Assessment 2: Request for Proposal | My Assignment Tutor

1Assessment 2: Request for ProposalOverviewIn this work integrated learning assessment, you will create a response to a request for proposal (RFP) for thesimulated business environment introduced in Week 1 of the course. Crafting a successful response to an RFP is anecessary first step to working in consulting and securing funding for consulting services. Your response willinclude a report that details your proposed plan for addressing the problem along with a supporting 3-minutevideo presentation that pitches your plan to the company. To develop your response, you will be required toworkshop the problem in teams and include a reflection on how the team experience influenced your proposal.This assessment will assist you to practice the skills required to develop an informed and persuasive business casethat• identifies and discusses the problem as you see it based on your industry knowledge and understandingof problem types, and• presents an approach to solving the problem using your understanding of consulting tools andmethodologies.To be successful your report and presentation should present a convincing argument that you understand abusiness’ context and problem and can execute an effective and efficient solution to deliver value to the business.Assessment criteriaThis assessment will measure your ability to:• Apply design thinking to elaborate on your understanding of the problem within the context of theindustry. (8%)• Devise a compelling response to the requirements of the RFP. (8%) Assessment type:Report and video presentationWordlimit:Max: 2000words (+/–10%) + 3-minute videopitchDue date:Weighting Consulting2• Articulate a clear and logical solution that addresses ethics and sustainability and adds value to thebusiness. (8%)• Apply and reflect on interpersonal skills that can be used to work in teams. (3%)• Model clear and concise written and verbal skills within required presentation context as well asappropriate supporting evidence whether verbal information reference or written reference supports.(3%)Course learning outcomesThis assessment is relevant to the following course learning outcomes:• CLO1: Apply design thinking to national and international business problems and opportunities, so as todevelop solutions for defined end-users.• CLO2: Apply interpersonal skills to work in teams and to communicate effectively with clients.• CLO3 Create solutions and recommendations that add value to the client’s organisation throughresponding to a client project brief in an ethical sustainable manner.3Assessment detailsYou are a manager in a consulting firm, who is expected to provide a response to this RFP to winthe business in the simulated business environment of this work integrated learning assessment.Your response, delivered as a written report and video pitch, should answer the following questions:• What do you think the key aspects of the problem are?• What other factors should be considered to effectively solve the problem?• What will you deliver? What are your goals?• What will be your approach to meet those goals?• What is the methodology you will use to investigate, analyse and solve the problem?• What additional resources or information do you require from the organisation toeffectively deliver?• What is your plan to be able to deliver as per the timelines? What resources are you proposing,and how will you schedule the deliverables?• How will you address ethics and sustainability in your work?You will be allocated into consulting team squads to workshop and develop your response. There aresquad specific tasks integrated into the course to assist, however you are free to manage how you meetand what aspects of the topic you workshop or collaborate on. While this is not a team task, working in ateam is a vital component of consulting and you will be required to provide a brief reflection on the rolethat teamwork played in the development of your ideas and pitch. The squad could be used to interrogatethe problem and possible solutions, and also to work together to explore and test the best ways topersuade and win over others with your pitch.Response to the request for proposalYour response should include the following sections:• Introduction:o A brief statement of what makes you a good consultant, and why you are interested in andsuitable for the work. You should also include a brief CV/Resume as an Appendix tosupport your RFP as the lead consultant highlighting your qualifications and capabilities.o Build on your self-reflection from assessment 1 to create this section.• The problem:o Outline of your view on what the problem is with evidence that supports your view fromyour research on the industry context. Apply Design Thinking and other tools to firmlydefine the consulting problem.o Include a discussion of additional factors that you think should be considered toeffectively solve the problem.4o Indicate assumptions, constraints and any limitations bounding your analysedsolution response and action plan.• Development considerations:o Identify key organisational resources, key decision flows and alignment of key stakeholdersrequired to develop your deliverables considerations.• Deliverables and approach:o Outline each deliverable with specific detail around approach and methodology usedto produce that deliverable.o You should also cover additional resources or information you need from the organisationto deliver.• Delivery plan:o What are the specific solution recommendations? Identify what is involved.o How will you achieve your deliverable goals? What are the timelines for criticalimplementation? Provide a high-level schedule.o What team roles and skills do you recommend to deliver the project? Who will be requiredinside the organisation and outside as a resource to ensure implementation, monitoringand evaluation of preferred solution actions?o A general indication of costs associated with implementation in line with the brief.o How will you integrate ethical and sustainable principles to the work anddeliverables?• Summary:o Final summary of your recommendations which aims to persuade and win the pitch.• Reflection on group work:o A short reflection on how working with a team to explore the problem and possiblesolutions influenced your response.It is expected that you integrate evidence from various sources to support your analysis of theindustry context, your choice of methodology and your recommendations on sustainability and ethics.Video pitch requirementsYour 3 minute video presentation presents the key aspects of your response to the client with the aimof persuading the client that you understand and can solve the problem. The vodcast must include thefollowing:• Your presentation (2-5 slides)• your narration (audio)Your video presentation must be made into a video file and submitted via Canvas Studio. You can usePowerPoint to create your slides, but they then must be converted to video. Raw PowerPoint slides arenot permitted.We recommend using Canvas Studio to record your video presentation, but you may use the tool of yourchoice and then upload the video file to Canvas Studio for submission.Instructions for using Canvas Studio can be found on the Canvas page for this assessment.7 CriteriaRatingsPtsHDDCPNCriterion 1Elaborate on your understandingof the problem within the contextof the industryComprehensiveevaluation of theproblem,demonstrating skilfulapplication of DesignThinking, and in-depthevidence-basedanalysis of businesscontext. Persuasiveidentification ofrelevant additionalfactors that influencethe problem andpossible alternativeconsiderations orperspectives on theproblem.Clear evaluation of theproblem,demonstratingapplication of DesignThinking, andconsistent evidencebased analysis ofbusiness context.Accurate identificationof relevant additionalfactors that influencethe problem andpossible alternativeconsiderations orperspectives on theproblem.Broad evaluation ofthe problem,demonstratingapplication of DesignThinking, andconsistent evidencebased analysis ofbusiness context.Reasonableidentification ofrelevant additionalfactors that influencethe problem andpossible alternativeconsiderations orperspectives on theproblem.Adequate evaluationof the problem, usingDesign Thinkingprinciples, andconsistent evidencebased analysis ofbusiness context.Limited identificationof relevant additionalfactors that influencethe problem andpossible alternativeconsiderations orperspectives on theproblem.Unclear evaluation ofthe problem, with noor little use of DesignThinking, or evidencebased analysis ofbusiness context.Incompleteidentification ofrelevant additionalfactors that influencethe problem andpossible alternativeconsiderations orperspectives on theproblem.8.0 to >6.39 pts6.39 to >5.59 pts5.59 to >4.79 pts4.79 to >3.99 pts3.99 to >0 pts8.0Criterion 2Devise a compelling response tothe requirements of the RFPComprehensiveresponse torequirements thataddresses problemaccurately with a setof deliverables,compellingexplanation ofapproach, andstrategically alignedmethodology.Clear response torequirements thataddresses problemwith a set ofdeliverables with alogical explanation ofapproach andstrategically alignedmethodology.General response torequirements thataddresses problemwith a set ofdeliverables with areasonableexplanation ofapproach andstrategically alignedmethodology.Partial response torequirements thataddresses problemwith a set ofdeliverables with anadequate explanationof approach andstrategically alignedmethodology.Inadequate responseto requirements thataddresses problemwith a set ofdeliverables withincompleteexplanation ofapproach andstrategically alignedmethodology.8.0 to >6.39 pts6.39 to >5.59 pts5.59 to >4.79 pts4.79 to >3.99 pts3.99 to >0 pts8.0 8 Criterion 3Articulate a clear and logicalsolution that addresses ethicsand sustainability, and adds valueto the businessEffectively engagesthe client through apersuasive plan tomeet requirements,that aligns to businessvalue, provides a clearand thoroughschedule aligned toresourcing, andprovides a compellingargument for theintegration of ethicsand sustainability.Effectively engagesthe client through anaccurate andconsistent plan tomeet requirements,that aligns to businessvalue, includes a clearschedule aligned toresourcing andprovides an effectiveargument for theintegration of ethicsand sustainability.Engages the clientwith a reasonable planto meet requirements,that aligns to businessvalue, provides apartially consistentschedule aligned toresourcing andincludes an argumentfor the integration ofethics andsustainability.Engages the clientwith adequate plan tomeet requirements,that refers to businessvalue, includes alimited schedulealigned to resourcing,and refers to issues ofethics andsustainability.Inadequate plan fordelivering project tomeet requirements,with limited or noalignment to businessvalue, an unclearschedule aligned toresourcing andminimal or noreference to ethicsand sustainability.8.0 to >6.39 pts6.39 to >5.59 pts5.59 to >4.79 pts4.79 to >3.99 pts3.99 to >0 pts8.0Criterion 4Apply and articulateinterpersonal skills that can beused to work in teamsComprehensiveanalysis of value ofteamwork in thegeneration of theirresponse to the RFP,and insightfulreflection on howinterpersonal skillscontributed to thefunctioning of theteam.Thorough analysis ofvalue of teamwork inthe generation of theirresponse to the RFP,and meaningfulreflection on howinterpersonal skillscontributed to thefunctioning of theteam.Reasonable analysis ofvalue of teamwork inthe generation of theirresponse to the RFP,and reflection on howinterpersonal skillscontributed to thefunctioning of theteam.Adequate analysis ofvalue of teamwork inthe generation of theirresponse to the RFP,with limited reflectionon how interpersonalskills contributed tothe functioning of theteam.Inadequate analysis ofvalue of teamwork inthe generation of theirresponse to the RFP,and little or noreflection on howinterpersonal skillscontributed to thefunctioning of theteam.3.0 to >2.39 pts2.39 to >2.09 pts2.09 to >1.79 pts1.79 to >1.49 pts1.49 to >0 pts3.0 9 Criterion 5Model clear and concise writtenand verbal skills within requiredpresentation context as well asappropriate supporting evidencewhether verbal informationreference or written referenceConsistently clear styleand use of language inthe reportencouraging ease ofcomprehension andinsightful conclusions;report referencingfully follows Harvardreferencingmethodology in textand at the end of thereport. Presentationaids support the mainpoints in a logical andclear way and is wellorganised, well-timedclear and has a logicalstructure.Clear style, contentand language; easy toread and drawconclusions; no morethan two errors;referencing partiallyfollows Harvardreferencingmethodology in textand at the end of thereport. Presentationaids support the mainpoints in a logical wayand is organised andtimed with a logicalstructure.Language issometimes easy todigest; languagesuccinct and wellchosen; less than fourerrors; referencingfollows Harvardreferencingmethodology at theend of the report text,but not in-text.Presentation aidssupport the mainpoints and isorganised, timed andstructured.Language is adequatewith acceptable logicflow and use oflanguage; somemisspellings andgrammatical errors;referencing partiallyfollows Harvardreferencingmethodology in textand does not follow atthe end of the report.Presentation aids areconnected to the mainpoints and issomewhat organisedtimed and structured.Language is confusing;logic, flow and use oflanguage difficult;many spelling andgrammatical errors;referencing does notfollow Harvardreferencingmethodology.Presentation wasdifficult to understandand/or poorly timedand/or organised.3.0 to >2.39 pts2.39 to >2.09 pts2.09 to >1.79 pts1.79 to >1.49 pts1.49 to >0 pts3.0Total:30 pts

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *