PROJECT PRESENTATION | My Assignment Tutor

TBUS610 E-Commerce PROJECT PRESENTATION Marking Rubric Grade / CriteriaFailPassCreditDistinctionHDRelevance of the Content (40%)Little to range of information used to develop the report. No Application of relevant theory /concepts No information presented and analysed No recommendations or possible options consideredBasic range of information used to develop the report. Little Application of relevant theory / concepts Basic information presented and analysed Basic recommendations or possible options consideredGood range of information used to develop the report. Good Application of relevant theory / concepts Good information presented and analysed Good recommendations or possible options consideredExcellent range of information used to develop the report. Excellent Application of relevant theory / concepts Excellent information presented and analysed Excellent recommendations or possible options consideredOutstanding and a wide range of information used to develop the report. Complete application of relevant theory / concepts Outstanding analysis of information presented Outstanding recommendations or possible options consideredPresentation and Communication Skills (40%)Presentation could not be easily understood because there was inadequate logical sequencing of information; presenter/s used superfluous graphics or no graphics.Presented in a sequence that the audience could follow; graphics supported and were related to some key components of the project.Presented in a sequence that the audience could readily follow; graphics supported and were related to the components of the project.Presented in a logical, interesting, and effective sequence, which the audience could easily follow; presentation used appropriate graphics to explain and reinforce the information presented.Presented in a logical, interesting, and highly effective sequence, which the audience could easily follow; presentation used effective graphics to explain and reinforce the information presented.Audience Engagement (20%)Presenter/s read most or all of the report with little or no eye contact; presenter/s mumbled, and/or spoke too quietly; presentation was unclear, and could not easily be followed by the audience; some presenters could not answer basic questions.Presenter/s maintained eye contact with the audience with a few minor exceptions; Presenter/s read from notes on a few occasions; some presenter/s used good voice dynamics; presenter/s adequately answered some questions well; overall, the presentation was delivered in a satisfactory manner.Presenter/s maintained eye contact with the audience infrequently returning to notes. Most presenter/s used sound voice dynamics; presenter/s answered questions well; overall, the presentation was delivered in an above average manner and met expectations with respect to most oral communication skills.Presenter/s maintained eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes; presenter/s spoke in a clear voice; presentation was generally thorough, clear, informative, and competently delivered; presenter/s were mostly professional, confident, comfortable, and answered questions well.Presenter/s maintained eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes; presenter/s were persuasive and delivered in a clear voice; presentation was thorough, clear, compelling, informative, and professionally delivered; presenter/s were professional, confident, comfortable, and answered questions effectively.

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *