BUS2003/SBM3204 Sustainability and Ethics | My Assignment Tutor

Assessment Brief: BUS2003/SBM3204 Sustainability and EthicsTrimester-2 2021Assessment Overview Assessment TaskTypeWeightLengthDueULOsAssessedAssessment 1: Debate & ReportStudents will undertake a debate on a topicprovided by the lecturerGroupInvigilated30%20mins/1500wordsWeek 5ULO-1ULO-2ULO-3ULO-5Assessment 2: Case StudyStudents will be given a case study whichwill be provided by the lecturerIndividualInvigilated40%2500wordsWeek 7ULO-1ULO-2ULO-3ULO-4Assessment 3: Viva VoceA Viva Voce assessment is an oralexamination and verbal defence of awritten assessment. The writtenassessment for the Viva Voce assessment isbased on Assessment 2: Case Study, whichwas submitted in Week 7.IndividualInvigilated30%15 mins(equiv.1500words)Week10ULO-1ULO-2ULO-3ULO-5 equiv. – equivalent word count based on the Assessment Load Equivalence Guide. It means this assessment isequivalent to the normally expected time requirement for a written submission containing the specifiednumber of words.Assessment 1: Debate & Report Due date:Week 5Group/individual:Group, Marked Ind.Word count/Time provided:20 mins/1500 wordsWeighting:30%Unit Learning Outcomes:[ULO1], [ULO2], [ULO3], [ULO5] Assessment 1 DetailStudent will be formed into groups of 4 students to conduct debates based on the topics provided byLecturer. After the debates, each group is required to write up a debate report based on one ofdebate topics provided by the Lecturer. The assessment includes the following key components:1. Introduction2. Proposition 1 (support the resolution):– Logical arguments for Proposition 1– Gathered supporting evidence and examples for position taken– Relevant theories learnt to support the arguments3. Proposition 2 (against the resolution)– Logical arguments for Proposition 2– Gathered supporting evidence and examples for position taken– Relevant theories learnt to support the argument4. Conclusion– Your final thoughts and opinionsThe business report format is required for the individual assignment. The headings and subheadingsare strongly recommended to structure the business report. The Harvard Referencing Style isrequired. For detailed requirement, please refer to the guidelines of how to write Business Reportand academic writing style. It is strongly recommended to review SLS learning Enhancement Sectionin APIC Canvas. The link of Business Report Guideline was provided in the assessment section of thissubject in APIC Canvas.Assessment 1 Marking Criteria and RubricThe assessment will be marked out of 100% and will be weighted at 30% of the total unit mark. Themarking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.Assessment 1 Marking Criteria and Rubric Marking CriteriaNot Satisfactory(0-49% of the criterionmark)Satisfactory(50-64% of the criterionmark)Good(65-74% of the criterionmark)Very Good(75-84% of the criterionmark)Excellent(85-100% of the criterionmark)Ethical considerationDemonstrate anunderstanding of theimportance of ethicalconsiderations(40%)Inadequate understandingof the importance of ethicalconsiderations.Basic knowledge of theimportance of ethicalconsiderations.Exhibits breadth and depthof understanding of theimportance of ethicalconsiderations.Exhibits accurate anddetailed breadth and depthof understanding of theimportance of ethicalconsiderations.Displays exceptional abilityin and understanding of theimportance of ethicalconsiderations..CommunicationClear and convincingcommunication(40%)Poorly articulated,unconvincing argument.Basic communication ofsome facts in support of oneside of the argument.Evidence of both presentingan argument and refuting analternative position.Above average use ofevidence to support aposition and refute thealternative.Sophisticated use ofevidence to support aposition and refute thealternative.Report presentation andreferencing(20%)Poor presentation report.Poor writing skills withgrammar and spellingerrors. Fail to follow Harvardreferencing style.Satisfactory presentationformat and writing skillswith some grammar andspelling errors. Fail to followHarvard referencing style.Good presentation formatand writing skills withspelling errors. FollowHarvard referencing styleExcellent presentationformat and writing skillswithout spelling errors.Follow Harvard referencingstyle.Distinguished presentationformat and writing skills.Following Harvardreferencing stylecompletely.Effective communicationduring the debate(20%)Inadequate understandingof the importance of ethicalconsiderations during thedebate.Basic knowledge of theimportance of ethicalconsiderations during thedebate.Exhibits breadth and depthof understanding of theimportance of ethicalconsiderations during thedebate.Exhibits accurate anddetailed breadth and depthof understanding of theimportance of ethicalconsiderations during thedebate.Displays exceptional abilityin and understanding of theimportance of ethicalconsiderations during thedebate. Assessment 2: Case Study Due date:Week 7Group/individual:IndividualWord count/Time provided:2500 wordsWeighting:40%Unit Learning Outcomes:[ULO1], [ULO2], [ULO3], [ULO4] Assessment 2 DetailIn this case analysis, you need to identify an issue in business ethics and/or sustainability and demonstrate yourunderstanding of the discipline by evaluating your recommendations. You can investigate a real-life case froman organisation. Your lecturer will not assign you to a case study. You must discuss your choice of case studywith your lecturer by providing a verbal or written rationale for choosing a particular case study. Your lecturerneeds to approve your choice of case study in written format (APIC email). Plagiarised assignments will notbe tolerated.You need to consider a significant business ethics and/or sustainability issue. Do not consider multiple issues asit will degrade the quality of work. You need to consider yourself being a consultant helping with the issue. Yourlecturer is looking for creative solutions proposed by groups.Examples of issues could be:• Corporate Social Responsibility and stakeholders• Managing ethical issues• Ethical decision making• The role of corporate culture and ethical decision making• Ethics auditing• Ethical leadershipStudents will need to collect data from actual organisations and/or secondary sources. Valid sources forobtaining such data may include:• Visits to the case company and interviewing key personnel (if you choose to do this, interview questionsshould be included in appendices).• Secondary data from online (it should be reliable and valid online data sources such as data from otherresearch publications, databases and so on. (WIKIPEDIA is not a suitable one)• Company’s annual/quarterly reports• Related business strategy management articles and news.Structure and format of the report (Assessment 2)IntroductionThe introduction should include background to the project and an introduce the topic you are researching, andits importance followed by the case study objective and then the implications. More specifically- Introductionsection shall include what are you doing? Why (importance)? How (short methodology within 2-3 lines)? Whatare the contributions (to managers, literature)? Literature reviewReview the literature on the topic you are researching. Review of journal articles is preferred. Please makesure that your literature review reflects the understanding of business strategy management concepts forthe purpose of applying them and the application of theoretical concepts. More specifically you need towrite about the topic of your interest and relevant concepts based on previous studies. You need tomention what previous studies have investigated? What previous studies were not investigated (Researchgap)? What could be done? How your study addresses the gaps in the previous studies?MethodsHere you explain the methodology or sources of data/information and how do you collect. You should alsodescribe the type of data (qualitative or quantitative) and how collected data can be useful. You can collectdata from a real-life organisation or using secondary sources. You can also use some database such asScopus, google scholar, science direct and so on if you collect data from secondary sources. In thesedatabases, you can find lot of published papers with their own data; you can use them but must be cited.Please make sure that your method reflects the development of feasible and effective solutions to addressthe complex issue(s).Structure and format the case study findings and analysisProvide a description of the organisation in the case study (1/2 page). Then critically evaluate the ethicsand/or sustainability issue in the light of the literature and discuss the recommendations. Please make surethat your evaluation reflects the theoretical concepts underpinning the discipline of business ethics. Alsomake that your evaluation reflects the originality of potential solutions. (New techniques, knowledge,applications and management practice). Further, your evaluation shall reflect justification for innovativeideas and processes.ConclusionYou need to discuss your findings and how the findings can be helpful for the business and what are therisks for implementation. You should also discuss if there any limitation of the study. Conclusion opens witha summary of the report and then considers the consequences of the suggestions. No new material shouldbe introduced in this section.Appendices (if any) Your appendices may contain, for example, detailed tables of data, details of how youdid a calculation, interview records if included, or photographs if of some interest.References: The project is directed at the collection and analysis of data, if you use material from anothersource then references it properly. You need to cite 10-15 references from journal, report and so on. Avideo link for referencing style (Harvard referencing style) is available athttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iueqJ78iAwkOther important notes:• Use Font 12 Times new roman with 1.5 spacing, single column, justified and 2.5 cm margin in all foursides for the report body and submit a Microsoft Word file.• All assignments must include a group cover sheet which is downloadable from APIC website.• While your experience and views are the essential components of your assignments, the appropriateuse of literature is required to provide evidence-based suggestions. •You should include a list of all references you use in writing your assignments. Note that all assignmentswill be checked for originality (similarities to existing sources) on Turnitin. You should follow instructionof your lecture for attaching Turnitin report with your assignment.The criteria to assess your work will take into account:• Relevance of your answer to the question or task set• Clarity of expression• Creativity/innovation• Citations beyond the given subject material• Logical planning and sequence• Appropriate written and presentation of the work.• The assessment for individual group members may be moderated by students’ peer assessment(evaluating the performance of each group member).In completing this assessment successfully, you will be able to effectively to design and apply theknowledge, tools and techniques required to build better strategies in organisational context. Assessments 2 Marking Criteria and RubricThe assessment will be marked out of 100%and will be weighted 40% of the total unit mark. Themarking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.Assessment 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric Marking CriteriaNot satisfactory(0-49%) of thecriterion mark)Satisfactory(50-64%) of thecriterion markGood(65-74%) of thecriterion markVery Good(75-84%) of thecriterion markExcellent(85-100%) of the criterionmarkLiterature review aroundthe case study topic (40 %)Lacks basic knowledgeor/and skills ofconducting literaturereview and evaluating ofmajor issues related tobusiness ethics and/orsustainability.Evidence of basic knowledgeand skill of conductingliterature review andevaluating of major issuesrelated to business ethicsand/or sustainability.Has good skills ofconducting literaturereview and evaluatingmajor issues related tobusiness ethics and/orsustainability.Has very good skills in theevaluation of conductingliterature review andevaluating major issuesrelated to business ethicsand/or sustainability.Excellent skills of conductingliterature review and evaluatingmajor issues related to businessethics and/or sustainability.Methodology (30%)Lacks basic knowledgeor/and skills in theevaluation of theoreticalconcepts underpinningbusiness ethics and/orsustainability.Evidence of basic knowledgeand skill in the evaluation oftheoretical conceptsunderpinning businessethics and/or sustainability.Has good skills in theevaluation of theoreticalconcepts underpinningbusiness ethics and/orsustainability.Has very good skills in theevaluation of theoreticalconcepts underpinningbusiness ethics and/orsustainability.Excellent skills in the evaluationof theoretical conceptsunderpinning business ethicsand/or sustainability.Conclusion (20%)Lacks basic knowledgeor/and skills in reflectingconsideration of businessethics and/orsustainabilityEvidence of basic knowledgeand skill in reflectingconsideration of businessethics and/or sustainability.Has good skills in reflectingconsideration of businessethics and/orsustainability.Has very good skills inreflecting consideration ofbusiness ethics and/orsustainability.Excellent skills in reflectingconsideration of business ethicsand/or sustainability.References (Use at least tenacademic references &consistent in style) (10%)Poor academic writingskills with grammar andspelling errors. Poorpresentation structureSatisfactory writing skillswith grammar and spellingerrors. Poor presentationstructure and failed toGood academic writingskills with minor grammarand spelling errors. Clearpresentation structureExcellent writing skillswithout grammar andspelling errors. Excellentpresentation structureExceptional academic writingskills. Professional presentationstructure following Harvardreferencing style and failed to followHarvard referencing stylefollow Harvard referencingstylefollowing Harvardreferencing stylefollowing Harvardreferencing style Assessment 3: Viva Voce Due date:Week 10Group/individual:IndividualWord count/Time provided:15 minutes (equiv. 1500 words)Weighting:30%Unit Learning Outcomes:ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3, ULO-4, ULO-5 Assessment 3 DetailA Viva Voce assessment is an oral examination and verbal defence of a written assessment. Thewritten assessment for the Viva Voce assessment is based on Assessment 2: Case Study, which wassubmitted in Week 7. The details of the Viva questions for the oral and written examination will begiven by Lecture two weeks before the assessment due during the trimester.Assessments 3 Marking Criteria and RubricThe assessment will be marked out of 100% and will be weighted at 30% of the total unit mark. Themarking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.Assessment 3 Marking Criteria and Rubric Marking CriteriaNot Satisfactory(0-49% of the criterionmark)Satisfactory(50-64% of the criterionmark)Good(65-74% of the criterionmark)Very Good(75-84% of the criterionmark)Excellent(85-100% of the criterionmark)Demonstrate anunderstanding of the Viva(Case Study evaluation)questions in oralexamination (20%)Inadequate understandingof the Viva questions (CaseStudy evaluation) and majorissues are not identifiedBasic understanding of theViva questions (Case Studyevaluation) and major issueswere identified partiallyExhibits breadth and depthof understanding of the Vivaquestions (Case Studyevaluation) and major issueswere identified clearlyExhibits accurate anddetailed breadth and depthof understanding of the Viva(Case Study evaluation)questions and major issueswere discussed wellDisplays exceptional abilityin and understanding of theViva questions (Case Studyevaluation) and major issueswere discussed critically.Demonstrate anunderstanding of the Vivaquestions in writtenexamination (20%)Inadequate understandingof the Viva questions (CaseStudy evaluation) and majorissues are not identifiedBasic understanding of theViva questions (Case Studyevaluation) and major issueswere identified partiallyExhibits breadth and depthof understanding of the Vivaquestions (Case Studyevaluation) and major issueswere identified clearlyExhibits accurate anddetailed breadth and depthof understanding of the Vivaquestions (Case Studyevaluation) and major issueswere discussed wellDisplays exceptional abilityin and understanding of theViva questions (Case Studyevaluation) and major issueswere discussed critically.Demonstrate analytical andcritical thinking skills (40%)Poorly articulated,unconvincing evidencesprovided. Lack of theoriesapplicationBasic communication ofsome facts in support ofcase solution. Lack of theoryapplicationEvidence of clear convincingfacts and evidencesprovided. Some theoriesapplied for the analysisAbove average use ofevidence to support thecase analysis. Good theoryapplicationSophisticated use ofevidence to support thecase analysis. Excellenttheory applicationPresentation andcommunication(20%)Poorly demonstrateprofessional presentationmanner with clear speechand right pace withenthusiasm.Satisfactory demonstrateprofessional presentationmanner with clear speechand right pace withenthusiasm.Good demonstrateprofessional presentationmanner with clear speechand right pace withenthusiasm.Very good demonstrateprofessional presentationmanner with clear speechand right pace withenthusiasm.Excellent demonstrateprofessional presentationmanner with clear speechand right pace withenthusiasm.

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *