7020MAA Individual Project | My Assignment Tutor

This document is for Coventry University students for their own use in completing theirassessed work for this module and should not be passed to third parties or posted on anywebsite. Any infringements of this rule should be reported [email protected] of Engineering, Environment and Computing7020MAA Individual ProjectAssignment Brief APPLIED CORE (SUMATIVE ASSESSMENT) Module TitleIndividual ProjectIndividualCohortMaySepModule Code7020MAACoursework Title (e.g. CWK1)Individual Project (Cw2)Hand out date:21/05/2021LecturerOwen RichardsDue date and time:Moodle: 13/08/2021 at18:00:00Estimated Time (hrs):Word Limit*: 12,000 -15,000 wordsCoursework type:Individual% of Module Mark100Submission arrangement online via CUMoodle: Turnitin submissssionFile types and method of recording: word documentMark and Feedback date (DD/MM/YY): 27/05/2021Mark and Feedback method (e.g. in lecture, written via Gradebook): Gradebook Module Learning Outcomes Assessed:1. Develop solutions to given problems by the application of appropriate tools and techniques,within a chosen specialism, with professionalism, confidence and competence.2. Identify, select and review current information resources relevant to a particular problem andjustify appropriate problem solving strategies with respect to resources, tools and techniques.3. Communicate effectively in formal and informal situations both verbally and otherwise withinterested parties.4. Develop project management skills and critically evaluate research and problem solvingprocesses.5. Take account of any legal, social and ethical issues relating to research and project work.Task and Mark distribution:You will need to agree a suitable subject for a research project with your supervisor.Please discuss suitable topics with your mentor and the research methods lecturers and submit aproject title as part of your research methods module. This document is for Coventry University students for their own use in completing theirassessed work for this module and should not be passed to third parties or posted on anywebsite. Any infringements of this rule should be reported [email protected] Module Grading TemplateAll projects should be marked by the First Supervisor and Second Supervisor/Assessorindependently and in line with the relevant marking scheme. The marks and comments forthe students work must be captured in two individual forms. A discussion between the firstmarker and second supervisor should lead to a final agreed mark for the student. Please seethe Faculty Assessment Policy on resolving disputes in marksThe Final Project Grading and Feedback Template should be completed by the first supervisorfollowing the discussion and agreement of result with the 2nd marker and uploaded to Moodlewithin two weeks of submission of the report through Moodle.For this submission, the final report will be submitted by the Due date and time.The supervisor will also check that the ethics process has been completed by the student anda certificate of ethics completion has been issued and this certificate and ethics check list hasbeen included in the appendices of the finally submitted report.If the first and second marker cannot agree where the marks variation is 10% or greater, theyshould refer it to the ML who will assign an independent third marker (who will use the samemarking template). The final mark for the project should then be the average of all three marksfor that piece of work.Once complete this form should be made available through the Moodle site for the studentto access once results are made available by the module leader.Note: The final result for the student must consider the ethics approval, without which thestudent cannot be passed for the project.This document is for Coventry University students for their own use in completing theirassessed work for this module and should not be passed to third parties or posted on anywebsite. Any infringements of this rule should be reported [email protected] Project Module Grading TemplateGuidance: Feedback. Please comment on:Project Report Grading and Feedback Student name:Student ID:Module Code:Supervisor /SecondSupervisor:(delete as applicable)Component Grades Deliverable 1:X/5CONTEXT, SCOPE and degree of RELEVANCE (to programme of study)Appropriateness of project to programme study undertaken and the soundnessof proposal, Scope and level of challenge to objectives and questions the projectattempts to answer.XMarker to provide detailed comments in relation to deliverable one to justify the mark that has beenprovided but also what more the student could have done for a higher mark in this area.Deliverable 2X/10RESEARCH METHODSThe Range and the degree of relevance of the research methods employed (primaryand secondary, qualitative and quantitative) to the project at hand.XMarker to provide detailed comments in relation to deliverable two to justify the mark that has beenprovided but also what more the student could have done for a higher mark in this area.Deliverable 3X/20LITERATURE REVIEW-Comprehensive/ diversity of sources and materials used-The range, relevance of sourcing correctly cited.-Appropriate summaries of articles and level of critical appraisal of literature-Key concepts and disciplines discussedXMarker to provide detailed comments in relation to deliverable three to justify the mark that has beenprovided but also what more the student could have done for a higher mark in this area.Deliverable 4X/20DATA COLLECTION, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSIONClear, rigorous identification of approach.The application and use of appropriate tools, techniques, methodologies,approaches etc.Analysis of findings,Extrapolation of facts and/or statistics,Key observations and impact identified with relevance to subject at hand,Presentation of information in a clear and comprehensive manner.XMarker to provide detailed comments in relation to deliverable four to justify the mark that has beenprovided but also what more the student could have done for a higher mark in this area.Deliverable 5X/20 This document is for Coventry University students for their own use in completing theirassessed work for this module and should not be passed to third parties or posted on anywebsite. Any infringements of this rule should be reported [email protected] SOLUTION, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONSThe degree of ingenuity and originality in the formulation of a solution andconclusions thereof.Summarized critical evaluation of subject area ,Recommendations for identifiable problem area, with consideration to short tomedium term resolutions’Recommendations for the long term futureDepth of thought, consideration, with a buildup rationale supported by theproject approachXMarker to provide detailed comments in relation to deliverable three to justify the mark that has beenprovided but also what more the student could have done for a higher mark in this area.Deliverable 6X/10PM, QA AND CRITICAL EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE ANDCONDUCTCritical evaluation of project conduct, appropriateness of methods employedwith lessons learnt and effectiveness of the experience,PM and quality assurance of conduct of project,Utilisation of appropriate project management practices including Risk Analysis,work breakdown and gantt charts.XMarker to provide detailed comments in relation to deliverable three to justify the mark that has beenprovided but also what more the student could have done for a higher mark in this area.Deliverable 7X/10REPORT STRUCTURE AND COHESIVENESSReport structure and writing: Flow, professionalism, comprehension,completeness and presentation of report, utilisation and reference to appropriatediagrams, charts, figures etc,XMarker to provide detailed comments in relation to deliverable three to justify the mark that has beenprovided but also what more the student could have done for a higher mark in this area.Deliverable 8X/5OVERALL MEETING OF OBJECTIVESDegree of meeting of objectives, breadth and depth of work achievedXMarker to provide detailed comments in relation to deliverable three to justify the mark that has beenprovided but also what more the student could have done for a higher mark in this area.TotalX/100 This document is for Coventry University students for their own use in completing theirassessed work for this module and should not be passed to third parties or posted on anywebsite. Any infringements of this rule should be reported [email protected] Notes:1. You are expected to use the Coventry University APA style for referencing. For support andadvice on this students can contact Centre for Academic Writing (CAW).2. Please notify your registry course support team and module leader for disability support.3. Any student requiring an extension or deferral should follow the university process as outlinedhere.4. The University cannot take responsibility for any coursework lost or corrupted on disks, laptopsor personal computer. Students should therefore regularly back-up any work and are advised tosave it on the University system.5. If there are technical or performance issues that prevent submitting coursework through theonline coursework submission system on the day of a coursework deadline, an appropriateextension to the coursework submission deadline will be agreed. This extension will normally be24 hours or the next working day if the deadline falls on a Friday or over the weekend period.This will be communicated via your Module Leader.6. Assignments that are more than 10% over the word limit will result in a deduction of 10% of themark i.e. a mark of 60% will lead to a reduction of 6% to 54%. The word limit includesquotations, but excludes the bibliography, reference list and tables.7. You are encouraged to check the originality of your work by using the draft Turnitin links onAula/Moodle.8. Collusion between students (where sections of your work are similar to the work submitted byother students in this or previous module cohorts) is taken extremely seriously and will bereported to the academic conduct panel. This applies to both courseworks and exam answers.9. A marked difference between your writing style, knowledge and skill level demonstrated in classdiscussion, any test conditions and that demonstrated in a coursework assignment may result inyou having to undertake a Viva Voce in order to prove the coursework assignment is entirely yourown work.10. If you make use of the services of a proof reader in your work you must keep your originalversion and make it available as a demonstration of your written efforts. Also, please read theuniversity Proof Reading Policy.11. You must not submit work for assessment that you have already submitted (partially or in full),either for your current course or for another qualification of this university, with the exception ofresits, where for the coursework, you maybe asked to rework and improve a previous attempt.This requirement will be specifically detailed in your assignment brief or specific course or moduleinformation. Where earlier work by you is citable, i.e. it has already been published/submitted,you must reference it clearly. Identical pieces of work submitted concurrently may also beconsidered to be self-plagiarism. For guidance, the following table indicates applicable marking guidelines.This document is for Coventry University students for their own use in completing theirassessed work for this module and should not be passed to third parties or posted on anywebsite. Any infringements of this rule should be reported [email protected] RubricPG MarkbandOutcomeGuidelines90-100%DistinctionMeetslearningoutcomesDistinction – Exceptional work with very high degree of rigour,creativity and critical/analytic skills. Mastery of knowledge andsubject-specific theories with originality and autonomy.Demonstrates exceptional ability to analyse and applyconcepts within the complexities and uncertainties of thesubject/discipline.Innovative research with exceptional ability in the utilisation ofresearch methodologies. Demonstrates, creativity, originalityand outstanding problem-solving skills. Work completed withvery high degree of accuracy, proficiency and autonomy.Exceptional communication and expression demonstratedthroughout. Student evidences the full range of technicaland/or artistic skills. Work pushes the boundaries of thediscipline and may be strongly considered for externalpublication/dissemination/presentation.80-89%DistinctionDistinction – Outstanding work with high degree of rigour,creativity and critical/analytic skills. Near mastery ofknowledge and subject-specific theories with originality andautonomy. Demonstrates outstanding ability to analyse andapply concepts within the complexities and uncertainties ofthe subject/discipline.Innovative research with outstanding ability in the utilisation ofresearch methodologies. Work consistently demonstratescreativity, originality and outstanding problem-solving skills.Work completed with high degree of accuracy, proficiency andautonomy. Outstanding communication and expressiondemonstrated throughout. Student demonstrates a very widerange of technical and/or artistic skills. With someamendments, the work may be considered for externalpublication/dissemination/presentation70-79%DistinctionDistinction – Excellent work undertaken with rigour, creativityand critical/analytic skills. Excellent degree of knowledge andsubject-specific theories with originality and autonomydemonstrated. The work exhibits excellent ability to analyseand apply concepts within the complexities and uncertaintiesof the subject/discipline.Innovative research with excellent ability in the utilisation ofresearch methodologies. Work demonstrates creativity,originality and excellent problem-solving skills. Workcompleted with very consistent levels of accuracy, proficiencyand autonomy. Excellent communication and expressiondemonstrated throughout. Student demonstrates a very widerange of technical and/or artistic skills.60-69%Merit – Very good work often undertaken with rigour,creativity and critical/analytic skills. Very good degree of This document is for Coventry University students for their own use in completing theirassessed work for this module and should not be passed to third parties or posted on anywebsite. Any infringements of this rule should be reported [email protected] Meritknowledge and subject-specific theories with some originalityand autonomy demonstrated. The work often exhibits theability to fully analyse and apply concepts within thecomplexities and uncertainties of the subject/discipline.Very good research evidence and shows very good ability inthe utilisation of research methodologies. Work demonstratescreativity, originality and problem-solving skills. Workcompleted with very consistent levels of accuracy, proficiencyand autonomy. Very good communication and expressiondemonstrated throughout. Student demonstrates a wide rangeof technical and/or artistic skills.50-59%PassPass – Good work undertaken with some creativity andcritical/analytic skills. Demonstrates knowledge and subjectspecific theories with some originality and autonomydemonstrated. The work exhibits the ability to analyse andapply concepts within the complexities and uncertainties ofthe subject/discipline.Good research and shows some ability in the utilisation ofresearch methodologies. Work demonstrates problem-solvingskills and is completed with some level of accuracy, proficiencyand autonomy. Satisfactory communication and expressiondemonstrated throughout. Student demonstrates some of thetechnical and/or artistic skills.40-49%PassPass – Assessment demonstrates some advanced knowledgeand understanding of the subject informed by current practice,scholarship and research. Work may be incomplete with someirrelevant material present. Sometimes demonstrates theability to analyse and apply concepts within the complexitiesand uncertainties of the subject/discipline.Acceptable research with evidence of basic ability in theutilisation of research methodologies. Demonstrates someoriginality, creativity and problem-solving skills but often withinconsistencies. Expression and presentation sufficient foraccuracy and proficiency. Sufficient communication andexpression with professional skill set. Student demonstratessome technical and/or artistic skills.30-39%FailFails toachievelearningoutcomesFail – Very limited understanding of relevant theories, conceptsand issues with deficiencies in rigour and analysis. Somerelevant material may be present but be informed from verylimited sources. Fundamental errors and somemisunderstanding likely to be present. Demonstrates limitedability to analyse and apply concepts within the complexitiesand uncertainties of the subject/discipline.Limited research scope and ability in the utilisation of researchmethodologies. Limited originality, creativity, and struggleswith problem-solving skills. Expression and presentationinsufficient for accuracy and proficiency. Insufficientcommunication and expression and with deficiencies inprofessional skill set. Student demonstrates deficiencies in therange of technical and/or artistic skills. This document is for Coventry University students for their own use in completing theirassessed work for this module and should not be passed to third parties or posted on anywebsite. Any infringements of this rule should be reported [email protected] 20-29%Fail –Fail – Clear failure demonstrating little understanding ofrelevant theories, concepts, issues and only a vague knowledgeof the area. Little relevant material may be present andinformed from very limited sources. Serious and fundamentalerrors and virtually no evidence of relevant research.Fundamental errors and misunderstandings likely to bepresent.Little or no research with no evidence of utilisation of researchmethodologies. No originality, creativity, and struggles withproblem-solving skills. Expression and presentation insufficientfor accuracy and proficiency. Insufficient communication andexpression and with serious deficiencies in professional skillset. Student has clear deficiencies in range of technical and/orartistic skills.0-19%FailFail – Clear failure demonstrating no understanding of relevanttheories, concepts, issues and no understanding of area. Littleor no relevant material may be present and informed fromminimal sources. No evidence of ability in the utilisation ofresearch methodologies. No evidence of originality, creativity,and problem-solving skills. Expression and presentationdeficient for accuracy and proficiency. Insufficientcommunication and expression and with deficiencies inprofessional skill set. Student has clear deficiencies in range oftechnical and/or artistic skills. This document is for Coventry University students for their own use in completing theirassessed work for this module and should not be passed to third parties or posted on anywebsite. Any infringements of this rule should be reported [email protected] Referral FeedbackThe work that you have presented has been judged by the examiners to be insufficient to pass the project module andhas therefore been referred to a later meeting of the assessment board. This form is to inform you of what you mustdo, to the satisfaction of the examiners, in order to gain a pass. Reason for FailureWork required to rectify failure

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *