Accounting and Managerial Finance | My Assignment Tutor

1MSc Finance and InvestmentModule: Accounting and Managerial Finance_____________________________________________________________Assignment Title: Analyzing the Annual ReportAssignment Type: Formal ReportWord Limit: 3000 words (+/- 300)Weighting: 100%Issue Date: 01/07/2021Submission Date: 15/07/2021Feedback Date: 30/07/2021Issued by: Dr. Kanika Gupta_____________________________________________________________Plagiarism:When submitting work for assessment, students should be aware of theInterActive/Canvas guidance and regulations in concerning plagiarism. All submissionsshould be your own, original work.You must submit an electronic copy of your work. Your submission will beelectronically checked. Learner declarationI certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own and research sourcesare fully acknowledged.Student signature: Date: Harvard Referencing:The Harvard Referencing System must be used. The Wikipedia, or similarwebsites must not be used or referenced in your work.Introduction2In this assessment, you are asked to conduct a financial analysis of a listed company ofyour choice. It must meet the following criteria:1. It should be listed on a stock exchange.2. It should NOT be a financial/ banking company because finance companies’ financialstatements are very different than other service/ manufacturing, etc.3. Must be a recent annual report, i.e. 2020.4. 2-3 students may be working on a same company, but everyone is required to submittheir own report, which is written individually and NOT as a group.5. The report must be available in English language.6. Should be able to identify a close competitor.Task 1: Conduct segment analysis of the chosen company and its competitor (5%)Task 2: Explain what is conceptual framework. Explain any three Assumptions/ Principles/Constraints and illustrate their applicability by showing examples from the chosen casecompany. (20%)Task 3: What is meant by financial position? What information in the balance sheet can be usedto assess a company’s solvency?Present the detailed analysis of company’s liquidity, solvency position, and profitability position.Your analysis must include reference to all four financial statements including cash flowstatement (40%)Task 4: Based upon historical data of the company, forecast the budget for the chosen companyand prepare the forecasted Profit and loss account (20%).Task 5: Explain the meaning and relevance of Job Order Costing and Absorption Costing andcritically analyze and illustrate their applicability to the chosen company.For getting higher grade, please follow following pre-requisite:1. Relevant theories must be elaborated.2. Both in-text and end-text referencing should be there in the paper. Do not useInvestopedia/ Wikipedia, but use books, journals, research papers, newspaperarticles, company publications.3. Extract as much information as possible from the annual reports. Mention pagenumber within in-text referencing4. Wider research should be visible. At master level, you should refer at least 15sources in an assignment.5. Remember to show all your calculations in detail. Only relevant data and tables andrelevant from spreadsheets should be included within the body of the analysis.36. Please embed your excel workings in the Word document itself, see following videoon how to do this: Learning Outcomes:Post this assignment, you will be able to Knowledge of:Synthesized key principles, contemporary trends, and tools inaccounting and corporate finance to maximise corporate valuewhile reducing the firm’s financial risks, using literature,undertaking research, and advancing knowledge.LO1Knowledge of:The critical development of leading-edge approaches to the criticalanalysis of corporate finance structure and analysis of corporatefinancial statements using tools and techniques that are applicableLO2Understanding through application of:A critical assessment of the application of contemporary modelsand theories to decisions on corporate financing and using internaland external financial information to critical appraise businessperformance.LO3Understanding through application of:A critical evaluation of the economic benefits of various types offinancing on businesses in complex international environment.LO4 Assessment Criteria: Weighting 100%Written Report: 3,000 words4GUIDANCE ON ASSESSMENTAll materials must be properly referenced under Harvard conventions. The length required is 3,000 words with tasks equally weighted. The writing style shouldbe formal academic / report writing style with in-text referencing to support your comments and observations. Originality, quality of argument and good structureare required. The report should demonstrate sound understanding and ability to apply knowledge and theory with additional marks being awarded forjuxtaposition and insight of issues.Grading Criteria Generic Criteria90 – 10080 – 8970 – 7960-6950 – 5940-490 – 39Level 7Knowledge of contexts,concepts, technologies andprocessesThe extent to which knowledgeis demonstrated:relevant contextual ortheoretical issues are identified,defined and describedhistorical or contemporarypractices are identified, definedand describedappropriate technologies,methods and processes areidentified, defined anddescribedExceptional andremarkable criticalunderstanding of currentissues and historicalcontexts demonstratingknowledge at the forefrontof the disciplineExceptional and highlyoriginal understanding oftechniques methods andprocessesExcellent and highlysophisticated criticalunderstanding of currentissues and historicalcontexts demonstratingknowledgeat the forefront of thedisciplineAn excellent and highlyimpressive understandingof techniques, materialsand processesComprehensive criticalunderstanding of current issuesand historical contexts much ofwhich is at, or informed by, theforefront of the discipline.Comprehensive knowledge oftechniques and processes, and acritical understanding of theirpotential to advance scholarshipin the discipline.Sound understanding ofknowledge of currentissues and historicalcontexts, some of whichis at, or informed by, theforefront of thediscipline.Sound knowledge of thetechniques and processesapplicable to researchand advanced scholarshipin the disciplinePassable understandingof knowledge of currentissues and historicalcontexts, some of whichis at, or informed by, theforefront of thediscipline.Acceptable knowledge ofthe techniques andprocesses applicable toresearch and advancedscholarship in thedisciplineInsufficient understandingof knowledge of thecontextual, historical ortheoretical issues thatinform the discipline.Insufficient knowledge oftechniques applicable toresearch and advancedscholarship in the discipline.Very poor demonstration ofunderstanding ofcontextual, historical ortheoretical issues thatinform the discipline.Very weak knowledge oftechnologies, methods andprocessesUnderstanding throughapplication of knowledgeThe degree to whichresearch methods aredemonstrated:relevant knowledge andinformation is compared,contrasted, manipulated,translated and interpretedknowledge and informationis selected, analysed,synthesized and evaluatedin order to generatecreative ideas, solutions,arguments or hypothesesExceptional andremarkable demonstrationof research methods whichgenerate highly developedcritical insights intoexisting knowledgeExceptional andremarkable criticalevaluation of existingknowledge leading directlyto new hypothesesExceptional andremarkable judgementsmade in relation tocreative practice, currentideas, arguments andhypothesesExcellent and highlysophisticateddemonstration of researchmethods leading toimpressive critical insightsinto existing knowledgeExcellent and highlysophisticated criticalevaluation of existingknowledge workingtowards new hypothesesExcellent and highlysophisticated judgementsmade in relation tocreative practice, currentideas, arguments andhypothesesRigorous use of establishedmethods of research combinedwith the ability to generate newconcepts or insights into existingknowledge.Critical evaluation of currentknowledge to evaluatemethodological practices andpropose new hypotheses.Carefully consideredjudgements on highly complexor ‘under-researched’ problemsshowing evidence of systematicanalysis and deduction andcreative processes to resolvethem.Sound use of establishedmethods of research todevelop and interpretexisting knowledge.Critical evaluation ofcurrent knowledge andrecognition ofmethodological practices.Sound judgements madeon complex researchproblems showingevidence of systematicanalysis and deductionand creative processes toresolve them.Passable use ofestablished methods ofresearch to develop andinterpret existingknowledge.Evidence of criticalevaluation of currentknowledge andrecognition ofmethodological practices.Passable judgementsmade on complexresearch problemsshowing evidence ofsystematic analysis anddeduction and creativeprocesses to resolvethem.Insufficient use of existingmethodologies to developknowledge.Inability to fully understandor interpret relevantknowledge andmethodological practices.Research problems areinsufficiently complex andrequire mainly routineanalytic and creativeprocesses to resolve them.Inability to use and interpretexisting researchmethodologiesLittle or no ability toevaluate existing knowledgeInability to define a researchproblem and to generatesolutions or hypothesesthrough research andpracticeApplication of technicaland professional skillsExceptional andremarkable critical andExcellent and highlysophisticated critical andEvidence of a high level ofcritical and evaluative skills inEvidence of the criticaland evaluative skillsEvidence of the critical andevaluative skills necessaryEvidence of the critical andevaluative skills necessaryInability to demonstrate thecritical and evaluative skills 5 The degree to which:appropriate materials andmedia are selected, testedand utilised to realise andpresent ideas and solutionsappropriate technologies,methods and processes aredemonstratedtransferable, professionalskills are effectivelydemonstratedself management andindependent learning aredemonstratedevaluative skills utilisedleading to highly originalsolutions to very complexproblemsOutstanding application ofadvanced technical skillsthat fundamentallychallenges currentunderstanding andpracticesExceptional andremarkable demonstrationof professionalism, selfmanagement andindependent learningevaluative skills utilisedleading to impressivesolutions to very complexproblemsHighly impressiveapplication of advancedtechnical skills thatchallenge currentunderstanding andpracticesExcellent demonstration ofprofessionalism, selfmanagement andindependent learningorder to create original solutionsto a range of highly complexproblems.Application of advancedskills, techniques and processesthat challenge knowledge andunderstanding of the discipline.Demonstration of a very highlevel of professionalism, selfmanagement and independentlearningnecessary to constructsolutions to a range ofcomplex problemsApplication of advancedskills, techniques andprocesses that contributeto knowledge andunderstanding of thediscipline.Demonstration of acompetent level ofprofessionalism, selfmanagement andindependent learningto identify solutions to arange of complexproblems.Application of advancedskills techniques andprocesses that sustainindependent learning inthe discipline.Clear demonstration ofprofessionalism, selfmanagement andindependent learningto identify solutions to arange of varied problems.Application of advancedskills techniques andprocesses that sustainindependent learning inthe discipline.Acceptable demonstrationof professionalism, selfmanagement andindependent learningnecessary to identifysolutions to problemsInsufficient ability todemonstrate the skillsnecessary for sustainedindependent learningInsufficient evidence ofprofessional andtransferable skills


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *