/20and easy tological andconsistentcohesion andconfused andfollow withconvincinglogical andconvictiondisjointedstrongconvincingargumentsConclusionAll elementsComponentsComponentsMostProposal lacks/10are presentpresent withpresent andcomponentsstructure.and very wellgood cohesivemostly wellpresentintegrated.integratedHarvard or IEEEClear stylesClearGenerallySometimesLacks consistencyReference stylewith excellentreferencinggoodclearwith many errors/10source ofstylereferencingreferencingreferences.stylestyle

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *