Case Study Report Criteria Rubric | My Assignment Tutor

IBU5HRM A3 Case Study Report Criteria Rubric — Weighting: 40% In Assessment 1 the issues (four concepts) were clearly provided in the criteria. You are an International HRM consultant for the case study. In this assessment you need to use your consultative skills to identify the issues, relate them to HRM and develop a plan to ensure the issues are overcome.Student Name: Student ID _L _L1 _L1 I Total: _L/40N 49 or less% D 50-59% C 60-69% B 70-79% A 80-100% Your Score Introduction (10) No clear purpose, scope or limitations or identification of the case study; No clear understanding of the context of the organisation — case study. No organisation/order of each section of the report. Basic understanding of purpose, scope and limitations; Basic outline of case study and understanding of the context of the organisation — case study. Reasonable organisation/order of each section of the report. Clear and concise purpose, scope and limitations; Developed description of the case study and understanding of the context of the organisation — case study. Succinct organisation/order of each section of the report. Clear and purposeful outline of purpose, scope and limitations; The case study context well developed. Clear and concise organisation/order of each section of the report. Excellent outline of purpose, scope and limitations; The case study and context explained at an advanced level. Excellent understanding of the organisation. Outstanding organisation/order of each section of the report. 0-4.5 5-5.5 6-6.5 7-7.5 8-10 What are the issues in the case? Identify and critically discuss the issues in this case — must include operations across different countries, customer and staffing issues. (20) No evidence of understanding or evaluating the issues in the case study. No summary of main theories and concepts; No critical analysis of the literature. Basic ideas formulated to link to the organisational context and the issues in the case study; Fundamental theories and concepts summarised. Simple analysis of the literature. Ability to conceptualise and describe the issues in the case study; Evidence of critical analysis. Clear and concise description of the organisational context and issues in the case study; Evidence of comprehensive critical analysis. Report outlines the organisational context and the issues in the case study. High level of interpretative and analytical ability to critically analyse literature. 0-9.5 10-11.5 12-13.5 14-15.5 16-20 How should FIRM deal with the issues in the case? Explain how FIRM should ensure the issues are not repeated taking into consideration the international environment. (40) No demonstrated ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. No critical analysis of the literature. Demonstrates basic ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. Displays basic information. Simple analysis of the literature. Demonstrates consistent ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. Evidence of critical analysis. Demonstrates thoroughly consistent ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development Evidence of comprehensive critical analysis. Demonstrates outstanding ability to evaluate international performance management and training and development. High level of interpretative and analytical ability to critically analyse literature. 0-19.5 20-23.5 24-27.5 28-31.5 32-40 Conclusion and Recommendation/s/ Solution/s and Implementation Plan. What is your plan as an International FIRM consultant to present to the company/case study (10) Conclusion does not summarise the report; No clear recommendations or implementation plan. Reasonably clear summary of the report; Recommendations link well to the identified issues and implementation plan evident. Above average ability to summarise the report; Sound recommendations related to the identified issues and implementation plan well planned. Ability to make sound evaluation of the report; Good ability to make sound recommendations relative to the identified issues and implementation plan very well developed. An insightful and comprehensive summary of the report; Outstanding capacity to make recommendations for effective solutions relative to the identified issues and implementation plan exceptionally well developed. 0-4.5 5-5.5 6-6.5 7-7.5 8-10 Research and Referencing (10) Inadequate reading and research — less than 15 References(beyond2007) less than 5 refereed journal articles(beyond2007) Minimal reading and research — Reading and research beyond basic 15References(beyond2007) set minimum. 5 refereed joumals:(beyond 2007); Use of relevant research to Limited use of relevant research, support findings; demonstrating little engagement Reasonable application of with literature; referencing throughout the Evidence of wide reading and research; Evidence of critical and analytical use of relevant literature; Evidence of extensive reading and research; Relevant literature used critically and analytically, presenting a balance of perspectives

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *