Risk Management in Engineering (49006) | My Assignment Tutor

Faculty of Engineering and ITRisk Management in Engineering (49006)Subject Coordinator and Instructor: Dr. Mohsen NaderpourAssessment Task 3 – Risk Paper1 | P a g eSpecification: Weight50%TypeIndividualMinimumrequirements• Original implementation of two quantitative risk assessment/decisionmaking techniques• 6 to 8 pages (including references and appendices) in IEEE templateavailable on CanvasNote:• Papers without relevant and original risk technique implementation ornot conforming to the IEEE style or page limits are not markedSubmission• Online through the Turnitin submission link on Canvas• Multiple attempts permitted until the due date• No FEIT assignment submission cover sheet is requiredSimilarity• There is no numerical threshold to show a student has plagiarized ornot. The human academic checks for plagiarism. Turnitin can onlyindicate where and when a text appears similar to another text• 20% self-similarity to assessments 1 and 2 is acceptableDue dateRefer to the subject calendar Objective: ▪ Assess, evaluate, prioritise, and treat risks in engineering projects and systems lifecycle Topics: ▪ Domino effects: Domino effects are referred to a chain of accidents in which a primary accidentstarting in a unit spreads to adjacent units, causing secondary accidents the total consequence ofwhich could be much more severe than the primary event.▪ Natechs: Natechs are referred to technological accidents such as release of hazardous materials,fires or explosions in industrial plants which are triggered by natural disasters like earthquakes,floods, and hurricanes. Compared to normal technological accidents, which are a matter ofrandom failures or human error, natechs usually give rise to more catastrophic consequences sincethe likelihood of simultaneous damage to hazardous units and domino effects is much higher.▪ Land use planning: Land use planning (LUP) as an effective and crucial safety measure haswidely been employed by safety experts and decision makers to mitigate off-site risks posed bymajor accidents. Accordingly, the concept of LUP in industrial plants has traditionally beenconsidered from two perspectives: (i) land developments around existing industrial plantsconsidering potential off-site risks posed by major accidents and (ii) development of existingindustrial plants considering nearby land developments and the level of additional off-site risksthe land developments would be exposed to. Faculty of Engineering and ITRisk Management in Engineering (49006)Subject Coordinator and Instructor: Dr. Mohsen NaderpourAssessment Task 3 – Risk Paper2 | P a g e ▪ Human error: Humans play an important role during the design, installation, production, andmaintenance phases of a product or system. Human error may be defined as the failure to performa specified task (or the performance of a forbidden action) that could lead to disruption ofscheduled operations or result in damage to property and equipment.▪ Security: This area involves estimating access and harm caused due to war, terrorism, riot, crime(vandalism, theft, etc.), and misappropriation of information (national security information,intellectual property, etc.).▪ Environmental damages: This field involves estimating losses due to noise, contamination, andpollution in the ecosystem (water, land, air, and atmosphere) and in space (space debris). Introduction:To have a thorough understanding of what constitutes engineering risk management and howtheories, concepts, methods, etc. can be employed in industrial practice, this assignment provides theopportunity for students to put their knowledge into practice by implementing the quantitative riskassessment and risk-based decision making methods in a case study investigated in assessment 1. As itis vital for students to be able to communicate and present their results in their disciplines, the IEEEtemplate which is used by many engineering journals and conferences is adopted for the sake ofpresentation.Instructions:1. By now, you have selected your topic and case studies.2. Research your topic by reading and analysing at least 10 recent journal papers.3. Study Canvas Module 6 before starting to write your paper to learn the structure, components andingredients of a scientific paper.4. Decide a good title for your paper considering your topic and case study. Title should accuratelyreflect the paper main idea and its content.5. Write a 200-words abstract including motivation for the study, objective(s), methods, and resultsand interpretation.6. Write a good introduction including contextualization, topic importance, case study introduction,paper objective(s), problem-solving approach, and finally the paper structure.7. Review the literature including problem background and related works, more recent referenceswould be better. The main keyword definitions should be presented here. You may have some subsections to organize this section very well.8. Develop a research methodology to assess and reduce risks. You need to incorporate at least twotechniques in the research methodology from the literature. Do not limit yourselves to the subjectmaterials. The methodology should be logical and robust to support the discussion.Faculty of Engineering and ITRisk Management in Engineering (49006)Subject Coordinator and Instructor: Dr. Mohsen NaderpourAssessment Task 3 – Risk Paper3 | P a g e9. Implement the research methodology in the case study step by step and present the results. Analysethe results and highlight major findings. Tables and figures should be represented in high qualitywith adequate explanation.10. Discuss the results and do a sensitivity analysis to make sure the results are reliable. Propose somerisk reduction strategies and show unacceptable risks are managed. Limitations of the work mustbe listed as well.11. Write a conclusion of what have been done for what purpose, what are the findings, and proposesome future research directions.12. All content must be written without grammatical errors in IEEE template (available on Canvas) andmust be fully referenced. Include references at the end of paper consistently aligned with IEEEstyle.13. Therefore, the paper follows below structure:▪ Title▪ Abstract▪ Introduction▪ Theoretical background (literature review)▪ Research methodology▪ Implementation and results (case study)▪ Discussion▪ Conclusion and future works▪ ReferencesMarking Criteria SectionWeightCriteriaScoreTitle3Declarative or descriptive title reflecting the mainidea and the content3Abstract and keywords5Capture the essence of findingsThree to five keywords5Introduction10ContextualizationImportance/Relevance of the themeResearch question(s)Research objective(s)Paper structure10Theoretical background12Review relevant literature12Research methodology15Appropriate combination of methods:▪ At least two quantitative risk assessmenttechniquesOr15 Faculty of Engineering and ITRisk Management in Engineering (49006)Subject Coordinator and Instructor: Dr. Mohsen NaderpourAssessment Task 3 – Risk Paper4 | P a g e ▪ One quantitative risk assessment technique,one risk-based decision-making techniqueImplementation andresults25Enough case study description5Correct implementation of the researchmethodology10Original results analysis10Discussion10Sensitivity analysis, risk reduction strategies, worklimitations10Conclusion and futureworks5Summarize the paper and suggest future researchdirections5References5Fully in-text referencing along with a list of 10+relevant high-quality journal papers5Structure and presentation10Well-structured and well-presented withoutgrammatical errors5Conform to the IEEE template and referencing style5Sum100 Weighting Matrix (W) 2 quantitativemethods areimplemented1 quantitativemethod isimplementedSolutions aresimpleQualitativemethods areimplementedPaper is in the IEEE style10.50.250Paper is not in the IEEEstyle0000Paper is in the IEEE stylebut less than 6 pages0000Paper is in the IEEE stylebut more than 8 pages0.750.30.10 Mark Individual mark= Sum*W


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *