Managing Tour & Hosp Workforce | My Assignment Tutor

AGriffithUNIVERSITYRubric 58202ALEC – RubricBuilderRubric BuilderProgram Semester OfferingMITHM Trimester 1 2021Course Code 7205THS Course Title Managing Tour & Hosp Workforce Assessment Task A3 Industry Compendium Assessment Weighting 50Objective NameCritical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%Critical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%Critical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%Critical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%Critical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%Critical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%CriteriaVIGNETTE 1 Reason 1VIGNETTE 1 Reason 1VIGNETTE 1 Reason 1VIGNETTE 1 Reason 1Format requirements. No cut and paste. Coherent and professional. Use of appropriate academic journal literature and referencing.VIGNETTE 2 Activity 1Critical VIGNETTE 2 Activity Analysis, 2 problem solving and evaluation 5% Critical VIGNETTE 2 Activity Analysis, 3 problem solving and evaluation 5%Critical VIGNETTE 2 Activity Analysis, 4 problem solving and evaluation5%Critical Analysis, problem solving and evaluation 5%Format requirements. No cut and paste. Coherent and professional. Use of appropriate academic journal literature and referencing.Personal 4% Employment and Educational Background. Information provided.ExcellentExtremely well considered and logically reasoned.Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.Extremely well presented professional document.Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.Extremely well considered and logically reasoned.Extremely well presented professional document.nVery GoodVery well considered with some sound logical reasoning.Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.Generally well presented professional document.Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.Very well considered with some sound logical reasoning.Generally well presented professional document.nGoodGenerally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.Well presented overall with some minor format and presentation elements not followed.Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.Generally well considered with some effort to support reasoning.Well presented overall with some minor format and presentation elements not followed.nSatisfactoryA very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.Some parts of the document well presented however other parts not following guidelines or difficult to follow..A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.UnsatisfactoryPoor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.Very poorly presented and difficult to follow at times due to disorganised presentation. Many guidelines not seeming to be followed.Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.A very basic consideration with limited or no real coherence supporting the position.Some parts of the document well presented however other parts not following guidelines or difficult to follow..nPoor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.Poor to no actual logical consideration provided for reasoning. Difficult to follow and understand.Very poorly presented and difficult to follow at times due to disorganised presentation. Many guidelines not seeming to be followed.Personal Employment and Educational Background. Information NOT provided.https://app.secure.griffith.edu.au/alec/index.php?v=print_preview&a=3&rubric_id=58202 1/2

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *