Current Distribution Data for Westvaco | My Assignment Tutor

‘able 5.6 Current Distribution Data for Westvaco Case Studyestination llama verett )hrata verview arson iamblee mover larks rsippany finghamState Trips StopsGA MA PA MI CA GA MN PA NV NJ IL NJ4 1 3 3 0 5 0 1 2 1 0 1 3 0 2 0 1 1 5 7 0Minimum charge per truckload Stop-off chargeAvailable pulls CommitmentCarrier MRST NEST psyrMiles ABCT IRST LAST612 $ 0,88 1.15 0.87 0.95 1,05 612 1.18 1.27 1.39 1.35 1.21; 190 3.42 1.73 1.71 1.82 2.00 383 0.79 1.01 1.25 0.96 0.95 1.11 3063 0.80 0,87 * 1.00 • 429 1.23 1.61 1.22 1.33 1.47 600 1.24 1.13 1.89 1.32 1.41 1.41 136 4.78 2.23 2.39 2.26 2.57 2439 1.45 • 1.20 * * 355 1.62 1.36 1.39 1.1)3 1.76 570 0 87 0,87 1.25 0.87 0.90 1.31 324 2.01 1.54 1.53 1.28 1.95 350 400 350 300 350 300 50 75 50 35 50 30 4 8 7 7 3 4 7 6 0 4r Astcrisks } indicate carrier does not travel to the destinatiiin ;AL.% in dtillarsintile.dicant variability to the carrier selection process. technique adds accountability to the transporta-i planner’s position and, tied to a reason code for aging the carrier, offers a clear answer to man-agement questions regarding carrier selection. Finally, the time savings have also been significant. The carrier assignment portion of the transportation planner’s lob can be done much faster than before.8tube wilt contributed by Da∎c. %hi) Ric and implemcnted chi, ‘Holt’, I at West%,acti

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *