COUniversity MGMT20135 | My Assignment Tutor

Home – COUniversity x c Unit: MGMT20135: Critic xAppsCOUniversity Unit Profile x,Assignmentx 3 MY ASSGINMENT HELP xel I Secure https://my-courses.cqu.edu.au/pub/profiles?unitCode =MGMT201358aermCode=2181MUDABBIR OTHERS RELIGION Tafsir Ibn Kathir c, Dr ibrahinn sydney IF Prayer Timings Mt Google -TranslateMUSTANEER E ACT Fibernet PortaKey Criteria Identified and explained the importance or significance of 2 learning outcomes from each individual lecture ‘tutorial. Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 85-100% Regular updates and insightful reflection. Student insights are interesting, thoughtful and demonstrates an ability to put ideas into an appropriate conceptual frame. Exceeds Expectations (Distinction)7; _ – 84% Regular updates and insightful reflection. Student insights are interesting and thoughtful. Meets Expectations (Credit) 65 — 74% Regular updates and insightful reflection. Meets Expectations (Pass) 50 — 64% Regular updates and satisfactory reflection. Below Expectations (Fail) below 50% Irregular updates and unsatisfactory reflection. Explained how the self-reflect tool has enhanced your knowledge of yourself Superior appreciation self- knowledge based upon the Reflect Tool. Very convincing appreciation of self-knowledge based upon the Reflect Tool. Fair appreciation of self- knowledge based upon the Reflect Tool. Poor appreciation of self- knowledge based upon the Reflect Tool. 004 No appreciation of self-knowledge based upon the Reflect Tool. Discussed how knowledge is developed and/or challenged. Superior discussion of how knowledge is developed and/or changed. Very convincing discussion of how knowledge is developed and/or changed. Fair discussion of how knowledge is developed and/or changed. Poor discussion of how knowledge is developed and/or changed. No discussion of how knowledge is developed and/or changed. Closing Excellent articulation of task; tied the arguments/insights together highlighting the use in future career and life generally. Good articulation of task; clearly tied the arguments/insights together highlighting the use in future career and life generally. Fair articulation of task; mostly tied the arguments/insights together highlighting the use in future career and life generally. Poor articulation of task; attempted to tied the arguments/insights together highlighting the use in future career and life generally. Poor articulation of task; did not tie the arguments/insights together highlighting the use in future career and life generally. Presentation and Quality of Writing Quality of writing at a very high standard. Sections are coherently connected to each other. Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. Quality of writing is of a high standard. Sections are mostly well structured. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. Quality of writing is of a good standard. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. Some problems with sentence structure and presentation. Frequent grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes. Use of inappropriate language. Quality of writing is at a very poor standard so barely understandable. Many spelling mistakes. Little or no evidence of proof reading.QType here to searchIRAmasters 6• – 14 / ))) ENG•3:30 AM 28 04 2018

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *