Organisational Change and Innovation | My Assignment Tutor

Page 1 Kaplan Business School Assessment OutlineAssessment 3 Information Subject Code:MBA613Subject Name:Organisational Change and InnovationAssessment Title:PART A – Framework (Group Activity)PART B – Case Study (Individual)Assessment Type:In-Class Framework Activity and Individual ReportWord Count:1500Words(+/-10%)Weighting:40 % – PART A (15%) and PART B (25%)Total Marks:40Submission:PART A – In-Class Group Activity (Submitted in-class)PART B – Individual Report (Submitted via Turnitin)Due Date:PART A – In-Class Group Activity (Week 11 and Week 12)PART B – Week 13, Tuesday at 11.55pm Your TaskThis Assessment Task focusses on the analysis of a Contemporary Case Study. There are two corecomponents to this activity: to develop a draft framework (plan) as a group in-class activity and then usingthat framework (plan) create an individual report based on your analysis as it relates to the Case Study.Assessment DescriptionPART A (In-Class Report Framework)In Weeks 11/12 in-class groups (of 4 students) will be formed to work together, share ideas, discuss thecase study concepts and work on preparing your individual draft framework/plan in response to the CaseStudy provided.As part of the in-class activities, you will develop a draft report framework. Attendance at these classesis required, to assist you in preparing your individual report. Each student will individually submit a copyof their framework via Moodle and their individual report via Turnitin.PART B. (Individual)You will conduct an analysis of the key concepts identified by the Case Study and the associated four (4)questions. The Case Study will enable you to explore contemporary themes in relation to organisationalchange and innovation. You will be provided the Case Study by Week 6 on” Implementing organisationaltransformation in Auzee Engineering Services (AES)”.The group-work in-class component will enable you to use the framework/plan that you developed as partof your group to develop your individual report.Page 2 Kaplan Business School Assessment OutlineAssessment Instructions• Using a Report Format, include the following components:o Introduction (200 words)o Question One (Organisational Change and Transformation) (350 words)o Question Two (Definitive Theory of Organisational Change) (350 words)o Question Three (Implementing Change and Management) (350 words)o Conclusion (250 words)o Reference List (using the Harvard Referencing Convention throughout your report andreference list at the end)• You should include a minimum of 5 references (contemporary business articles, news items and/orcomparison websites) to support your analysis.• Please refer to the Assessment Marking Guide to assist you in completing all the assessment criteria.Important Study InformationAcademic Integrity PolicyKBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequencesof cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and ConductPolicy.What is academic integrity and misconduct?What are the penalties for academic misconduct?What are the late penalties?How can I appeal my grade?Click here for answers to these questions:http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.Word Limits for Written AssessmentsSubmissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the pointat which that limit is exceeded.Study AssistanceStudents may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to theresources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.Page 3 Kaplan Business School Assessment OutlineAssessment Marking Guide CriterionFailPassCreditDistinctionHigh DistinctionIn-Class DraftReport Framework(5 Marks)No attendance/contribution toin-class activities anddevelopment of the draftframework.No evidence of participationMinimal contribution to in-classactivities and development ofthe draft framework.Attendance at only one class orless and minimal evidence ofparticipationGood contribution to in-classactivities and development of thedraft framework.Attendance and some activeparticipation at both classesConsistently high levels ofcontribution to in-class activities anddevelopment of the draft framework.Attendance and active participation atboth classesExceptionally high levels ofcontribution to in-class activities anddevelopment of the draft framework.Attendance and active participation atboth classesResearch andapplication oftheories to the CaseStudy(10 Marks)No demonstratedunderstanding of the keyconcepts in the Case StudyNo demonstrated evidence ofindependentresearch/ideas/application oftheories to the Case StudyMinimal demonstratedunderstanding of the keyconcepts in the Case StudyMinimal, demonstratedevidence of independentresearch/ideas/application oftheories to the Case StudyGood, demonstrated understandingof the key concepts in the CaseStudy.Good, demonstrated evidence ofindependentresearch/ideas/application of theoriesto the Case StudyVery good, demonstratedunderstanding of the key concepts inthe Case Study.Very good, demonstrated evidence ofindependentresearch/ideas/application of theoriesto the Case StudyExcellent demonstratedunderstanding of the key concepts inthe Case Study.Excellent demonstrated evidence ofindependentresearch/ideas/application of theoriesto the Case StudyOrganisationalChange andTransformation(5 marks)The theories and conceptsof organisational changeand transformation wereeither not present and notconnected to the questionsand/or related the CaseStudy.The theories and conceptsof organisational changeand transformation wereincluded but not wellconnected to the questionsand/or the Case Study.The theories and concepts oforganisational change andtransformation and responses tothe question were connected tothe Case Study and questions.The theories and concepts oforganisational change andtransformation and responses tothe question were very wellconnected to the Case Study andquestionsThe theories and concepts oforganisational change andtransformation and responses tothe question were excellentlyconnected to the Case Study andquestions.Definitive Theory ofOrganisationalChange(10 marks)The definitive theories andconcepts of OrganisationalChange are either notpresent or inaccurate. Limitedrelationship to the CaseStudyThe definitive theories andconcepts of OrganisationalChange have limited detailsand linkage to the CaseStudy. Was not wellconnected.The definitive theories andconcepts of OrganisationalChange are solid but could belinked to the Case Study and in amore articulate and succinctmanner.The definitive theories andconcepts of OrganisationalChange are excellent, connectedand worded well only minorimprovements in linking thediscussion to the Case Study areneeded.The definitive theories andconcepts of OrganisationalChange are excellent, very wellconnected and expertly wordedbut also supported by excellentlinkages to the Case Study.OrganisationalChange andManagement(5 marks)The theories and concepts ofOrganisational Change andManagement are either notpresent or inaccurate. Limitedrelationship to the CaseStudyThe theories and conceptsof Organisational Changeand Management havelimited details and linkage tothe Case Study was not wellconnected.The theories and concepts ofOrganisational Change andManagement are solid but couldbe linked to the Case Study in amore articulate and succinctmanner.The theories and concepts ofOrganisational Change andManagement are excellent,connected and worded well onlyminor improvements in linking thediscussion to the Case Study areneeded.The theories and concepts ofOrganisational Change andManagement are excellent, verywell connected and expertlyworded but also supported byexcellent linkages to the CaseStudy.Overall structureResearch andReferencing(5 Marks)The intro, conclusion and/orresearch/referencing are eithermissing or have failed to meetthe minimum standards ofpostgraduate study.Intro and conclusion areminimal but sufficient, andresearch/referencing is presentbut limited. Major improvementsneeded.Intro and conclusion are very goodbut could be more comprehensive.Research/Referencing is fine, butinconsistencies exist.Impressive attempts are obvious interms of the intro, conclusion andresearch/referencing, but there isscope for some improvement.The intro clearly states the aims andstructure; the conclusion is a solidsummary; and Harvard referencing isused correctly and the quality ofresearch was excellent

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *