HI5030 Systems Analysis and Design | My Assignment Tutor

HI5030 Systems Analysis and DesignResearch Paper Individual AssessmentAssessment Weight: 40% (3 deliverables)Due: Sessions 5, 8, 13Objective(s)This assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the unit descriptor. This assessmentis designed to improve student research and writing skills and to give students experience inresearching the literature on a specific topic relevant to the Unit of Study subject matter. Studentswill be expected to complete a literature review to discuss a contemporary aspect of SystemsAnalysis or Systems Design which an IS professional may experience. Students will criticallyanalyze current academic papers then present their work in a detailed literature review and analysis.InstructionsThis assessment will be completed individually. All students must have a different topic. Studentscan choose to write about similar aspects of Analysis and Design, but the approach and the thrust ofeach paper must be different. To ensure this uniqueness, each student must decide on a topic andemail their topic and title to their tutor within the first 3 weeks. The topic can be on any aspectrelated to Analysis and Design, including but not limited to systems requirements, methodologies,process, process modeling, automation, systems design, testing, integration, human-computerinterfaces, technology aspects with system design, systems planning etc… The title should be veryspecific, something you can write a literature review on, and not be too general. For instance, youcannot say “my title will be Testing”. It needs to be on some specific aspect of testing related toSystems Analysis and Design. You will need to put some thought into topic and title selection.Your tutor will respond with an approval or with a message that you will either need to choose adifferent topic or title, be more specific or to change the thrust of your paper. You tutor may decideto do this for you, but as part of the assessment you should be able to do this yourself. Once it hasbeen approved you should begin by working towards the first deliverable.This assessment is worth 40% of the unit grade and is a major assessment. Students are advised tobegin working on this assessment as soon as you have your topic approvedThere are three (3) deliverables for this assessment DeliverableWeightWeek DueOutline Submission5%Week 5Draft Submission10%Week 8Final Submission20%Week 13 ________________________________________________________________________________1Note: It is important to realize, that you must have prior approval for a topic before you can submit.If you submit something for assessment without approval for the specific topic, it will not begraded. Once you have a topic approved, you cannot change it without consent from your subjectlecturer.The day and time of the due week that the assessment must be submitted will be announced by yoursubject coordinator.Deliverable DescriptionsBelow is a description of the different deliverables and the requirementsOutline SubmissionThe outline deliverable is due in week 5 and is the outline of the paper you intend to write.The outline will consist of: the title, your name and a list of the section headings that will beincluded in your Literature Review. You should include at least 5 section headings which arerelevant to the topic you have been allocated, (this list should not include either ‘Introduction’ or‘Conclusion’, though these can be included apart from the 5 others). You need to include at leastfive preliminary references and indicate in which section they will be included. The references mustbe relevant to the topic assigned.Thus once allocated your topic, you need consider how you will structure the literature review soyou can devise a list or headings. You must have access the full-text article of any reference youuse. You cannot use a reference where you only have access to the abstract and title, or a smallsection of the paper.Draft SubmissionThe draft submission is due in week 8 and continues on from the outline submission above with thesame topic your group was allocated.For the draft submission you are to write an Introduction, consisting of at least 2 paragraphs, andyou are to write one major paragraph for each of the five sections that you identified in the outlinesubmission.Your introduction and other paragraphs should cite references from your reference list, and yourreference list for this submission should include your previous references and at least another 5references which are relevant to the topic allocated. So your reference list should contain at least 10references at this stage. All references must be in Harvard format including the in-text citations. Foreach reference you must include a link to the full text of the reference. This link must be workingand cannot be to just an abstract and title, or only a section of the paper you are referencing. This________________________________________________________________________________2must be a direct link, we will not follow multiple links trying to find the paper.If for some reason you decide to change one of the headings from the outline submission, you needto write why this has changed, and are to follow the rules above by providing one major paragraphfor the new section. The section needs to be relevant to the topic and of course your associatedreferences need to be relevant.Final SubmissionThe final submission of your paper is due in week 13 and continues on from the outline and draftsubmission above with the same topic.The final submission should be no less than 2500 words and include the work you have alreadydone in the draft submission (including any changes based on feedback). You need to extend thework already performed in the draftThe final version of your paper is the polished version, the approach should follow the same plan asyour draft, but obviously some change may have occurred from the draft. You should not use a lotof small sections and bullet points in the final version. Your literature review should be presentingthe state of current knowledge in the specific area of your topic and title, and as such, should have anarrative that flows from one paragraph to another. You cannot achieve this with bullet points andsmall disjoint sections. All references included with your paper must be cited within the paper andbe appropriate to the context of the citation.I would expect at east 12 references in the final submission, and as well as providing the links to thefull-text articles, you are required to use an adapted Harvard referencing scheme for the in-textcitations. This adapted Harvard citation requires you to provide the page and paragraph number inthe reference that the content you are referencing can be found. For example, the reference may belisted asP Hawking, B McCarthy, A Stein (2004), Second Wave ERP Education, Journal of Information Systems Education, Fall, http://jise.org/Volume15/n3/JISEv15n3p327.pdfThe in-text citations would then beThe company decided to implement an enterprise wide data warehouse business intelligencestrategies (Hawking et al, 2004, p3(4)).In the above example with p3(4), the p3 refers to the page number within the reference, and the (4)refers to the paragraph number within that page where the content can be found. These referencingmarkers will be checked for accuracy and authenticity as part of the assessment grading process.For the final submission, In Summary:________________________________________________________________________________3• All references must use the Harvard adapted referencing style as described• The length of the paper is to be 2500 words (excluding the references, contents etc.)• The final submission is to build on what was already completed in the draft submission• The font of the body text should be 12pt Times New Roman font, 1.5 line spaced• Section Heading should be in Arial Bold 12 point font• At NO time should you use Wikipedia as a referenceNon Adherence to Referencing GuidelinesWhere students do not follow the above referencing guidelines:1. Students who submit assignments which do not comply with the guidelines will be heavilypenalized and a maximum of a passing grade only may be applied.2. Students who provide false referencing information (including the page and paragraphmarkers) will be referred to the Academic Integrity Unit.Submission GuidelinesYour document should be a single MS Word or OpenOffice document containing your report. DoNot use PDF as a submission format,All submissions will be submitted through the safeAssign facility in Blackboard. Submission boxeslinked to SafeAssign will be set up in the Units Blackboard Shell. Assignments not submittedthrough these submission links will not be considered.Submissions must be made by the due date and time (which will be in the session detailed above)and determined by your Unit coordinator. Submissions made after the due date and time will bepenalized per day late (including weekend days) according to Holmes Institute policies.The SafeAssign similarity score will be used in determining the level, if any, of plagiarism.SafeAssign will check conference web-sites, Journal articles, the Web and your own classmembers submissions for plagiarism. You can see your SafeAssign similarity score (or match)when you submit your assignment to the appropriate drop-box. If this is a concern you will have achance to change your assignment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior tothe submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed your assignment will begraded as late. Submitted assignments that indicate a high level of plagiarism will be penalizedaccording to the Holmes Academic Misconduct policy, there will be no exceptions. Thus, planearly and submit early to take advantage of the re-submission feature. You can make multiplesubmissions, but please remember we grade only the last submission, and the date and time yousubmitted will be taken from that submission.________________________________________________________________________________4Academic IntegrityHolmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding Academic Integrity, as Academic Integrityis integral to maintaining academic quality and the reputation of Holmes’ graduates. Accordingly,all assessment tasks need to comply with academic integrity guidelines. Table 1 identifies the sixcategories of Academic Integrity breaches. If you have any questions about Academic Integrityissues related to your assessment tasks, please consult your lecturer or tutor for relevant referencingguidelines and support resources. Many of these resources can also be found through the StudySills link on Blackboard.Academic Integrity breaches are a serious offence punishable by penalties that may range fromdeduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment,or cancellation of course enrolment.Table 1: Six categories of Academic Integrity breaches PlagiarismReproducing the work of someone else without attribution. When astudent submits their own work on multiple occasions this is known asself-plagiarism.CollusionWorking with one or more other individuals to complete an assignment, ina way that is not authorised.CopyingReproducing and submitting the work of another student, with or withouttheir knowledge. If a student fails to take reasonable precautions toprevent their own original work from being copied, this may also beconsidered an offence.ImpersonationFalsely presenting oneself, or engaging someone else to present as oneself,in an in-person examination.Contract cheatingContracting a third party to complete an assessment task, generally inexchange for money or other manner of payment.Data fabrication andfalsificationManipulating or inventing data with the intent of supporting falseconclusions, including manipulating images. Source: INQAAHE, 2020________________________________________________________________________________5


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.