Data Structure and Algorithms | My Assignment Tutor

Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 1 of 3 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051ASSESSMENT BRIEF COURSE: Bachelor of ITUnit Code:DSAA204Unit Title:Data Structure and AlgorithmsType of Assessment:Assessment 4- Content Analysis (Reflective Journal)Length/Duration:2500 wordsUnit Learning Outcomesaddressed:a) Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of data structures andalgorithms.b) Demonstrate reasoning about efficiency of algorithms.c) Assess and apply suitable recursive data structures andalgorithms to IT systems and applications.Submission Date:Week 14Assessment Task:Students are required to analyse the lecture materials of Weeks 1 to 11 andcreate concise content analysis. This will include summaries of the theoreticalconcepts contained in the course lecture slides, covering definitions, analysisand examples.Total Mark:40 MarksWeighting:40%This is a final exam replacement assessment hence no extension is permitted.More information, please refer to (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> POLICY – Assessment Policy &Procedures – Student Login Required) Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 2 of 3 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:Students are required to analyse the weekly lecture material of weeks 1 to 11 and create concise contentanalysis summaries of the theoretical concepts contained in the course lecture slides.Where the lab content or information contained in technical articles from the Internet or books helps to fullydescribe the lecture slide content, discussion of such theoretical articles or discussion of the lab material shouldbe included in the content analysis.The document structure is as follows (2500 Words):1. Title Page2. Introduction and Background (150 words)3. Content analysis (reflective journals) for each week from 1 to 11 (2300 words; around 210 words perweek):a. Theoretical Discussioni. Topics Coveredii. Definitions and/or basic plans for Data Structure/Algorithm learnt in the lecture.iii. Mathematical Analysisb. Reflection on the Contentsi. Demonstrate understanding of the data structure/algorithm learnt in the lecture byapplying it on one of your own examples.c. Outcomei. What was the most important concept learnt?ii. How that concept (data structure/ algorithm) improves your knowledge in relation theconcepts learnt in the earlier lectures.4. Conclusion (50 words)Your report must include: At least five references, out of which, three references must be from academic resources. Harvard Australian referencing for any sources you use. Refer to the Academic Learning Skills student guide on Referencing.ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:This assignment should be submitted online in Moodle through Turnitin.The assignment MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format. Other formats may not bereadable by markers. Please be aware that any assessments submitted in other formats will be considered LATEand will lose marks until it is presented in Word.For assistance please speak to our Academic Learning Skills Coordinators, in Sydney ([email protected]) or inMelbourne ([email protected]). They can help you with understanding the task, draft checking, structure,referencing and other assignment-related mattersMARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC):Students will be awarded marks based on following criteria Marking CriteriaMarksTheoretical Discussion(Topics, definitions, analysis)Content precisely presentedbased on references3+6+3=1232 marksReflection15Outcome2+3= 5 Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 3 of 3 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051 (Important concept learnt,enhancement in knowledge)Presentation (Layout, no grammatical errors, reads well, etc.)4 MarksCited references4 MarksTotal marks for content analysis assignment40 Marks GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKSContent for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion.Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop anddemonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high-quality work presented by a studentmust be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends yourefer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System(Moodle). For details please click the link download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooksand information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of eachTrimester.Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwisespecifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, anypaper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed.Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “HarvardReferencing Workbook” will be penalised.Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Taskin the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it isgenerally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCINGReferences are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books,chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but notthe Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their ownresearch. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-textreferences (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original. Beforepreparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarismthrough Referencing) by clicking on the following link: link: search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be locatedin the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, onlinedictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, butshould not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources.Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such asgovernment departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC),or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations andgovernment departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostlyvery current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites(Why can’t I just Google?): you to La Trobe University for access to this video).


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *