FIN6C5 Global Banking | My Assignment Tutor

Assignment Brief Module Code and Title: FIN6C5 Global BankingAssignment Number & Title: Ass2. Individual Assignment ProjectAssessment Type: Individual Task Based CourseworkWeighting of assessment (%TMM) :50%Assessment Learning OutcomesUpon successful completion of this assessment the students will be able to:A7 Demonstrate an awareness of different ideas, contexts and frameworks; displaydetailed knowledge of well-established theories and concepts, and how relationshipswithin the area of specialisation shape the organisation’s future direction, governanceand stakeholders.A8 Demonstrate coherent understanding of the changing global environment and theimplications for organisations, including technological, social, geopolitical,environmental and economic change. Show cultural intelligence and ability to relate andto working effectively across cultures.Module Leader: Dr Christos KallandranisInternal Reviewer: Dr Elias BoukramiExternal Examiner:Submission DetailsSubmission Deadline: 16/05/2021, by 23:59 pm via BlackboardRelease of Feedback: 30/05/2021 1 Completing Your AssignmentWhat am I required to do in this assignment?In the wake of the global fnancial crisis, many commentators have posited that global fnancial integratonhas reversed and lots of things are about to change in the banking system. Although the collapse in capitalflows and signs of fnancial fragmentaton are well documented, the developments in the banking system, theimplementaton of certain regulatons are not as well documented, creatng some confusion on the actualfacts.This aim of this coursework is to analyse the developments taken place afer the fnancial crisis in the globalbanking system. You need to comment on whether the crisis has accelerated a number of structuraltransformatons and how this has affected the economic rebound.You will be asked to deliver an individual writen report of no more that 2,000 words, excluding the Appendixand the Bibliography. It is essental to use in your analysis, (if possible) general macroeconomic indicators,real datas, press, reports, datastream and mos important the relevant literature (try to link with the currentdevelopments in academic literature). The submission will take place in May 16th . Please follow up BBannouncements and the module’s handbook.For further details see in the end of the document.Is there a size limit? 2,000 words plus or minus 10%.What do I need to do to pass?The essay paper will be worth 50% of the total mark.You should show clear evidence of deep understanting, analytical skills, use of data and engagementthroughout the semester. The use also of cited relevant papers, professional or academic studiesand critical analysis of the current environment are vital ingedients for a successful completion.How do I produce high quality work that merits a 70% or above grade?You should follow closely the below mentioned requirements:Written essay mark (50%) will be assessed on the quality of your work with regard to: Justificationof topic, Content (structure, application of theory, relevance, data usage), Critical literature/theoryreview, Methodology, Choice of data set, Computations, Analysis, Conclusions. For example, creditwill be given to an integrative critical understanding, command of techniques, ability to formulate andtest concepts and hypotheses, and a critical analytical approach, as well as presentation andreferencing. The written assignment will require you to plan and prioritize your time. Further detailsare provided in the end of this document regarding the marking criteria of the written report.70%+ means: Overall excellent report, all aspects of brief addressed in full, insightful analysis andreflection throughout. Logical and insightful recommendations included which logically follow fromthe main body of the report.How does assignment relate to what we are doing in the scheduled sessions? 2 The individual report is closely related to the issue of banking institutions, banking management,money transfer, banking regulations and risk management. Hence, the projects follows 100% thelearning outcomes and the teaching material.How will I receive formative feedback for this assignment?Students should upload on the padlet a short plan of their assignment so as to get a formativefeedback before the final submission of the report. This is expected by at most week 11, hence in therevision of week 12 a Q&As discussion will be held during the webinar. 3Assessment criteria Marker’s commentsGradeDifferent risks that banks in different parts of theworld had accumulated Defne the risks Use real-life case studies to demonstratethe accumulaton of risks(out of 40)How the crash happened and spread throughdifferent parts of the world Short descripton of the process of thecrisis. Describe how the crisis has spreadthrough different regions of the world(out of 20)How regulators’ responses during and afer thecrisis have shaped the banking systems indifferent regions. Identfy regulators’ responses. How the new regulaton changed thebanking systems in different part of theworld.(out of 30)Presentaton of the reportProper references using valid source.Additonal graphs/data with comments will earnextra marks.(out of 10)TOTAL(out of 100) 4Summatve Assessment 2 (Individual Report)Discuss how has the global fnancial crisis 2007-2009 affected different banking systems in theworld? More specifcally, you need to: Provide details regarding different risks that banks in different parts of the world hadaccumulated pre-crisis. How the crash happened and spread through different parts of the world And how regulators’ responses during and afer the crisis have shaped the banking systemsin different regions. Demonstrate your arguments with real-life example and with market evidence (graphsshould be sufcient, there is no need to make any computaton) References reliable sources: academic journals, facts and fgures of reputable sources.The essay should be writen in academic style with academic references (peer-reviewed journals).Arguments should be supported by evidence (from the literature), and there should be arguments from bothsides (eg. Why frms should hedge risk?, and why frms should not hedge risk?). A list of references must beprovided at the end, and in-text references being done properly. The most popular reference style is Harvardstyle.This coursework accounts for 50% of your total module mark. There is maximum word limit of 2000 words.The assignment will be submited as a word document (.doc) on blackboard. Exact date TBAA short plan of your project should be uploaded on padlet by week 11 in order to get a formatvefeedback before submitng your fnal work.Plagiarism is heavily penalized.5Regent’s University Generic Descriptors BandConversionscale for UGProgrammesConversionscale for PGProgrammesGeneric descriptors890 – 10090 – 100All learning outcomes and task specifications have been achieved to an exceptionallyhigh standard (according to the level of study).The outcome of the assessment task is presentable in a professional context and mayextend practical or theoretical knowledge in the field. It displays an exceptionally highlevel of understanding, evaluation, insight, analysis, reflection and/or criticality (accordingto the level of study), and connections are developed both within and beyond the taskset.The work’s organisation, structure and presentation are developed to an exceptionallyhigh standard.780 – 8980 – 89All learning outcomes and task specifications have been achieved to an outstandingstandard (according to the level of study).The outcome of the assessment demonstrates an outstanding display of understanding,exploration, evaluation, insight, analysis, reflection, criticality and/or research (accordingto the level of study). Connections are developed both within and beyond the task set.The work’s organisation, structure and presentation are developed to an outstandingstandard.670 – 7970 – 79All learning outcomes and task specifications have been achieved to high standard(according to the level of study).The outcome of the assessment demonstrates an excellent display of understanding,exploration, evaluation, insight analysis, reflection, criticality and/or research (accordingto the level of study), and connections are developed both within and beyond the task set.The work’s organisation, structure and presentation may be developed to an excellentstandard.560 – 6960 – 69All learning outcomes have been achieved at a good and some to a very good standard(according to the level of study).The outcome of the assessment demonstrates a very good level of understanding,exploration, evaluation, analysis, reflection, criticality, some insight and/or very goodresearch (according to the level of study), and connections are established within the taskset, and in some cases reaching beyond.The work’s organisation, structure and presentation may be developed to a very goodstandard.450 – 5955 – 59Most learning outcomes have been met at a good standard (according to the level ofstudy).The outcome of the assessment demonstrates a good understanding, exploration,evaluation, analysis, and some reflection, criticality and/or appropriate research.(According to the level of study)The work’s organisation, structure and presentation may be appropriately developed. 6 340 – 4950 – 54All learning outcomes have been met to a minimum satisfactory standard (according tothe level of study).The outcome of the assessment shows an adequate understanding, of major ideas, withlittle insight and basic research. Limited level of analysis, reflection and/or criticality(according to the level of study).The outcome of the task shows ability to paraphrase concepts and theories, with limitedability to make connections.The work may be disorganised, and the structure and presentation may be barelyadequate.230 – 3936 – 49Most learning outcomes have almost been met, whilst the rest have not (according to thelevel of study).The outcome of the assessment shows a limited understanding of major ideas, with littleinsight, very basic research, and very limited ability to make connections. No analysis,reflection and/or criticality (according to the level of study)The work may be disorganised, and the structure and presentation may be barelyadequate.111 – 2921 – 35The majority of the learning outcomes have not been met (according to the Level). Theoutcome of the assessment task is incomplete, flawed, very limited and/or presentssignificant inaccuracies.The outcome of the assessment shows very limited understanding with no insight, andvery limited ability to make connections within basic ideas in the field, very fragmented.Lacks research. No analysis, reflection or criticality (according to the level of study)The work is disorganised, and unstructured. Presentation is barely adequate.00 – 100 – 20None of the learning outcomes have been met. The task has not been addressed by thestudent, or there is no assessable task.The outcome of the assessment shows no understanding of basic ideas, with no insightand shows no ability to make connections within basic ideas in the field, or theconnections are completely irrelevant. Lacks research. No understanding, analysis,reflection nor criticality.The work completely lacks organisation and structure. Presentation is completelyinadequate. 78

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *