Research | My Assignment Tutor

2101GIR The Politics of Sustainability Tri 1, 2021 Essay Rubric CriteriaExcellentVery GoodGoodSatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryResearch20%Utilises current, appropriate, credibleand very well chosen sources whichstrongly support the student’sargumentUtilises current, appropriate, credibleand well chosen sources whicheffectively support the student’sargumentUtilises a good number of current, appropriate,credible and well chosen sources which generallysupport the student’s argumentUtilises some current, appropriate,credible and well chosen sourceswhich provide some support to thestudent’s argumentUtilises very few current, appropriate, credibleand well chosen sources; offering little, if any,support to the student’s argumentAcademic writingand referencing20%Quality of writing is of a very highstandard. A clear and well structuredintroduction provides clear guidance tothe essay’s argument; paragraphs arewell linked and cohesive; and there isa clear and concise conclusion. Correctgrammar, spelling and punctuationthroughout. Referencing and referencelist is accurate and complete.Quality of writing is of a highstandard A generally clear and wellstructured introduction providesclear guidance to the essay’sargument; paragraphs are mostlywell linked and cohesive; and thereis a clear and concise conclusion.Mostly correct grammar, spellingand punctuation throughout.Referencing and reference list ismostly accurate and complete.Quality of writing is of a good standard. A solid andmostly well structured introduction provides someguidance to the essay’s argument; paragraphs aremostly well linked and cohesive; and there is a solidand concise conclusion. Mostly correct grammar,spelling and punctuation but with some errors.Referencing and reference list is generally accurateand complete, but with some errors.Quality of writing could beimproved; there are problems withsentence structure andpresentation. An introduction isincluded but does not necessarilycover an introduction’srequirements; there are often weaklinks from one paragraph to thenext, and the conclusion is limited.Frequent grammar, punctuationand spelling mistakes. Referencingand reference list is not alwaysaccurate and complete, and thereare frequent errors.Quality of writing is of a very poor standard,often hard to follow. Only a very limitedintroduction is included; paragraphs are notlinked together cohesively or are poorlystructured; and the conclusion is poorlyconstructed. There are many spelling mistakes.Little or no evidence of proof reading.Referencing and reference list is not accurateand complete, and there are many errors.Organisation20%The ideas are arranged in a verylogical, well-structured, and coherentmanner. Transition or linkingstatements are clearly used as guidesfrom one section to the next.The ideas are arranged in a generallylogical, well-structured, and coherentmanner. Transition or linkingstatements are generally used asguides from one section to the next.The ideas are often arranged in logical, wellstructured & coherent manner. Transition or linkingstatements are used at times as guides from onesection to the next; however could be refined.The ideas are not always logicallystructured or coherently presented.Transition or linking statementscould have been better used asguides from one section to thenext.There is little coherent structure to the essay.The essay appears very confusing, providinglittle rationale with limited use of transition orlinking statements.Argument &Analysis40%The argument is very clearly presentedand defended throughout.Demonstrates a sophisticated anddetailed knowledge of core concepts,and provides a very high level ofanalysis throughout. Student providessignificant insight into the topic area.The argument is, on the whole,clearly presented and defendedthroughout. Demonstrates a verygood knowledge of core conceptsand provides a high level of analysisthroughout. Student provides verygood insight into the topic area.The argument is, generally, clearly presented anddefended throughout. Demonstrates a good level ofknowledge of core concepts and provides a goodlevel of analysis. A commendable effort to provideinsight into the topic area.The argument could have beenbetter developed, presented anddefended. Limited knowledge ofcore concepts demonstrated and alimited level of analysis isprovided. Few insights into thetopic area are provided.The argument is hard to discern as it is verypoorly presented and defended. Very littleknowledge of core concepts is demonstrated andanalysis is extremely limited. Student providesno insight into the topic area.

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *