relevance for your future as a registered nurse | My Assignment Tutor

NURBN 3031 Semester 1 2021Assessment Task 3: Essay Worth 40% DUE DATE (week 10)Wednesday 19th May 2020 at 2359hrsPurpose:This assessment task has relevance for your future as a registered nurse. As a practicing registered nurse, your role will includeleading and managing others effectively in a variety of situations and within your professional scope of practice. Providing leadershipto others during various clinical situations and environments requires a sound understanding of the various theoretical and practicalapproaches to leadership.Description:In this assessment students will be required to write a 2000-word essay (+/- 10 %).Professional Purpose of the EssayThe Australian NSQHS Quality and Safety Standards are inherent in the provision of patient care and you as a registered nurse willbe responsible for ensuring care is given to those standards.The essay question is:Critically analyse and discuss how the registered nurse as team leader uses various leadership styles (minimum 3 styles) to achievequality care. Consider how those leadership styles impact care delegation, teaching and leading others to ensure quality standardsare achieved. Identify and describe the RN Standards of Practice (2016) in relation to each of the following three NSQHS standards;2,3 & 6 as demonstrated through teaching and leading to ensure quality patient care.Time Allocation: Students should allocate approximately 50 hours total to ensure timely and successful completion of this task.Referencing and research:Students are required to access a wide variety of peer reviewed databases, journals and textbooks on nursing leadership,management, and clinical practice to inform their essay. Students may also consider other appropriate resources from scholarlydisciplines such as business, health, psychology, and education literature. Students are required to use American PsychologicalAssociation (APA) 7th edition referencing throughout their essay. Student should have more than 15 relevant peer reviewed andcurrent (last 7 years) reference sources cited throughout the assignment for scoring highly in that section of the marking rubric.Seminal pieces of literature by founding theorists can be used but must be contextualised as such and they are not counted as partof the number of references. Students should refer to the marking rubric/guide on Moodle for further details and requirements whenwriting this essay. The APA guidelines can be found on the following link https://federation.edu.au/library/fedciteFormatting:The essay needs to be planned according to the marking criteria, being well structured, double spaced and written with AustralianEnglish grammar conventions with your computer set on Australian English to enable you to correctly edit your spelling, punctuationand grammar. For help with writing essays please refer to the study help on Moodle and utilise STUDIOSITY, CHECKMATE, ASKand PASS programs which have been provided by the university for all students. Links to these resources can be found underLearning and Study in Moodle or by using the following link:http://federation.edu.au/current-students/learning-and-study/online-help-with/guides-to-your-assessments For any assistance withinformation technology and computers please contact the ITS helpdesk on 03 5327 9999 or email servicedesk@federation.edu.au(Please note** these contacts are for students on all campuses and for flexible online students).Assessment Task Marking Rubric:The marking rubric will be used to assess and grade your essay and will be the method of providing feedback. You will also be givenfeedback within the essay. To ensure integrity, a sample of essays will be graded by the teaching team through a process called‘moderation’. Moderation ensures fairness and quality of assessing and grading student work and provides consistency betweenmultiple markers across the three campuses. Marking Rubric is available on Moodle.The rubric is marked out of 80marks. As this task is worth 40% of your overall grade, half of the result received for this task will be youroverall mark for this task. E.g. if you score 70/80 in the rubric then your marks contributing to 40% of your overall grade for thisassessment will be 35.SubmissionThe essay will need to be submitted via the appropriate Turnitin link on Moodle and uploaded as PDF file document. Do not compressor lock your document. The essay needs to follow the university guidelines in formatting with a cover page, with your name studentnumber, assignment title, course name and code, due date and word count. The font should be in Times Roman size 12 and doublespaced (this is important for the eye/neck safety of academic staff marking and so we can clearly write feedback into your essays).Ensure you submit the essay at least 72 hours prior to due date to allow time for any amendments required according to your Turnitinscore and so you can resubmit by the due date and time.The university views plagiarism seriously and current Australian Copyright laws legislate against the intentional copying or use ofanother author’s work without due citation (which is in line with university policy which may lead to exclusion from your degree). It isyour professional responsibility to ensure correct referencing according to APA standards and to ensure you have paraphrased welland written your essay accordingly.Due Date: Wednesday 19th May 2021 @ 2359hrs.Return of work and feedbackThe essays will be marked in line with staffing workloads and university policies and will be returned to students as soon as a practical(generally within 3-4 weeks of submission dates). An announcement will be made on Moodle when the grades are released for thecollective cohorts. Feedback will be provided in the essay structure as well as through the marking rubric, so it is important that studentsview feedback to help you improve and develop your writing capabilities. Graduate AttributesCriteriaHD (80-100)D (70-79)C (60-69)P (50-59)F (0-49)GA1 ThinkersGA4 CommunicatorsGA5 LeadersStructure of EssayPresents the essaysuccinctly usingintroduction, body,conclusion.Essay structure andarguments are logicallyorganised.Correct spelling,grammar, punctuation.Appropriate use ofdiscipline specificacademic language.Double spaced andcorrect font essaysubmission.(10 marks)There is a clear logicalstructure that is easy to followand understand. Formalacademic writing style isapplied with no grammatical,spelling, typographical orformatting errors.(8-10 marks)There is a clear logicalstructure that is easy to followand understand. Formalacademic writing style isapplied with very fewgrammatical, spelling,typographical errors orformatting errors.(7 marks)The structure is generallylogical and easy to follow,though some paragraphs maybe unclear. Occasional partsof the text could be moreclearly expressed, or with amore formal tone. There areminimal grammatical, spellingerrors, typographical andformatting errors.(6 marks)The structure is generallylogical and easy to follow,though some paragraphs maybe unclear. Occasional partsof the text could be moreclearly expressed, or with amore formal tone. There aresome grammatical andspelling errors, typographicaland formatting errors.(5 marks)The structure is difficultto follow. There arenumerous grammatical,spelling, typographicalerrors and formattingerrors. The tone isinformal and notacademic. (0-4 marks)GA1 ThinkersGA2 InnovatorsGA3 CitizensGA4 CommunicatorsGA5 LeadersContent knowledgeIdentifies & rationalises atleast 3 leadership styles.Identifies RN responsibilitiesin provision of quality careand in leading others toensure standards are met.(20 marks)There is evidence of a veryhigh level of understandingabout the topic. The studentis able to comprehensivelyidentify characteristics andbehaviours used by nurses inleading others. Concepts of 3nursing leadership theories,are articulated well.(16-20 marks)There is evidence of a highlevel understanding of theessay topic. The student isable to proficiently identifycharacteristics andbehaviours used by nurses inleading other. Concepts of 3nursing leadership theories,are articulated mostly. (14-15marks)There is evidence of a goodlevel understanding of theessay topic. The student isable to mostly identifycharacteristics andbehaviours used by nurses inleading other. Concepts of 3nursing leadership theoriesare articulated somewhat.(12-13 marks)There is evidence of a basiclevel understanding of theessay topic. The student isable to identify somecharacteristics andbehaviours used by nurses inleading others. Concepts of 2leadership theories arepartially articulated but thereare problems with clarity forthe third theory.(10-11 marks)There is low or noevidence of understandingof the essay topic. Thereis limited or noidentification ofcharacteristics andbehaviours used bynurses in leading others.Concepts of leadershipare poorly articulated. (0-9marks)GA1 ThinkersGA3 CitizensGA4 CommunicatorsGA5 LeadersExamples of RN PracticeRN standards of practiceare applied to the NSQHSstandards (2,3 and 6)related to teaching andleading in the clinicalcontext.(10 marks)There are detailed and indepth examples of RNstandards of practice appliedto all three NSQHSstandards, related toteaching and leading in theclinical context.(8-10 marks)There are very clear examplesof RN standards of practiceapplied to all three NSQHSstandards, related to teachingand leading in the clinicalcontext(7 marks)There are clear examples ofRN standards of practiceapplied to two of the NSQHSstandards, related to teachingand leading in the clinicalcontext(6 marks)There is a satisfactoryapplication of RN standardsof practice applied to one ofthe NSQHS standardsrelated to teaching andleading in the clinical context(5 marks)No or poor examplesof RN standards ofpractice, applied toNSQHS standards relatedto teaching and leading inthe clinical context(0-4 marks) GA1 ThinkersGA4 CommunicatorsGA5 LeadersDiscussion & AnalysisDiscussion and analysis ofthe nurse as teacher andleader in the clinicalcontext. Articulates howthe nurse assesses scopeof practice and delegatescare to others.(15 marks)There is detailedand in-depth discussion ofthe nurse as teacher andleader in the clinical context(13-15 marks)There is detailed discussionof the nurse as teacher andleader in the clinical context.(10-12 marks)There is some detaileddiscussion of the nurse asteacher and leader in theclinical context.(7-9 marks)There is some discussion ofthe nurse as teacher andleader in the clinical context.There are some problemswith clarity.(4-6 marks)Limited to nodiscussion of thenurse as teacherand leader in theclinical context. It isunclear and difficultto understandassertions.(0-3 marks)GA1 ThinkersGA2 InnovatorsGA3 CitizensGA4 CommunicatorsGA5 LeadersCritique and Analysis ofliteratureStrengths andweaknesses of eachleadership style isapplied to NSQHSstandards.Knowledge gained issynthesised, analysed, andapplied in a cohesivemanner which aids thereader’s understanding.Academic integritymaintained.(10 marks)• Insightful analysis ofinformation• Evaluation of evidenceclearly expressed• Literature is succinctlypresented and well critiqued• Excellent ability toparaphrase ideas(8-10 marks)• Reasonable attempt atanalysis of information• Reasonable attempt atevaluation of evidence• Literature is wellcritiqued• Good use of paraphrasing(7 marks)• Some attempt atanalysis• Some attempt atevaluation• Some critique of evidence• Reasonable ability toparaphrase ideas(6 marks)• Analysis of informationrarely present• Evaluation of evidencerarely present• Random or excessive use ofquotations• Minimal critique ofevidence• Paraphrasing skills requiredevelopment to avoid plagiarism(5 marks)• Analysis ofinformation not present• Evaluation ofevidence not expressed• Excessiveuse ofquotations• No critique of evidence• Plagiarism evident(0-4 marks)GA1 ThinkersGA4 CommunicatorsGA5 LeadersResearching skillsSelection of at least 15relevant and current peerreviewed sources (thesesources must not beolder than 7 years).Seminal sources citedfor theoreticalapplication if required.(5 Marks)Evidence of more than 15appropriate and relevant peerreviewed sources fromacademicdatabases.(5 Marks)Evidence of 14-15appropriate and relevant peerreviewed sources fromacademic databases.One or two articles are notgood sources or relevant.(4 Marks)Evidence of 12-13appropriate and relevantpeer reviewed sources fromacademic databases. Twoto three articles are notgood sources or veryrelevant.(3 marks)Evidence of 10-12appropriate and relevantpeer reviewed sources fromacademic databases. Threeto five sources are notrelevant or appropriate.(2 marks)There are 10 orless than 10sources cited whichhave not beensourced. Most arenot fromappropriate andrelevant peerreviewed sourcesor from academicdatabases.(1 Mark)GA4 CommunicatorsGA5 LeadersAPA 7th EditionReferencingIn text referencing is correct,author & year cited, sourcepage/paragraph numbers andinverted comas used fordirect quotes.Reference list correctly cited& formatted & alphabeticallylisted. Spelling, grammarconvention and punctuationadhered to. (10 Marks)Correct APA (7th Ed) style intext and reference list citationsare fully present no mistakes.Minor to no formatting errors.(8-10 marks)In-text and reference listcitations are included andformatted consistently usingAPA (7th Ed) referencingstyle with only one or twominor errors present.Minor errors to no formattingerrors.(7 marks)In-text and reference listcitations are included andformatted mostlyconsistently using APA (7thEd) referencing style fewerthan five minor errorspresent.Minor to no more than 3formatting errors present.(6 marks)In-text and reference listcitations are included andformatted but inconsistentuse of APA (7th Ed)referencing style fewer than7 errors present.No more than 4 formattingerrors present.(5 marks)In-text citations orreference listinformation areinsufficient to allowthe reader to locatethe original articles.Little attempt hasbeen made to useAPA (7th Ed)referencing stylemore than 7 errorspresent. More than 5formatting errorspresent.(0-4 marks)

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *